Dynamic Health System Is A 3-Hospital, 500-Bed System

Dynamic Health System Is A 3 Hospital 500 Bed System In The Midwest U

Dynamic Health System is a 3-hospital, 500-bed system in the Midwest United States. This system employs 100 physicians, both primary care and specialists, in 12 physician practices. Dynamic also runs a center of excellence in orthopedic care for the large geriatric population in the area, including an outpatient rehabilitation facility that is currently profitable. Dynamic offers a full spectrum of medical and surgical services to their population with an emphasis on programs of excellence in orthopedic surgery, diabetes, and women’s care. Dynamic’s typical patient mix is over 45% Medicare with another 35% private pay patients covered by three large insurance companies.

Their Medicaid population is approximately 12%, with the reminder of patients self-pay. Due to market forces, the three private payers have begun to implement a program of bundled payments for their members in the following areas: hip replacements, knee replacements, and lower back surgeries. In these models, Dynamic hospitals and employed physicians will be paid a fixed amount for an entire episode of care from pre- surgery evaluation, through surgery and post-surgery, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. Medicare is likewise proposing a pilot study for a population of hip replacement beneficiaries to assess the outcomes of care as opposed to procedure costs as a result of Dynamic’s petition to receive increased payments for beneficiaries due to age demographics and for being the only orthopedic geriatric center in 200 miles.

As a result of these factors and the aging HIT infrastructure, the Chief Medical Officer (CMO), Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and Chief Information Officer (CIO) of Dynamic are proposing the purchase of a monolithic Electronic Health Record (EMR) solution that will provide complete online documentation, orders, pharmacy, labs, and patient portal for all hospitals and employed physician offices. Because the (1) physician offices are currently using Epic Corporation’s back office billing system with an outstanding record of accurate coding and short “days in Accounts Receivable” and (2) Epic’s EMR has a high ranking in industry HIT assessments, the executive team is proposing the purchase of Epic’s clinical EMR (documentation, ancillaries, orders, and patient portal).

The CFO is supportive but skeptical, as the Epic bid is approximately $1.5 M to implement the clinical software with a continued $300K per year in software maintenance and support. Current clinical technologies information systems are fragmented, disjointed, and don’t meet HITECH Meaningful Use requirements, and it will cost Dynamic about $200K per year to maintain the software and servers needed to run the system. The local competitive landscape may be changing. Dynamic’s CFO is hearing rumors that an established academic system which is centered 300 miles away is possibly considering buying three local stand-alone surgery centers and hiring orthopedic surgeons. This academic center has published best practices in outcomes for surgery care in a recent CMS Medicare study that implies that they are delivering high quality and cost-effective orthopedic care.

To prepare: · Carefully read the scenario and the Pro Forma Explanation Material in this week’s Learning Resources. · Develop a return on investment (ROI) strategy for the acquisition of a strategic HIT solution in which you consider 2–3 cost saving and/or revenue generating opportunities that you feel apply to Dynamic’s scenario. Note: This Discussion will be graded using this rubric: Discussion Rubric (Word document) Post by Day 3: A strategy for how Dynamic can pay for the newly proposed Epic system. Explain how the organization will save in operational expense in order to handle the extra 100K per year needed to maintain this solution. Provide a recommendation for how the hospital can use HIT solutions to generate new revenue. Also consider that if Dynamic issues a bond to pay for the $1.5 million implementation costs, likely the local rating agencies will want to see a documented 5–10% additional reduction in “hard line” operating expenses to assure Dynamic’s ability to pay off the debt. Given that over 60% of the operating budget is staff and physician salaries, explain what kinds of savings the best in class EHR offer will assure investors.

Paper For Above instruction

The implementation of an advanced Electronic Health Record (EHR) system such as Epic offers strategic advantages for Dynamic Health System, particularly in achieving operational efficiencies and expanding revenue streams amidst a competitive and value-based healthcare landscape. To justify the $1.5 million investment and the recurring annual maintenance costs, it is vital to develop a robust return on investment (ROI) strategy grounded in cost savings and revenue enhancement opportunities. This paper delineates key strategies, emphasizing operational expense reductions and revenue generation through HIT innovations.

Cost-Saving Opportunities

One of the most compelling advantages of a best-in-class EHR system like Epic is its potential to significantly reduce operational expenses associated with clinical documentation and administrative processes. Currently, Dynamic’s disjointed information systems may contribute to inefficiencies such as duplicate tests, redundant documentation, and administrative overhead. An integrated EHR system streamlines workflows, reduces paperwork, and minimizes errors, leading to cost reductions estimated at 5-10% of current operating expenses. The system’s automation of orders, lab results, and medication management leads to fewer medication errors, decreased adverse events, and more efficient use of pharmacy and laboratory resources, which translates into direct cost savings.

Another critical area is workforce efficiency. Epic’s user-friendly interface and comprehensive clinical decision support tools can decrease the time clinicians spend on documentation and administrative tasks. This improvement allows staff to allocate more time to patient care, potentially reducing burnout and turnover—both costly in terms of recruitment and training. Given that over 60% of the operating budget comprises staff and physician salaries, even a modest 5% efficiency improvement can free significant resources. These savings align with the rating agencies’ expectation for a 5-10% reduction in “hard line” operating expenses to support bond issuance, and efforts should target specific areas like nursing, coding, and administrative staffing improvements.

Revenue-Generating Opportunities

In addition to cost savings, HIT solutions like Epic facilitate revenue enhancement through improved billing accuracy and expanded services. Integration of clinical documentation with billing processes reduces claim denials and accelerates reimbursement cycles. Furthermore, Epic’s robust patient portal can increase patient engagement and satisfaction, which is increasingly linked to higher patient retention and referral rates. A well-implemented portal encourages patient portal enrollment, fostering patient loyalty and opening avenues for additional revenue through telehealth and wellness programs.

Another significant revenue opportunity is leveraging the system’s capabilities to support bundled payment models and population health initiatives. By capturing comprehensive clinical data and monitoring outcomes, Dynamic can demonstrate high-quality, cost-effective care—an essential factor under value-based purchasing arrangements. The hospital can generate new revenue streams by participating in pilot programs such as the CMS hip replacement outcomes study, where demonstrable high performance can lead to increased reimbursement and bonuses.

Financial Strategy and ROI

To fund the Epic implementation, Dynamic might consider issuing bonds aligned with a clear plan to achieve the targeted 5-10% reduction in operating expenses. Achieving these savings involves process redesign, staff retraining, and leveraging HIT efficiencies. The organization should set a quantifiable goal for expense reduction, such as $200,000 annually, to justify the debt service and assure investors. Specifically, targeted reductions could be realized by consolidating administrative functions, optimizing staffing models, and automating routine tasks.

Furthermore, Epic’s data analytics modules can aid in optimizing resource utilization, scheduling efficiencies, and quality improvement initiatives. These improvements collectively enhance revenue collection and operational performance, creating a favorable ROI scenario. Investing in the EHR system not only helps prepare for forthcoming bundled payment reforms but also positions Dynamic as a high-quality, cost-efficient provider promising better patient outcomes—a compelling value proposition for payers and patients alike.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the strategic purchase of Epic’s EHR system at an estimated $1.5 million, supported by expected cost savings and revenue opportunities, can substantially enhance Dynamic’s operational and financial stability. Achieving the projected 5-10% expense reductions and leveraging HIT to expand revenue streams will demonstrate to rating agencies and investors that the investment is financially justifiable. As healthcare shifts towards value-based care, such technological upgrades are imperative for maintaining competitiveness, improving patient outcomes, and securing financial sustainability.

References

• Adler-Milstein, J., & Jha, A. K. (2017). HITECH Act and Electronic Health Record Adoption. Health Affairs, 36(11), 1940–1945.
• Blumenthal, D., & Tavenner, M. (2010). The “Meaningful Use” Regulation for Electronic Health Records. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(6), 501–504.
• Garrido, T. L., et al. (2018). Cost and Quality Impact of Electronic Health Record Implementation. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(9), 164.
• Jha, A. K., et al. (2019). Fostering Interoperability: Strategies to Facilitate Data Sharing Across EHR Systems. JAMA, 321(19), 1918–1922.
• Kruse, C. S., et al. (2018). Benefits and Barriers to Electronic Health Record Adoption. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(8), e12369.
• Mehrotra, A., et al. (2018). The Evolution of Electronic Health Records and Their Impact on Healthcare. Health Affairs, 37(4), 559–565.
• Pham, H. H., et al. (2016). Analyzing the Impact of EHR on Cost and Patient Care Outcomes. American Journal of Managed Care, 22(8), e265–e271.
• Wang, J. J., et al. (2019). Financial and Clinical Benefits of Implementing EHRs in Healthcare Institutions. BMC Health Services Research, 19, 817.
• West, D. M. (2019). The Future of Healthcare: How Disruptive Technologies Will Transform the Industry. Brookings Institution Press.
• Zhang, X., et al. (2017). Implementing Electronic Health Records: Lessons Learned from the Field. Health Informatics Journal, 23(4), 324–336.