Doing Good Requires Authentic Leadership Prerna Sinha Forbes
Doing Good Requires Authentic Leadershipprerna Sinhaforbes Staffi Cove
Doing Good Requires Authentic Leadershipprerna Sinhaforbes Staffi Cove
Doing GOOD Requires Authentic Leadership Prerna Sinha FORBES STAFF I cover the profits and perils of noncommercial endeavors · · · · Over the last five years several top brands have partnered with GOOD/CORPS to execute notable social campaigns. GOOD/CORPS is the consulting arm of GOOD Worldwide, a media platform that produces a quarterly magazine, website, and online tools aimed at “moving the world forward”. Grant Garrison is the cofounder and Director of Partnerships & Strategy for GOOD/CORPS, a team that has worked with various clients on social challenges. He emphasizes that authentic leadership is critical for viral campaigns, driven by stakeholder, consumer, and employee expectations for companies to have a purpose beyond profit. Garrison notes many companies genuinely want to make a positive impact, even if they don’t always act purely altruistically.
GOOD/CORPS has long-standing partnerships with foundations, NGOs, and businesses like Starbucks. When GOOD started in 2006, Howard Schultz, then CEO of Starbucks, expressed his interest in their work, leading to projects such as info-graphics for Starbucks’ “Create Jobs for USA” campaign and initiatives like Vote, Give, Grow, which involved Starbucks Rewards members in grant distribution. Garrison describes GOOD/CORPS’ role as a steward guiding companies towards authentic leadership across four key principles: 1. Select a core issue aligned with company values; 2. Add value to a community that cares about the issue; 3. Involve community members in planning; 4. Be transparent about self-interest.
For instance, Chipotle’s “The Scarecrow” YouTube video spotlighted harmful agricultural practices, garnering over 11 million views and illustrating leadership through issue-driven awareness. Authentic leadership also involves integrating these principles into broader strategies, as exemplified by Pepsi’s Refresh Project, which raised $32 million for community initiatives through a transparent, brand-marked platform. Such authenticity fosters trust, enabling companies to leverage their brand power effectively while supporting social causes.
Garrison advocates a targeted approach of aligning causes with business missions, emphasizing the importance of multi-sector collaboration. Programs like 100Kin10, supporting STEM education, and Unilever’s Challenges and Wants showcase how organizations can work with diverse partners to tackle specific challenges. Transparency about a company’s self-interest—such as Pepsi’s acknowledgment of the marketing nature of their project—can amplify impact and authenticity.
In summary, authentic leadership in social campaigns hinges on meaningful issue selection, community involvement, transparency, and consistent integration with corporate values. Companies that embrace these principles not only contribute to societal progress but also strengthen their brand trust and employee engagement, ultimately resulting in mutual and sustainable success.
Paper For Above instruction
Authentic leadership plays a vital role in the success of social campaigns and philanthropic endeavors undertaken by modern corporations. As organizations increasingly recognize the importance of aligning their business strategies with social impact, establishing genuine leadership that is rooted in transparency, community involvement, and mission-driven initiatives becomes crucial. This paper explores the principles of authentic leadership in social campaigns, exemplified by organizations such as GOOD/CORPS, Starbucks, Chipotle, Pepsi, and Unilever, and discusses how these principles foster trust, engagement, and meaningful change.
One of the key elements of authentic leadership in social campaigns is the selection of issues that resonate with the core values and mission of the organization. Garrison emphasizes that championing a cause connected to the company's identity enables leveraging both employee engagement and brand assets effectively. For example, Starbucks’ commitment to creating jobs through its “Create Jobs for USA” campaign and Vote, Give, Grow initiative exemplifies aligning social efforts with business objectives. Such alignment ensures that societal efforts are not superficial but integrated into the company's strategic fabric, fostering genuine connection and impact.
Another vital component is community involvement, which ensures social campaigns are driven by and beneficial to the communities they aim to serve. Garrison highlights that involving community members in planning and execution adds authenticity and relevance, increasing the likelihood of sustained engagement. Chipotle’s animated video, “The Scarecrow,” is an illustrative case where the company used a culturally resonant medium to raise awareness about harmful food practices, reflecting authentic leadership by advocating for a cause that aligns with their brand purpose of promoting responsible sourcing.
Transparency, particularly in acknowledging motives and self-interests, enhances credibility and trustworthiness. Garrison contends that companies should openly communicate their intentions, framing their social campaigns as part of a broader brand strategy rather than covert marketing efforts. Pepsi’s Refresh Project exemplifies this approach, openly framing its initiative as a marketing activity that also generates social good, thereby maintaining authenticity while achieving business objectives. Transparency in motives helps mitigate skepticism and builds lasting relationships with stakeholders and communities.
Integrating these principles necessitates a deliberate, ongoing commitment supported by top management. Organizations like Unilever exemplify structured approaches through their Challenges and Wants initiative, which invites collaboration on predefined challenges, fostering a culture of innovation and purpose. Moreover, partnerships such as 100Kin10 demonstrate how multi-sector collaboration can bolster impact by combining resources, expertise, and shared goals.
Authentic leadership also involves aligning social efforts with overall corporate values and fostering a culture of purpose-driven action within the organization. This alignment promotes consistency in messaging, decision-making, and behavior across all levels, reinforcing the company’s commitment to societal good. Companies that succeed in integrating authentic leadership principles often experience enhanced brand loyalty, employee motivation, and customer trust, ultimately translating societal impact into competitive advantage.
In conclusion, authentic leadership is indispensable for effective social campaigns. It requires thoughtful issue selection, active community participation, transparent motives, and unwavering alignment with corporate values. Organizations that adopt this approach can create authentic, impactful initiatives that benefit society, strengthen their reputation, and foster long-term success. As the landscape of corporate social responsibility continues to evolve, the emphasis on genuine leadership will remain a cornerstone for meaningful corporate contributions to society.
References
- Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.
- Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Matten, D. (2014). Contemporary CSR theories: navigating the core issues. California Management Review, 56(2), 130-155.
- Gizzi, C., Parmentier, M. A., & Bascoul, G. (2018). Authentic leadership and corporate social responsibility: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 621-632.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business Press.
- Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2003). Public acceptance of biotechnology: issues and questions. Foresight, 5(2), 56-63.
- Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Ethical Leadership and Social Impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(4), 747-759.
- Shamir, B., & Eilam, G. (2005). "What's Your Story?": Narrative and Identity in Authentic Leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 395-417.
- Walsh, J. P., & Fahey, L. (2005). The Firm’s Environment and Its Strategic Response. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 365-376.
- Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.