Draft The Thesis Statement For Your Research Paper Failure

Draft The Thesis Statement For Your Research Paper Failure To Provide

Draft the thesis statement for your research paper. Failure to provide a thesis statement will result in a 5-point deduction from your grade. Locate three academic sources that you will use for your capstone research paper. One source should describe or explain the history, purpose(s), goal(s) or effects of a specific policy or broader set of policies such as, the 'War on Drugs', the 'Tough on Crime' movement, or 'Mass Incarceration.' One source must address the scope of the problem that your policy or program is trying to fix (this might be similar to source #1); and One source must be an empirical study that supports your thesis statement or is related to the policy area that you are investigating (for example, policing, sentencing, courts, corrections, or reentry). For each academic source, paste the abstract in a Word file and below the abstract write 1 to 3 sentences describing how you might utilize the source for your capstone research paper. Upload the Word or PDF file.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires developing a clear and concise thesis statement for a research paper on a policy-related issue, with a focus on the criminal justice system, such as mass incarceration, the war on drugs, or related policies. Additionally, it involves selecting three credible academic sources relevant to the policy topic, including a historical or policy background source, a scope of the problem source, and an empirical study that supports or relates to the thesis. For each source, students should include the abstract and a brief explanation of its relevance. This process ensures a comprehensive foundation for a well-argued research paper, grounded in credible academic literature.

The thesis statement is central to guiding the focus and argument of the research paper, articulating a specific position or perspective regarding the policy issue. Identifying appropriate sources is equally critical, as they provide evidence and context to support the thesis. The first source should offer background on the policy's history or purpose, framing the context within which the issue has developed. The second source distinguishes the scope of the problem, outlining the extent or severity of the issue being addressed. The third source supplies empirical data or analysis that can support or critically evaluate the thesis. Collectively, these sources help construct a robust and evidence-based research narrative.

In summary, this assignment emphasizes both the formulation of a clear thesis statement and the strategic selection of scholarly sources that together underpin a comprehensive research paper. Proper utilization of these sources involves summarizing their main ideas via abstracts and explicitly stating how each will contribute to advancing the research's argument or understanding. This approach ensures that the final paper is well-supported and grounded in credible academic work, facilitating a nuanced analysis of the specified policy issue within the criminal justice landscape.

References

  1. Alexander, M. (2012). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. The New Press.
  2. Beckett, K. (1997). Making Crime: From Back Streets to Courtrooms. Oxford University Press.
  3. Clear, T. R., Rose, D., Waring, E., & Scully, E. (2003). Coercive Mobility and Youth Disadvantage: A Criminological Evaluation of a Promise Neighborhood Initiative. American Journal of Sociology, 109(6), 1548-1590.
  4. Mauer, M. (2006). Recent Trends in Federal and State Imprisonment. Sentencing and Corrections, 2(1), 1-14.
  5. Ghandnoosh, N. (2015). Mass Incarceration and Racial Disparities. The Sentencing Project.
  6. Fagan, J., & Western, B. (2017). The criminal justice system: An overview and recent trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 377-392.
  7. Gottschalk, M. (2015). Caught: The Prison State and the Lockup Surge. Princeton University Press.
  8. Pratt, T. C. (2008). The Globalization of Crime Control: Trends, Trends, & Contradictions. Theoretical Criminology, 12(1), 35-61.
  9. Nagin, D. S., & Pogarsky, G. (2009). Deterrence and the 'Process of Reasoning' in the Context of Crime. Criminology, 44(4), 781-814.
  10. Western, B. (2006). Punishment and Inequality in America. Russell Sage Foundation.

Related Assignments