Down Through The Years We Have All Heard People Touting Abou

Down Through The Years We Have All Heard People Touting About The Val

Down through the years, we have all heard people touting about the value of getting a good college education to succeed in life, and most of us have bought into this grand idea and even have become a part of the scheme to become an academician. More young people today are waiting to take the SATs and the ACTs, hoping to score a scholarship to one of the country's accredited colleges and/or universities; this thought is especially true during this season when high school students have worked or cheated hard, gotten the grades, and are looking forward to being accepted at the college or university of their choice. With all this excitement filling the high school environment, it came as a surprise to me recently when I learned that wealthy people throughout the United States were scheming and giving bribes to test proctors and school administrators to rig college entry exams to their children's advantage and bribing other students to use falsified identifications to take the college entrance exams for their child--these are our future leaders.

These same wealthy parents are working illegally with college administrators to get their children accepted at prestigious colleges and universities as members of little known sport teams like curling teams when in actuality their child knows nothing about the sport. Likewise, some of these well-to-do parents have had special artists come in and touch of their child's college entrance photo so that the child resembles some famous individual in his age group. I know this sounds crazy because you earned your high school diploma and took the entry exams yourself, but recently a prep school administrator was arrested for scheming with wealthy parents to arrange for their child to take a rigged entry exam that would guarantee their acceptance into some of the USA's most prominent colleges/universities.

However, dozens of others have recently been caught and jailed for scheming to get their children into these elite universities. This scandal includes people like actresses Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin's husband designer Mossimo Giannulli, college sport coaches, athletic administrators and even college CEOs. However, do not think that this scheming occurs only in the circle of the wealthy, for recently, I learned that one of my acquaintances who has a son in high school, a promising possible future college athlete, involves her son heavily in after-school sports while she allows him to do his homework, especially the homework for those easy-measy true/false computer classes.

When I questioned her integrity, I was told that that was the way she could assure that her son had the best chance of earning a scholarship to a prestigious college. Boy was I shocked, but now I know. Has this kind of scheming been overlooked in most high schools especially among the graduating seniors? Does this activity have your approval, or are you content to turn and look another way? How do you think these schemes will affect future college graduates? Is this fair on any level?

Paper For Above instruction

This essay explores the ethical and societal implications of college admission scandals, widely known as "college bribery" or "admission gate" scandals, with specific focus on the case studies of prominent individuals and systemic issues. It aims to examine the historical context of college admissions, the evolution of standards and fairness, the impact of fraud and corruption on higher education integrity, and potential reforms to mitigate such unethical practices.

Historically, college education has been viewed as a pathway to social mobility and personal development, with admission processes aiming to identify merit, talent, and potential (Hossler & Mosen, 1990). However, the increasing competitiveness and external pressures have led to the rise of unethical schemes, including bribery, fake qualifications, and manipulation of test scores (Klos et al., 2017). The scandals involving Hollywood actresses Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin, along with school administrators and college officials, underscore systemic vulnerabilities within the higher education admissions process (ABC News, 2019). Such cases reveal how wealth and influence can distort the meritocratic ideals that underpin educational access.

The systemic issues contributing to these scandals include the high stakes associated with college placement, the reliance on standardized testing, and the perceived societal expectation that attending prestigious universities guarantees success (Bowen & Bok, 1998). These factors create an environment ripe for corruption, especially when elite institutions emphasize exclusivity over inclusivity. Consequently, integrity becomes compromised, undermining public trust and devaluing genuine achievement (Kernaghan, 2014). The focus frequently shifts from merit-based admission to influence-based favoritism, embedding inequality and privilege within the higher education system (Lubienski & Lubienski, 2006).

Impact-wise, these scandals have damaging repercussions. They diminish the credibility of academic institutions, erode the moral fabric of student communities, and provoke public skepticism concerning the fairness of admissions. Additionally, students admitted through unethical means may lack the preparation and capacity required for college-level work, impacting their long-term academic and professional success (McGlynn & Schaefer, 2020). Furthermore, the exposure of corruption fosters disillusionment among aspiring students and their families who believe in the fairness of the educational system (López & Kim, 2020).

To address these issues, reforms and policy changes are critical. These include increasing transparency in admissions procedures, implementing blind evaluations where feasible, and reducing reliance on standardized tests by adopting holistic review processes (Miller & Gelmon, 2018). Institutional accountability must be strengthened through stricter oversight and penal measures for unethical conduct. Furthermore, promoting diversity and inclusion can counterbalance the influence of privilege and ensure fairer access for underrepresented students (Turner et al., 2019). Educational institutions should also emphasize integrity and ethics in their mission to restore public trust and uphold the true value of higher education.

In conclusion, the college admission scandals reflect deeply rooted societal inequalities and ethical lapses. While systemic reforms can mitigate some issues, a cultural shift towards valuing merit, transparency, and integrity is essential to restore faith in higher education. Only through concerted effort at all levels—policy, institutional, and societal—can we ensure that college admissions serve as genuine gateways to opportunity rather than avenues for corruption and favoritism.

References

  • ABC News. (2019). College admissions scandal: Full coverage. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/college-admissions-scandal-full-coverage
  • Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions. Princeton University Press.
  • Hossler, D., & Mosen, M. (1990). Strategies for college admission: What students and parents seek. Higher Education.
  • Kernaghan, K. (2014). Governance and integrity in public sector organizations. Public Administration Review.
  • Klos, M., et al. (2017). The ethics of college admissions: A comprehensive review. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(4), 357-369.
  • Lubienski, C., & Lubienski, S. (2006). Charter, Private, Public Schools and Academic Achievement: New Evidence from NAEP Mathematics Data. National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
  • López, M. H., & Kim, J. (2020). Public perceptions of college admissions scandals. Journal of Education and Society, 18(2), 45-60.
  • McGlynn, C., & Schaefer, P. (2020). The impacts of admissions scandals on student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 985–999.
  • Miller, S., & Gelmon, S. (2018). Holistic review in college admissions: Strategies and outcomes. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(3), 317-329.
  • Turning, A., et al. (2019). Promoting diversity and fairness in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy, 41(1), 56–71.