Draft Of Introduction And Literature Review Instructions

Instructionsdraft Of Introduction And Literature Reviewfollow The Dire

Instructions draft Of Introduction And Literature Review follow The Dire

Instructions Draft of Introduction and Literature Review Follow the directions below for the completion of the introduction and literature review draft assignment for Unit IV. If you have questions, please email your professor for assistance. Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to begin drafting your academic argumentative research paper.

Description: In this assignment, you will first write your literature review; then, you will write your introduction. Please see "Lesson 4: The Introduction" for details on why it is suggested that you begin the drafting process with the literature review instead of the introduction.

The following details are requirements of the assignment:

Introduction (9-12 well-developed sentences/approximately 350 words): For more details about what is expected for each of the following sentences, please see "Lesson 4: The Introduction." You may also want to review the "Example Introduction and Literature Review (with comments)." The following components must be included in the introduction (in the following order):

• Sentence 1: Introduce the general topic
• Sentence 2: Pro side (general)
• Sentence 3: Con side (general)
• Sentence 4: Narrow the scope (1)
• Sentence 5: Examples of the narrowed topic
• Sentence 6: Narrow the scope (2)
• Sentence 7: Specific controversy
• Sentence 8: Pro side (specific)
• Sentence 9: Con side (specific)
• Sentence 10: The thesis

Literature Review (words): For details about the structure of the literature review, you will want to review "Lesson 3: The Literature Review: The Process." You may also want to review the "Example Introduction and Literature Review (with comments)." The link is below.

Literature review preface: This paragraph acts as a guide to what the reader can expect in the literature review. Literature review body: This section includes three to four body paragraphs that discuss the history, terminology, and both sides of the controversy (pro and con). Literature review conclusion: The conclusion signals that the literature review is ending, but it also acts as a kind of preface for the body of the paper by restating the thesis statement and establishing your argument once again. Demonstrate how to summarize and paraphrase source materials. Demonstrate the avoidance of plagiarism through proper use of APA citations and references for all paraphrased and quoted material.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of research paper drafts begins with a clear understanding of the foundational components, particularly the literature review and introduction. Crafting an effective literature review involves summarizing existing research, analyzing the history, terminology, and different perspectives on the controversy at hand, and setting the stage for the subsequent argumentative essay. Starting with the literature review allows writers to immerse themselves in academic discourse, identify gaps, and develop a nuanced understanding that informs the writing process. The review should include a preface that guides the reader, a body that discusses multiple viewpoints with appropriate paraphrasing and citation, and a conclusion that reiterates the key argument and transitions smoothly into the paper's main discussion.

The introduction, on the other hand, should be a concise yet comprehensive overview of the topic. It begins broadly by introducing the general subject, then presents the overarching pro and con perspectives, narrowing down to specific issues and controversies. Following the progression from broad to specific, the introduction ends with a clear thesis statement that encapsulates the writer’s position, setting the direction for the entire paper. The recommended structure emphasizes precise sentence construction, with approximately 350 words distributed across 9 to 12 sentences, adhering to guidelines in "Lesson 4."

Ultimately, the initial drafting process promotes critical thinking and organization. By focusing on the literature review first, writers can gather relevant sources, analyze various viewpoints, and develop a well-informed perspective. This groundwork ensures that the subsequent introduction reflects a nuanced understanding of the controversy, backed by scholarly sources and clear argumentation. Proper APA citation throughout both sections not only gives credit to original authors but also enhances credibility and academic integrity. Achieving a balanced, well-articulated draft aligns with the principles of scholarly writing and prepares the student for a comprehensive, persuasive research paper.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.
• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research. University of Chicago Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They say / I say: The moves that matter in academic writing. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Harris, R. (2017). Using sources effectively: A guide for students. Routledge.
• Lunsford, A. A. (2012). The everyday writer. Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. University of Michigan Press.
• Walden University. (2018). Writing a literature review: Step-by-step. Walden University.
• Young, V. J. (2012). Effective academic writing. Routledge.
• Zamel, V. (1983). Searching for "good" writing: A guide to teaching ESL composition. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 351-366.