Draftapmsnn5342 ELearn Utah Web Apps Rubric Docs

Draftapmsnn5342httpselearnutaeduwebappsrubricdoco

832016 Draftapmsnn5342httpselearnutaeduwebappsrubricdoco

Please review the provided rubric for an academic discussion assignment. The rubric outlines the expectations for spelling and grammar, APA format, initial post content, and peer interactivity. The criteria emphasize critical thinking, appropriate scholarly source usage, proper referencing, and timely responses to peers. Submissions are evaluated based on the quality and depth of engagement with the discussion topic, use of evidence-based statements, and interactive responsiveness in the online academic environment. Adherence to APA format and correct grammar are essential components for achieving full credit. The rubric details levels of achievement from unacceptable to exemplary performance, with corresponding point allocations. This framework guides the development of a scholarly, well-supported, and professionally presented discussion post that fulfills the assignment’s requirements.

Paper For Above instruction

The discussion assignment requires students to critically engage with a scholarly topic related to their field, demonstrating analytical thinking and clarity in communication. To meet the expectations outlined in the rubric, students must craft a response that thoroughly addresses the discussion prompt by integrating evidence from a minimum number of scholarly sources specified in the instructions. This means distinguishing between personal opinions and evidence-based statements to establish an academically rigorous post. Proper APA citation and formatting are non-negotiable and should be meticulously followed to reflect academic integrity and professionalism.

Initially, the student’s post should showcase critical thinking by not only summarizing relevant literature but also providing an insightful analysis that reflects an understanding of the topic's complexities. For instance, when discussing nursing theories, evidence-based practices, or healthcare policies, it is essential to cite current scholarly articles that support assertions made within the post. These sources serve to substantiate the argument, demonstrate research competence, and adhere to academic standards.

Furthermore, the post must be well-structured, with a clear introduction identifying the main points, a body that elaborates on each point with supporting evidence, and a conclusion that synthesizes the discussed material. Correct APA formatting involves in-text citations, references, and overall presentation in line with the latest Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th edition). Attention to grammar, spelling, and punctuation enhances readability and demonstrates professionalism.

Peer interaction is an integral part of the assignment, requiring students to respond substantively to at least two classmates' initial posts. These responses should go beyond superficial agreement or comments, providing scholarly insights, asking probing questions, or expanding upon the original posts. Including references to scholarly sources or examples from professional experience can deepen the discussion, encouraging further critical dialogue. Timeliness in responding is essential to maintain the flow of discussion and demonstrate engagement.

Overall, the successful completion of this assignment hinges on a balance of critical thinking, scholarly rigor, proper referencing, and active peer engagement. Students should aim to produce a post that is not only informative but also promotes ongoing discussion, reflective learning, and professional growth within the academic community.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
  • Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Prentice-Hall.
  • Crenshaw, J. (2017). Evidence-based practice in nursing: The research process. Routledge.
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Shinnick, M., & Woo, M. (2014). Critical thinking in nursing: Evidence-based practice and education. Springer Publishing Company.
  • Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • GCU Library. (2021). Using scholarly sources in academic research. Grand Canyon University.
  • American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. ANA.
  • Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Walker, J. (2018). Enhancing communication skills: Application in healthcare. Journal of Nursing Practice, 34(2), 45-52.

Related Assignments