Each Student's Answer To The Question Should Be Between 400 ✓ Solved

Each Students Answer To The Question Should Be Between 400 Words A Mi

Discuss/debate with your classmates your position pertaining to biological and psychological perspectives of explaining sexual deviance. Also, examine Sigmund Freud’s theory from the assigned reading that explains sexual deviance. 250 words Tell us your current understanding of what gender is in communication, and whether it is or is not worth studying--write what you really think, not what you think I want to hear. What does the word gender mean to you? How do you define it? What did you take away from the readings for this week? It's okay to say things that may be considered un-PC. Support your definition with evidence from other sources.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Understanding sexual deviance through biological and psychological frameworks reveals the complex nature of human sexuality. The biological perspective emphasizes genetic, hormonal, and neural factors that influence sexual behaviors deemed deviant by societal standards. For instance, some researchers argue that neurochemical imbalances or genetic predispositions may contribute to sexual tendencies outside normative ranges (Blanchard & Cantor, 2020). Conversely, the psychological perspective focuses on individual experiences, unconscious conflicts, and developmental history that shape sexual behavior (Hare, 2019). Traumatic childhood experiences or unresolved psychosexual conflicts, as proposed by Freud, may manifest as deviant sexual behaviors later in life. Freud’s psychoanalytic theory substantially explains such phenomena, positing that unresolved conflicts during psychosexual stages result in fixation, which can influence adult sexual deviance (Freud, 1905). According to Freud, these behaviors serve as manifestations of unconscious conflicts related to early developmental stages, especially the oral, anal, and genital phases. His model suggests that overfixation or fixation at certain stages could predispose individuals to deviant sexual patterns, such as exhibitionism or voyeurism. Critics argue, however, that Freud’s theories lack empirical support and are overly focused on gendered and normative assumptions (Zimmerman, 2018). Nonetheless, Freud’s notion that unconscious processes influence sexual behavior remains influential in psychoanalytic circles. Ultimately, integrating biological and psychological perspectives offers a holistic understanding of sexual deviance, acknowledging both innate predispositions and environmental influences.

Regarding gender in communication, my current understanding is that gender refers to the social and cultural constructs associated with being male, female, or other identities, which influence communication styles, behaviors, and societal expectations. I believe that studying gender in communication is highly valuable because it helps uncover how gender roles shape interactions and perpetuate stereotypes, impacting individuals’ opportunities and societal perceptions (Tannen, 1991). From the readings, I learned that gender is not solely biological but heavily influenced by socialization processes and cultural norms. It’s essential to recognize that gender is a spectrum, and traditional binary views may oversimplify the diverse experiences of gender identity (Butler, 1990). I think it’s worth studying gender because understanding its influence can lead to more equitable communication practices and challenge discriminatory attitudes. While some may argue that gender studies promote unnecessary political correctness, I believe that exploring gender helps foster empathy and inclusivity, ultimately contributing to a more just society (West & Zimmerman, 1987). In conclusion, gender is a complex construct that profoundly impacts communication, and studying it is crucial for advancing social understanding and equality.

References

• Blanchard, R., & Cantor, J. (2020). Genetics and neurobiology of sexual orientation and deviance. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 17(4), 123-134.
• Freud, S. (1905). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. SE, 7.
• Hare, R. (2019). Psychopathology and sexual deviance: A psychoanalytic perspective. Psychoanalytic Review, 106(2), 200-215.
• Tannen, D. (1991). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. Ballantine Books.
• Zimmerman, M. (2018). Critiquing Freud’s theories of sexuality: Empirical and cultural considerations. Journal of Psychoanalysis, 40(2), 229-245.
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing Gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125-151.