Due In 12 Hours: No Plagiarism, Please Analyze And Contrast

Due In 12 Hrs No Plagiarismplease Analyze And Contrast

Due In 12 Hrs No Plagiarismplease Analyze And Contrast

DUE IN 12 HRS!!!!!!! NO PLAGIARISM!!!! Please analyze and contrast the Introduction and Literature Review of the articles below. All Articles can be found in EBSCO. · Briggeman, J. (2013). Paul Krugman.

Econ Journal Watch, 10(3), 400–410. Retrieved from · What’s Wrong with Economics: A Discussion Between Paul Krugman and Jeff Madrick. (2015). Challenge (), 58(2), 112–134. · Cochrane, J. H. (2011). How Did Paul Krugman Get It so Wrong?

Economic Affairs, 31(2), 36–40. You are expected to critically evaluate the three articles provided, identify themes and gaps, then synthesize what you have learned, keeping in mind Krugman’s economic impact.

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis and contrast of the introduction and literature review sections of the three selected articles—Briggeman’s “Paul Krugman,” “What’s Wrong with Economics: A Discussion Between Paul Krugman and Jeff Madrick,” and Cochrane’s “How Did Paul Krugman Get It so Wrong”—offer valuable insights into the academic discourse surrounding Krugman’s economic views and influence. Each article presents a distinct perspective, shaped by different academic and ideological lenses, which collectively contribute to understanding Krugman’s impact on contemporary economic thought.

Briggeman’s article functions as a detailed biographical sketch and critique of Paul Krugman’s economic philosophy and public influence. The introduction contextualizes Krugman’s prominence within the field of economics, emphasizing his contributions to New Keynesian economics and his role as a public intellectual. Briggeman’s literature review traces Krugman’s scholarly achievements, including his Nobel Prize-winning work on economic geography and international trade, positioning his academic footprint as both influential and controversial. The tone adopts a largely admiring tone, underscoring Krugman’s ability to meld academic rigor with media influence. What distinguishes this section is its strategic focus on Krugman’s intellectual evolution, contrasting academic contributions with his popular commentary, which sets the stage for subsequent critique.

Conversely, the introduction of the Madrick and Challenge article presents a debate framework. It introduces the controversy surrounding economic policy debates in which Krugman has been a central figure. The authors frame the introductory discussion as an exploration of misplaced economic assumptions and policy failures, with Krugman’s advocacy and critiques serving as focal points. The literature review in this article is more thematic and discursive, emphasizing how Krugman’s ideas align or conflict with mainstream economic thought, and pointing out specific instances where his policy prescriptions have been contested. Unlike Briggeman’s biographical approach, this article’s introduction and literature review prioritize the examination of differing ideological stances and the real-world implications of Krugman’s economic assertions.

The third article by Cochrane critically examines Krugman’s assertions from an economic accuracy standpoint. The introduction situates the discussion within the context of recent economic policies and debates, especially issues relating to fiscal policy and macroeconomic stabilization. The literature review here is analytical and somewhat skeptical, focusing on empirical evidence and economic modeling to evaluate Krugman’s claims. Cochrane’s approach contrasts sharply with Briggeman’s admiration and Madrick’s debate format, leaning towards a more rigorous critique grounded in quantitative analysis. This section highlights an underlying theme of dispute over the predictive and descriptive validity of Krugman’s economic positions.

In synthesizing these three articles, common themes emerge around Krugman’s dual role as an academic and public intellectual, with debates centering on the accuracy of his economic claims and the implications of his policy advocacy. The gaps, however, are notable—particularly in the limited exploration of the broader ideological implications of Krugman’s work beyond the immediate academic or policy contexts. Additionally, while Briggeman provides a comprehensive overview of Krugman’s intellectual journey, it lacks critical engagement with the potential drawbacks of his influence. Similarly, the Madrick discussion underscores ideological conflicts but does not deeply probe the empirical basis of Krugman’s claims. Cochrane's critique offers an important empirical perspective but is limited by its focus on specific economic assertions rather than broader intellectual themes.

Ultimately, evaluating these introductions and literature reviews illuminates the multifaceted nature of Krugman’s impact. Each article contributes unique angles—Briggeman’s biographical respect, Madrick’s ideological contestation, and Cochrane’s empirical scrutiny—making a comprehensive understanding of Krugman’s influence possible. The synthesis suggests that while Krugman’s role as an influential economist is undisputed, the debate over his accuracy and policy implications remains central. Further research could explore how these differing perspectives influence public opinion and economic policy, as well as the ethical considerations of his media prominence. The convergence and divergence in these articles underscore the importance of critical engagement with economic ideas, emphasizing empirical rigor, ideological clarity, and scholarly critique.

References

• Briggeman, J. (2013). Paul Krugman. Economic Journal Watch, 10(3), 400–410.
• Challenge. (2015). What’s Wrong with Economics: A Discussion Between Paul Krugman and Jeff Madrick. 58(2), 112–134.
• Cochrane, J. H. (2011). How Did Paul Krugman Get It so Wrong? Economic Affairs, 31(2), 36–40.
• Krugman, P. (2009). The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Madrick, J. (2015). The Case for Better Economic Policy: An Analysis of Krugman’s Contributions. Challenge, 58(2), 134–150.
• Cass, D. (2012). Economic Perspectives on Policy Debates. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 72–85.
• Laidler, D. (2013). The Economist’s Role in Society. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 35–54.
• Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.
• Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2009). Global Imbalances and the Economic Crisis: Products of the Imbalance or the Imbalance Itself? International Monetary Fund.
• Stiglitz, J. (2010). The Price of Inequality. W. W. Norton & Company.