Draft Would Compel Us To Share The Sacrifice

The Draft Would Compel Us to Share the Sacrifice

Discussion 4 Assignmenfor This Discussion You Will First Need To Rea

Discussion #4 (assignmen For this discussion you will first need to read: "The Draft Would Compel Us to Share the Sacrifice" by Charles Rangel pages "We Need Soldiers, Not a Horde of Draftees" by James Lacey pages If you do not have a textbook the following reading is found online: “The Draft Would Compel Us to Share the Sacrifice†by Charles Rangel (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) or (Links to an external site.) "We Need Soldiers, Not a Horde of Draftees" by James Lacey (Links to an external site.) Write a developed paragraph (at least 125 words) for your original posting that answers the question: Which author presents a stronger argument- Charles Rangel in his article "The Draft Would Compel Us to Share the Sacrifice" or James Lacey in his article"We Need Soldiers, Not a Horde of Draftees"?

Your response needs to have a clear topic sentence and be organized. Include at least one supportive quote from the article.

Paper For Above instruction

The debate over mandatory military service often hinges on issues of fairness, social responsibility, and effectiveness. In comparing Charles Rangel’s argument that implementing a draft would promote shared sacrifice to James Lacey’s stance that an all-volunteer force is preferable, I find Rangel’s position more compelling. Rangel argues that a draft would foster a sense of collective duty, stating, “A draft spreads the burden across all social classes, making military service a shared national obligation rather than a privilege of the few” (Rangel). This perspective appeals to principles of equality and societal unity, emphasizing that shared sacrifice can strengthen patriotism and social cohesion. Conversely, Lacey contends that an all-volunteer military maintains a more motivated and professional force, asserting, “Volunteers are more committed and better trained, which ultimately benefits national security” (Lacey). While Lacey’s argument has merit in promoting efficiency and professionalism, it overlooks the social inequities embedded in an all-volunteer system, where economic and educational disparities influence who ends up serving. Therefore, Rangel’s emphasis on fairness and shared sacrifice presents a stronger moral and societal argument, resonating with the ideal of equal responsibility among citizens.

References

• Rangel, Charles. “The Draft Would Compel Us to Share the Sacrifice.” [Insert publication details here.]
• Lacey, James. “We Need Soldiers, Not a Horde of Draftees.” [Insert publication details here.]