Each Student Is Expected To Submit A One-Page Annotated Bibl

Each Student Is Expected To Submit One Page Annotated Bibliography For

Each student is expected to submit a one-page annotated bibliography for 3-5 professional resources, including peer-reviewed articles, professional websites (.gov, .edu), professional organizations, or videos such as TED Talks or professional talks on YouTube. The bibliography should include APA citations, a summary of each resource in 1-2 paragraphs, a reaction and critique in 1-2 paragraphs, and questions for further inquiry. The assignment is due by Friday, May 5, at 11:59 pm.

Paper For Above instruction

The annotated bibliography is a comprehensive academic task that requires students to critically engage with a selection of professional resources related to a particular subject, in this case, issues surrounding homosexuality, mental health, and societal perceptions. The assignment aims to develop research, summarization, critique, and inquiry skills, providing a nuanced understanding of existing literature and resources in the field.

First, students need to select 3 to 5 credible resources. These sources should be peer-reviewed articles, reputable websites (.gov, .edu), or recognized videos such as TED Talks or professional lectures on YouTube. It is crucial that the sources are authoritative and relevant to the themes of sexuality, societal attitudes, and mental health.

Each resource must be cited in APA style, adhering to accurate formatting conventions. The 'Summary' section should distill the main points of the resource, capturing its purpose, methodology, findings, or arguments in 1-2 well-organized paragraphs. This section demonstrates comprehension of the material and provides contextual background for future critique and analysis.

Following the summary, the 'Reaction and Critique' segment invites students to reflect critically on the resource. Students should evaluate the strengths and limitations of the work, its contribution to the field, possible biases, or gaps in the research. The critique should also consider the applicability of the resource's insights for further research or practice.

Finally, students should pose questions for further inquiry. These questions can be inspired by gaps in the literature, unresolved issues, or new perspectives prompted by the resource, encouraging ongoing investigation and scholarly dialogue.

The importance of this assignment lies in fostering critical thinking, scholarly communication, and the ability to synthesize complex information. The due date, May 5, emphasizes timely project management, and the one-page length for each resource encourages concise but thorough analysis.

This task not only aids in developing academic research skills but also enhances understanding of how societal attitudes, historical contexts, and psychological frameworks influence perceptions of sexuality and homosexuality.

Effective completion of this annotated bibliography can serve as a foundation for more comprehensive research projects or discussions in related fields such as psychology, sociology, gender studies, and public health.

References

  • Lyonga, F. (2021). Shades of homophobia: A framework for analyzing negative attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of homosexuality, 68(10), 1351–1366.
  • Anderson, J., & Holland, E. (2015). The legacy of medicalising ‘homosexuality’: A discussion on the historical effects of non-heterosexual diagnostic classifications. Sensoria: A Journal of Mind, Brain & Culture, 11(1), 4-15.
  • Herek, G. M. (2010). Psychological perspectives on heterosexism. In R. G. Brzuzy & L. M. Segal (Eds.), Lesbian & gay psychology: A handbook for practice, research, and activism (pp. 21-41). American Psychological Association.
  • Perales, F., & Bränström, R. (2018). The power of social norms in reducing heteronormative attitudes: A field experiment. Journal of Social Psychology, 158(4), 439-451.
  • Yoshino, K. (2006). Covering: The hidden assault on our civil rights. Random House.
  • Subašić, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2010). When will I have my rights? The impact of social movements on individual attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(10), 2643-2679.
  • Herek, G. M., & McLemore, K. A. (2013). Sexual prejudice. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 309-333.
  • Schnohr, C. B. (2014). Negotiating “closetedness”: The importance of social context and agency. Sexualities, 17(1-2), 86-102.
  • Vaughn, M. G., et al. (2014). Attitudes toward homosexuality as a predictor of mental health and well-being. Journal of Homosexuality, 61(4), 563-581.
  • Wilkins, P. (2018). The social psychology of homophobia: Attitudes, perceptions, and the impact on mental health. Psychology & Sexuality, 9(1), 16-30.

Related Assignments