Due 9/13 6 PM EST 250 Words Not Including References APA ✓ Solved

Due 913 6 Pm Est250 Words Not Including References APAaccording To T

According to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, the Masters prepared nurse "recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse applies research outcomes within the practice setting, resolves practice problems, works as a change agent, and disseminates results." Many research ideas emerge from practice and/or the educational environment. Formulating a well-built research question is challenging. Asking the right question facilitates the search process when conducting a review of the literature.

Read the article " Asking the clinical question: A key step in evidence-based practice." After reading the article, create your own PICOT question around the topic you selected that will be used for your Unit 2 Introduction to an Evidence-Based Practice Problem.

In your discussion post, complete the following: Describe your selected topic (HEALTHCARE EQUITY) and its significance. Share and discuss your created PICOT question. Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer-reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position. Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Healthcare equity refers to the principle that everyone has fair and just access to quality healthcare, regardless of socioeconomic status, ethnicity, geographic location, or other social determinants of health (Braveman et al., 2011). Achieving health equity is vital because disparities in healthcare can lead to poorer health outcomes among marginalized populations, exacerbating existing social inequalities (Williams & Jackson, 2005). Addressing healthcare equity is essential for promoting social justice, enhancing health outcomes, and ensuring that health services are accessible and effective for all populations.

Significance of Healthcare Equity

The significance of healthcare equity lies in its potential to reduce health disparities and improve overall population health. Rural populations, racial and ethnic minorities, and those with lower socioeconomic status often face barriers such as limited access to care, healthcare provider bias, and social determinants that adversely impact their health outcomes (Bach et al., 2011). As the United States grapples with persistent health disparities, there is a pressing need for targeted interventions that promote equity. Promoting healthcare equity contributes to a healthier, more just society where health outcomes are not determined by social or economic circumstances (Smedley et al., 2003).

Created PICOT Question

P: In adult patients within underserved urban communities

I: does implementing community-based health education programs

C: compared to standard care

O: improve health literacy and access to primary care services

T: over a 12-month period?

Discussion of PICOT Components

Population (P):

The target population includes adults residing in underserved urban areas where health disparities are prominent. This group often faces barriers to accessing healthcare, affecting their overall health outcomes (Bleich et al., 2012).

Intervention (I):

The intervention involves community-based health education programs tailored to improve understanding of health conditions, navigation of healthcare services, and preventive care measures. Such programs have been shown to enhance health literacy and engagement (Berkman et al., 2011).

Comparison (C):

Standard care, which typically involves routine clinical visits without additional community education initiatives, serves as the comparator. Evaluating the added value of targeted education programs against normal practice is essential to determine their effectiveness.

Outcome (O):

The expected outcomes include increased health literacy, improved access to primary care services, and potentially better health outcomes such as reduced hospitalization rates and better chronic disease management (Kobayashi et al., 2014).

Time (T):

The intervention’s effects are assessed over a 12-month period, aligning with timelines used in similar community health research to observe significant changes in health behaviors and access patterns.

Conclusion

Addressing healthcare equity through targeted interventions like community-based health education is critical for reducing disparities and promoting overall health. The PICOT question formulated provides a clear framework for investigating whether such interventions can effectively improve health literacy and access to care among underserved populations. Evidence from peer-reviewed studies supports the potential benefits of these programs, emphasizing their relevance in advancing health equity (O'Malley et al., 2012).

References

  • Bach, P. B., Pham, H. H., Schrag, D., Tate, R. C., & Deschamps, M. (2011). Primary care physicians’ links to other physicians: Does fragmentation affect the quality of care? Jama Internal Medicine, 171(9), 876–887.
  • Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S. L., Donahue, K. E., Halpern, D. J., & Crotty, K. (2011). Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(2), 97–107.
  • Bliech, S. K., Paasche-Orlow, M. K., & Schillinger, D. (2012). health literacy and health disparities: A systematic review. Journal of Health Communication, 17(sup3), 78–91.
  • Kobayashi, C., Shoji, K., & Tarumi, Y. (2014). Effectiveness of community-based health education to improve health literacy among urban adults. Public Health, 128(1), 18–24.
  • O'Malley, A. S., Sultan, S., Margolis, K., et al. (2012). Improving health care communication with vulnerable populations. Health Affairs, 31(12), 2738–2745.
  • Smedley, B. D., Stith, A. Y., & Nelson, A. R. (Eds.). (2003). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. The National Academies Press.
  • Williams, D. R., & Jackson, P. B. (2005). Social sources of racial disparities in health. Health Affairs, 24(2), 325–334.