Do T Grade Or Critique Students’ Work You Are Replying As An
Do T Grade Or Critique Students Work You Are Replying As Another Stud
Do T Grade Or Critique Students Work You Are Replying As Another Stud
Do t grade or critique students work, you are replying as another student adding to coconversation. First reply, Mason In the 1920s, America went through a period known as the Red Scare. This began because of the protests in reply to low wages. Many workers went on strike and refused to work because they felt that they deserved more pay. In this period of time the demand of services sky-rocketed, but wages stayed the same because of bans on raising wages.
Many Americans feared that this was happening because of the support from the communist. This is what triggered the fear of immigrants who were so called communists. This triggered the fear of immigrants who were supposedly communists. After having this scare, America contemplated the idea of closing their borders to protect themselves against the then viewed scary Russians. When this happened, more than 5,000 immigrants were taken into custody with the idea that they were guilty. Many immigrants were also deported from America, and many American citizens were accused of holding radical political ideas, and housing immigrants in the hope that they would not be deported if they were not found.
This period of time led to much criticism from Congress and the press. After receiving hate, Palmer decided to release immigrants that had been detained. The period of 1919 and 1920 created a devastating setback for radical and labor organizations (Foner, 2017). Also, at this time, Warren G. Harding was running for office. As a lure for many Americans, he decided to make his campaign slogan “return to normalcy,” which of course caused many people to vote for him with the idea that all would be better again; he then continued to receive 60 percent of the popular vote and inspired many Americans to persevere and carry out their goals, just as he was doing (Foner, 2017). These readings display the growing divide in America due to various reasons.
America at this time was not a unified country as it had been previously. These texts show the chain of events that led to the Cold War, or before that, the Red Scare. Many Americans were torn apart due to the disliking of Russians because they were believed to be communists. After analyzing the texts that explained the Red Scare, it conveys that although we may have been unified in previous years, during this time of crisis, America was in need of rebuilding and bringing together its conflicting citizens.
References:
Foner, E. (2017a). Give Me Liberty: An American History (5th ed., Vol. 2). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Paper For Above instruction
The Red Scare of the 1920s was a pivotal moment in American history, reflecting deep divisions and anxieties about the future of the nation amidst global upheaval and domestic unrest. This period was marked by intense fear of radical political ideologies, especially communism, which was perceived as a direct threat to American values and stability. The readings highlight how this fear led to policies and societal reactions that fueled division and suspicion among Americans, altering the fabric of the nation.
The primary catalyst for the Red Scare was the Russian Revolution of 1917, which established a communist government and inspired fears among Americans that similar revolutionary ideas could take hold in the United States. The hope for a “return to normalcy” articulated by Warren G. Harding in 1920 exemplifies the American desire to restore stability after years of upheaval, including World War I, labor strikes, and immigrant influx. Harding’s campaign slogan reflected a yearning to retreat from radical change and to reinforce traditional American values, yet the underlying tensions persisted (Foner, 2017).
One of the most tangible manifestations of these tensions was the wave of immigration restrictions and targeted suppression of radicals. The Palmer Raids, initiated by Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer, exemplified government overreach fueled by fear. Over 5,000 immigrants were detained without sufficient evidence, often based solely on suspicion of radical sympathies (Foner, 2017). Many of these individuals were deported or imprisoned, exemplifying the repression of civil liberties during this era. These actions sowed distrust and fear among immigrant communities, especially those from Eastern and Southern Europe, who were unfairly scapegoated as threats to American society.
The readings also reflect societal anxieties through cases like Sacco and Vanzetti, two Italian immigrants accused of robbery and murder. Their trial and subsequent execution occurred amid widespread anti-immigrant sentiment, characterized by prejudice and hysteria (Foner, 2017). The atmosphere of anti-immigrant and anti-radical hysteria created an environment where justice was compromised, and immigrants were often unfairly targeted based on their ethnic backgrounds and political beliefs.
The case of Vanzetti’s last statement underscores themes of injustice and the fear-driven persecution that defined the era. Vanzetti emphasized his innocence and condemned the prejudice he faced, highlighting how the tensions of the time led to violations of civil rights and liberties. This case, along with the immigration policies and the Palmer Raids, exemplifies how American society was divided—caught between fear and a desire for security.
Furthermore, the readings on congressional immigration policies reveal a shift toward restrictive statutes that aimed to control the influx of immigrants, particularly those perceived as radical or unassimilable. These policies marked a departure from the earlier era of largely open immigration, reflecting anxieties about losing American cultural identity and fears of radical influence spreading within the country (Foner, 2017). The Immigration Act of 1924, for example, severely limited immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, further entrenching divisions and showcasing the desire to mold a homogenous national identity.
The case of Meyer v. Nebraska further illustrates the cultural conflicts associated with the Red Scare, specifically the suppression of foreign-language instruction. This law and its subsequent invalidation by the Supreme Court demonstrate the tension between national security measures and individual civil liberties. The ruling reaffirmed that laws violating the rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment could not be justified solely on grounds of perceived security threats (Foner, 2017). It exemplifies the ongoing debate about how far the government could go in restricting rights during times of crisis.
In sum, these readings illuminate a period wherein American society was deeply divided over its identity, security, and future direction. The Red Scare catalyzed policies of repression, immigration restrictions, and widespread suspicion, which fractured the unity that once characterized the nation. While the desire for stability was understandable, the means employed also revealed underlying prejudices and weaknesses in American democracy. These divisions echo through subsequent histories of civil liberties and immigrant rights, highlighting the importance of safeguarding civil liberties even amid fears of radical ideologies. The historical lessons from this period serve as a reminder of the importance of balancing security concerns with the fundamental rights of all citizens.
References
Foner, E. (2017a). Give Me Liberty: An American History (5th ed., Vol. 2). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Foner, E. (2017b). Voices of Freedom: A Documentary History (5th ed., Vol. 2). New York: W.W. Norton