Due 2000 New York Zone 2000dq 1: 250 Words In Length The Pur

Due 2000 New York Zone 2000dq 1 250 Words In Lengththe Purpose Of

The purpose of this discussion is to understand the growing concerns of consumerism and how the concept of consumerism is applied to varied contexts. Prepare and post a response to the following prompts: Describe consumerism. How is it applied in varied contexts? What is planned obsolescence? What are your personal beliefs and biases about consumption? Having separated your personal belief and bias and using your newly honed skills of ethical evaluation, present how you feel about consumerism and planned obsolescence as a societal issue using ethical theories and concepts.

Paper For Above instruction

Consumerism is a social and economic ideology that encourages the acquisition of goods and services in ever-increasing amounts. It emphasizes that personal happiness and societal progress are linked to consumer purchasing power, often equating material wealth with success. Consumerism manifests across varied contexts, from advertising and marketing to cultural norms and lifestyle choices. In the corporate realm, advertising industries craft persuasive messages that influence consumers’ desires, shaping behaviors and societal values. In environmental contexts, consumerism is implicated in overproduction, waste, and resource depletion, emphasizing the need for sustainable consumption practices. In the digital age, technology companies promote constant upgrades of devices, embedding the ideology that consumers need the latest models, reinforcing consumption cycles.

Planned obsolescence is a strategic practice where products are deliberately designed to have limited lifespans or become outdated quickly, compelling consumers to replace them sooner than necessary. This practice benefits manufacturers financially by encouraging continual consumption but raises ethical questions about wastefulness and environmental sustainability. It reflects a profit-driven mindset that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term ethical considerations.

Personally, I have complex beliefs about consumption that are influenced by environmental concerns and ethical considerations. I recognize that consumerism can drive economic growth and innovation but also perpetuate waste, inequality, and environmental degradation. I am biased against the excessive commercialization of daily life and the culture of disposability that encourages constant consumption of low-quality goods, which contributes to unsustainable practices.

Using ethical evaluation, I perceive consumerism and planned obsolescence as societal issues that pose moral challenges. From an utilitarian perspective, the widespread promotion of consumerism might produce greater happiness and economic efficiency but at significant environmental and social costs. Kantian ethics questions whether consumerism respects human dignity and autonomy or reduces individuals to passive recipients of marketing messages. Virtue ethics encourages fostering moderation, environmental stewardship, and responsible consumption as virtues vital to societal well-being. Overall, I believe that ethical consumerism involves promoting sustainable practices, product longevity, and corporate responsibility to align economic activity with environmental and social virtues.

Paper For Above instruction

The modern corporate landscape is dominated by organizations known as corporations, which are legally recognized entities separate from their owners, designed to conduct business activities. These entities possess defining characteristics such as limited liability, perpetual existence, and the ability to raise capital through shares of stock. Public corporations are those whose shares are traded openly on stock exchanges, allowing for broad investor participation. A conglomerate, on the other hand, is a large corporation that owns a controlling interest in multiple diverse companies, often spanning different industries. The key difference lies in scope and structure: while a corporation may operate in a single industry, a conglomerate manages a portfolio of varied businesses under a unified corporate umbrella.

Media conglomerates in the United States are typically organized as large corporations owning multiple media outlets, including television networks, radio stations, publishing companies, and digital platforms. An example is Comcast Corporation, which owns NBCUniversal, various cable channels, and internet providers. These parts work together strategically to maximize profits and market influence. For instance, content produced within NBCUniversal can be distributed across multiple platforms owned by Comcast, creating synergies that enhance advertising revenue and audience reach.

Ethically, media conglomerates wield significant influence over public opinion and access to information. While scale offers advantages such as resource efficiency and extensive reach, it also raises concerns about monopolistic tendencies, reduced diversity of viewpoints, and potential bias. The concentration of media ownership can suppress independent journalism and limit plurality, leading to ethical dilemmas around fairness and the public’s right to diverse perspectives.

Allowing large conglomerates to control mass media entails both benefits and drawbacks. On the positive side, they can invest in high-quality content, innovate technologically, and streamline operations. Conversely, their dominance risks monopolizing information, marginalizing minority voices, and prioritizing profit over social responsibility. Alternatives include promoting public broadcasting, nonprofit media organizations, and promoting local and community-based outlets. These alternatives could foster a more diverse and ethically grounded media landscape, emphasizing public interest and social virtues, possibly offering more morally sustainable models than concentrated corporate control.

References

• McChesney, R. W. (2013). Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the internet against democracy. New York: The New Press.
• Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (Eds.). (2013). Media regulation: Governance and the interests of citizens and consumers. Sage Publications.
• Schiller, D. (1996). Living essentially: The media and the construction of consumer reality. Routledge.
• Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.
• Bernays, E. L. (2005). Propaganda. Ipswich: Kessinger Publishing.
• McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. MIT Press.
• Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.
• Cook, G., & Jukes, S. (2014). The media and the public: How media influence politics and public opinion. Routledge.
• Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Thompson, J. B. (2013). Melancholy object: A literary history of bad feelings. Duke University Press.