Due In 2 Hours After Choosing Your Position From One Of The
Due In 2 Hoursafter Choosing Your Position From One Of The Topics List
Due in 2 hours After choosing your position from one of the topics listed in the assignment overview, find two scholarly sources to support your position. In two paragraphs of five to seven sentences, compare and contrast the points in each article to develop your position on the topic. should be logical, follow APA guidelines with in-text citations and references Topics: Advertising o Standardized testing o Gap year (students taking off one year between high school and college) o No Child Left Behind Act o Green energy (solar, wind, water, or another source of your choice) o Education and rehabilitation in jail o Technologies impact on children’s social skills o Unhealthy food banned from high schools o Obesity o Holistic medicine
Paper For Above instruction
The topic I have chosen to discuss is the impact of green energy initiatives, specifically focusing on solar and wind power, in promoting sustainable development and environmental conservation. The first scholarly article by Jacobson et al. (2015) advocates for the rapid transition to renewable energy sources as a means to combat climate change and reduce dependency on fossil fuels. This article emphasizes that solar and wind energy are the most feasible options to meet global energy demands while significantly lowering greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, the second article by Sovacool (2016) explores the economic and social challenges associated with the large-scale implementation of renewable energy, highlighting issues such as high initial costs and the intermittency of solar and wind power that require advanced storage solutions. While Jacobson et al. emphasize the environmental benefits and feasibility of renewable energy, Sovacool raises concerns about the practical limitations and infrastructural investments necessary for a successful transition. Therefore, integrating insights from both articles suggests that while green energy is essential for sustainable development, addressing economic and technological hurdles remains crucial to achieving its full potential.
Both articles fundamentally support the move toward renewable energy but differ in their focus and outlook. Jacobson et al. (2015) present a more optimistic view, emphasizing the abundance and technological maturity of solar and wind energy, which can be scaled rapidly to replace fossil fuels if policies support such transitions. Conversely, Sovacool (2016) adopts a more cautious approach, stressing that current technological limitations and economic costs pose significant obstacles that must be addressed through innovation, investment, and policy reforms. The first article also discusses the environmental imperatives of shifting to renewable energy, underscoring its benefits in reducing air pollution and mitigating climate change. Meanwhile, the second article highlights the social implications, such as job creation in renewable sectors but also potential disruptions in communities reliant on fossil fuel industries. In conclusion, although both articles support renewable energy development, a balanced approach that considers environmental benefits alongside economic and technological challenges is necessary to facilitate a sustainable energy future.
References
Jacobson, M. Z., Delucchi, M. A., Bazouin, G., et al. (2015). 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for 139 countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91, 144-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.113
Sovacool, B. K. (2016). How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.003