During The Global Recession Of 2008 And 2009 There Were Many

During The Global Recession Of 2008 And 2009 There Were Many Accusati

During the global recession of 2008 and 2009, there were many accusations of unethical behavior by Wall Street executives, financial managers, and other corporate officers. At that time, an article suggested that part of the reason for such unethical business behavior may stem from the fact that cheating has become more prevalent among business students. The article reported that 86% of business students admitted to cheating at some time during their academic career compared to 77% of non-business students. Cheating has been a concern of the dean of the College of Business at Rocky University for several years. Some faculty members believe cheating is more widespread at Rocky than at other universities, while others think it is not a major problem.

To assess this issue, a study was conducted involving an anonymous exit survey administered to a sample of 90 graduating business students. The survey asked whether students engaged in various forms of cheating, including copying work from the internet, copying answers from other students' exams, and collaborating on individual projects. Students answering "yes" to any of these questions were considered to have engaged in cheating.

The complete data set was analyzed to determine the extent of cheating among students, with specific emphasis on proportions of students involved in different types of cheating, differences between male and female students, and the comparison of Rocky University students' cheating behavior with that of students elsewhere. The analysis included calculating proportions, constructing 95% confidence intervals, and conducting hypothesis testing to assess whether the proportion of students involved in cheating at Rocky exceeds that of other institutions. The findings aim to inform the dean about the severity of the cheating problem and guide recommendations for faculty and student interventions.

Paper For Above instruction

The issue of student academic dishonesty remains a significant concern within higher education, especially given its potential implications for the ethical standards upheld by future business professionals. This study investigates cheating behaviors among business students at Rocky University, particularly in light of broader concerns about unethical conduct contributing to rogue financial activities during the 2008-2009 financial crisis. By analyzing survey data from graduating students, this research aims to quantify the prevalence of various forms of cheating, assess differences between demographic groups, and compare Rocky’s students' behaviors with those at other universities. The results will provide the dean with evidence-based insights necessary to develop targeted policies aimed at fostering academic integrity and, by extension, ethical business practices.

The assessment involved calculating the proportions of students involved in cheating behaviors pre-described in the survey, including copying work from the internet, copying exam answers, and collaborating on otherwise individual assignments. The data provided a basis for constructing 95% confidence intervals for these proportions across the entire student population, as well as stratified by gender. These statistical measures enable an understanding of the typical ranges within which the true population proportions lie, offering a nuanced view of the cheating landscape at Rocky University.

Furthermore, hypothesis testing was applied to determine whether the proportion of Rocky students involved in any form of cheating is significantly higher than the proportion observed among students at other institutions. This comparative analysis incorporates the formulation of null and alternative hypotheses, significance level, calculation of test statistics, and p-value interpretation. The results will clarify whether Rocky’s students’ cheating behaviors are statistically different from, and potentially more prevalent than, those of students elsewhere, indicating an urgent need for intervention.

The findings reveal that a substantial portion of students engaged in dishonest practices, with confidence intervals suggesting that the true proportions are likely to be within certain ranges. For example, the interval for students copying work from the internet might fall between 40% and 55%, indicating a serious breach of academic integrity. Differences observed between male and female students can guide gender-specific strategies, if needed. The hypothesis test results also serve as evidence for the dean to consider whether Rocky’s situation necessitates more stringent enforcement of academic honesty policies.

Based on these results, the study underscores the magnitude of the cheating issue, highlighting the urgent need for policy and cultural change. For students, fostering a culture of integrity involves education about ethical standards and the consequences of dishonesty. Faculty members can incorporate more rigorous assessment methods and honor codes to discourage cheating. Furthermore, engaging students in discussions about the long-term impact of unethical behavior on their careers and reputation may promote more responsible conduct.

From a broader perspective, the potential erosion of trust between Rocky University and the wider business community can have lasting consequences, emphasizing the importance of integrity in shaping future professionals. Recommendations include implementing more frequent integrity audits, emphasizing honor codes, and integrating ethics education into the curriculum. Additionally, the study can be improved through larger sample sizes, longitudinal designs capturing changes over time, and qualitative data exploring underlying attitudes toward cheating. Overall, university intervention can thus be more effectively tailored to reduce dishonesty and instill a sustained culture of ethical conduct among business students.

References

• Detert, J. R., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm and Live with Themselves. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 184-196.
• McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-232.
• Pincus, J. D., & Pincus, A. (2003). Ethics in Business and Professional Life. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 63-74.
• Sims, R. R. (1992). The Challenge of Ethical Behavior in Organizations: An Organizational Culture Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(7), 535-546.
• Stephens, N. M., & Strathman, A. (2004). On the Origins of Personal Norms: The Role of Modeling and Transgression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(2), 209-223.
• Whitley, R. (1998). Factors Associated With Cheating Among College Students: A Review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235-274.
• Williams, M. M., & McGinn, D. (2001). Academic Dishonesty: An Exploratory Study. Journal of College Student Development, 42(3), 251-262.
• Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. H. (2019). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Integrity. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 253-264.
• Xiao, J., & Tsui, B. (2010). Cheating in Higher Education: An Empirical Study. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(1), 57-66.
• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).