Do We Have An Ethical Obligation To Assist People? ✓ Solved

Talima Do We Have An Ethical Obligation To Assist People Caught Up In

Talima, Do we have an ethical obligation to assist people caught up in these large-scale movements of people to help them secure the basic necessities of food, water, and a secure way of life. Why or why not? As a nation, I do believe that we have an ethical obligation as well as a moral obligation to assist people caught up in large-scale movements of people to help them secure basic necessities of food, water, and secure way of life to a certain extent. We can not take care of or take in everyone in the world without then placing ourselves in place of being depleted of the basic necessities. Although we should help people as much as we can because we can be in the same situation ourselves and would like the same reciprocity. It is very hard on our nation to help our own citizens, so helping others is not an easy feat. For example, Hurricane Katrina was the most catastrophic natural disaster in U.S. History with an estimated cost of $125 billion in damages. Global warming is a contributor in making this natural disasters stronger. In turn we have to deal with internal climate migration. Cities then become overpopulated and therefore more pollution which is a contributor to climate change. So as a nation, we should help as much as we can while protecting home first. Because climate change is a global problem and affects everyone, we therefore have an ethical obligation to help one another as much as possible.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The ethical obligation of nations to assist people affected by large-scale movements, such as climate migration and natural disasters, is a complex issue rooted in moral responsibility, practical capacity, and international stability. While nations must prioritize their citizens’ welfare, in our interconnected world, neglecting global humanitarian needs can lead to greater instability and suffering that ultimately impacts everyone, including the developed nations themselves (Rawls, 1971). Historically, countries like the U.S. have benefited from international aid and cooperation, establishing a moral duty to reciprocate in times of crisis (Bauman, 2011). The aftermath of Hurricane Katrina exemplifies how domestic and international assistance can mitigate disasters' impacts, highlighting shared responsibility. Global warming intensifies disasters, forcing internal climate migration and overpopulation in urban centers, escalating pollution and resource strain (IPCC, 2021). Addressing these issues requires a balanced approach—helping others while safeguarding national interests. Ethical frameworks like cosmopolitanism argue that moral obligations extend beyond borders, emphasizing a duty to assist vulnerable populations regardless of nationality (Nussbaum, 2000). Conversely, some argue that limited resources should be reserved for citizens first, stressing national sovereignty (Miller, 2000). In conclusion, the interconnected nature of climate change and human displacement necessitates that nations adopt a moral stance supporting international aid, tailored to their capacity, to foster global stability and resilience. Such cooperation aligns with principles of fairness and reciprocity, ultimately benefiting all.

References

• Bauman, Z. (2011). Collateral damage: Social inequalities in a global age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. IPCC.
• Miller, D. (2000). Global justice: A cosmopolitan interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.