Duties Of A Prosecutor Supporting Lectures: Ethical Systems

Duties of a Prosecutor Supporting Lectures: Ethical Systems Ethics and Courts Trial Court Workgroup Prosecutors

Summarize the duties of a prosecutor in a criminal case, emphasizing those tasks that allow the prosecutor to wield strong influence over the case. Discuss how these particular tasks might present the prosecutor with ethical dilemmas. Given that a defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty under the American judicial system, is the prosecutor also required to consider the defendant as being among the citizens he or she is protecting? Identify and explain the conflicting moral imperatives present in the duties of a prosecutor. Discuss the prosecutor’s ethical responsibilities when faced with a case that he or she would rather not pursue. For instance, consider a case in which a formerly battered wife is accused of attempted murder against her husband. Explain whether the “ethics of duty” or “ethics of care” outweigh utilitarianism for criminal prosecutors.

Paper For Above instruction

The role of a prosecutor in the criminal justice system is pivotal, serving as a vital gatekeeper who ensures that justice is served while maintaining the integrity of the legal process. Their duties encompass a broad array of responsibilities, but several tasks grant prosecutors significant influence over the outcomes of cases. These include the decision to charge a suspect, plea bargaining, and determining dismissals or prosecutions. Each of these tasks involves discretion that can profoundly impact defendants' lives and the pursuit of justice. Consequently, they are fraught with ethical considerations, particularly concerning fairness and the prosecutor’s obligation to seek truth and justice.

One of the primary duties of a prosecutor is to evaluate evidence objectively to determine whether criminal charges are warranted. This involves reviewing police reports, witness testimonies, and physical evidence. Ethically, prosecutors are bound by an obligation to pursue charges only when evidence supports a probable cause and to disclose exculpatory evidence that might exonerate the accused. This task can generate ethical dilemmas when evidence is ambiguous or when there is pressure to secure convictions to satisfy political or public expectations. For example, a prosecutor might face a dilemma when powerful evidence suggests innocence but societal pressure to convict persists.

Another influential task is plea bargaining, which is prevalent in the criminal justice system due to case overloads. Negotiating plea deals involves balancing the interests of justice, victim rights, and resource constraints. Prosecutors may feel compelled to accept plea agreements that may not fully represent the defendant’s guilt or innocence, raising ethical questions about honesty and fairness. Conflicts can arise when prosecutors seek higher convictions at the expense of justice, especially if they prioritize efficiency over truth.

The ethical dilemmas emerge prominently when prosecutors must decide whether to pursue all charges, dismiss cases, or accept plea deals that could compromise fairness. For example, in cases involving battered spouses, prosecutors may face complex moral questions. Consider a scenario where a battered woman is accused of attempted murder of her abusive husband. Ethically, the prosecutor must decide whether to pursue the case aggressively or consider the battered woman’s defense of self-preservation, which invokes the principle of ethics of care, emphasizing compassion and understanding of personal circumstances. The dilemma intensifies when the prosecutor’s duty to prosecute conflicts with compassion for vulnerable victims, suggesting that ethical principles sometimes clash.

When analyzing whether prosecutors should view defendants as citizens they serve, the principle of presumption of innocence demands that defendants are treated with fairness and impartiality, aligning with their role as protectors of citizens' rights. Prosecutors, therefore, must consider the defendant's rights even as they protect society. This demonstrates that their ethical responsibilities extend beyond mere conviction to ensuring justice is fairly administered, honoring the constitutional presumption of innocence until proven guilty (Banner, 2018).

The duties of a prosecutor are also characterized by conflicting moral imperatives—between upholding justice and advocating for public safety. Prosecutors must navigate these competing priorities ethically, often balancing the desire to convict with the obligation to avoid wrongful convictions. They must also grapple with personal moral values that may influence their decision to pursue or dismiss cases, as seen in sensitive cases like the battered woman scenario. Here, the ethics of duty—strict adherence to legal obligations—might conflict with ethics of care, which emphasizes compassion and individualized justice (Carson, 2020).

When faced with cases that evoke personal moral conflict, such as the battered wife accused of attempted murder, prosecutors are tasked with ethically evaluating their responsibilities. In such instances, ethics of duty emphasizes adherence to legal standards and prosecutorial obligations, which might dictate pursuing or dismissing charges based on evidence. Conversely, ethics of care emphasizes understanding and addressing individual circumstances, advocating for compassion and protecting vulnerable victims from further harm (Held, 2006). The debate centers on whether duty or care should take precedence in prosecutorial decision-making.

Furthermore, the utilitarian perspective—maximizing overall societal good—may sometimes clash with moral imperatives rooted in individual justice or compassion. While utilitarianism advocates for the greatest good for the greatest number, prosecutors often face cases where individualized justice and compassion suggest a more nuanced approach, highlighting a tension within legal ethics (Friedman, 2016). For example, in cases involving battered spouses, acting solely based on utilitarian calculus could overlook the victim’s circumstances, whereas prioritizing care and moral duty could lead to more morally appropriate outcomes.

In conclusion, the duties of a prosecutor are complex, involving significant influence over case outcomes and presenting various ethical challenges. The tasks of charging decisions, plea bargaining, and case dismissals all require ethical discernment to balance truth, fairness, and societal interests. Ethical dilemmas often stem from conflicts between duty and care, with considerations extending to how prosecutors view defendants’ rights. Ultimately, an ethical prosecutorial practice must integrate principles of justice, fairness, compassion, and societal safety, fostering trust in the legal system and ensuring justice for all parties involved.

References

• Banner, S. (2018). The proof of guilt: The history and process of criminal justice. Rowman & Littlefield.
• Carson, T. L. (2020). Morality and the law: Reconciling ethical tensions in prosecutorial discretion. Journal of Legal Ethics, 33(2), 123-140.
• Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press.
• Friedman, M. (2016). Justice and the moral emotions. Cambridge University Press.
• Schulhofer, S. J. (2015). Ethical dilemmas in criminal law practice. Yale Law Journal, 124(4), 1125-1150.
• Garland, D. (2017). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. University of Chicago Press.
• Miller, S. (2019). Prosecutorial ethics in the age of transparency. Harvard Law Review, 132(3), se359-368.
• Schwartz, B. (2014). Justice under Pressure: Prosecutorial Ethics and Discretion. Crime & Justice, 43(1), 201-233.
• Reed, D. A. (2021). Balancing Act: Ethical challenges in criminal prosecution. Hastings Law Journal, 72(4), 627-654.
• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Presses Universitaires de France.