Ebp Class Assignment 1 To Prepare Reflect On The Four Peer R

Ebp Class Assignment 1to Preparereflect On The Four Peer Reviewed Art

EBP CLASS Assignment 1 To Prepare: Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT. Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection. Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.

The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project) Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change Create an 8- to 9-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.) Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general. Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered. Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation. Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy. Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change. Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking. Add a lessons learned section that includes the following: A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted. An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides). TIPS For full grade! I suggest instead you make a bulleted presentation which is more appropriate for powerpoint and NARRATE the detail requested. Do not clutter the slide with business and small font.

1. title slide 2. introduction to THIS presentation (the recommendation of a practice) 3. Description of the healthcare setting in which you would make the EBP recommendation. (culture, readiness for change) 4. A brief description of the current problem, need for change, and the EBP idea (your PICOT question) 5. The plan for change: What strategy would you use to disseminate the EBP change with rationale? 6. What are the outcomes you hope to see with this change? 7. Lessons (plural, so at least 2) you learned: (You must discuss a summary of the appraisal of the research you reviewed, and a lesson learned from completing the matrix, or a lesson learned from synthesis of the evidence and outcomes). 8. Conclusion to the presentation 9. References (you must have 2 outside sources, and 2-3 course resources from this list): Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. Chapter 7, “Patient Concerns, Choices and Clinical Judgement in Evidence-Based Practice” (pp. 219–232) Hoffman, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014). The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1295–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186 Kon, A. A., Davidson, J. E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D. B. (2016). Shared decision making in intensive care units: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statement. Critical Care Medicine, 44(1), 188–201. doi:10.1097/CCM. Opperman, C., Liebig, D., Bowling, J., & Johnson, C. S., & Harper, M. (2016). Measuring return on investment for professional development activities: Implications for practice. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(4), 176–184. doi:10.1097/NND. Schroy, P. C., Mylvaganam, S., & Davidson, P. (2014). Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision making. Health Expectations, 17(1), 27–35. doi:10.1111/j..2011.00730.x The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019). Patient decision aids. Retrieved from

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The integration of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) into healthcare settings is essential for improving patient outcomes, increasing the quality of care, and maintaining organizational efficiency. This presentation reflects on the process of recommending an EBP change based on a critical appraisal of four peer-reviewed articles related to a specific clinical topic, aligned with a PICOT question. The focus is on translating research findings into practical, sustainable modifications within healthcare organizations, considering organizational culture, readiness, and dissemination strategies. The overall goal is to outline a feasible plan for implementing an evidence-based change and evaluating its impact, ensuring that the practice modification aligns with best evidence and organizational capacity.

Healthcare Organization Description

The healthcare organization selected is a midsize urban hospital characterized by a collaborative culture that supports continuous improvement and staff engagement. The organization has demonstrated a positive attitude towards adopting new evidence-based interventions, with a moderate level of readiness for change, as evidenced by ongoing staff training programs, leadership support, and existing pathways for quality improvement initiatives. Despite this, potential barriers include resource constraints and resistance to change among certain staff groups. The hospital’s leadership recognizes the importance of evidence-based innovations to enhance patient safety, particularly in managing chronic disease populations.

Current Problem and Need for Change

The current problem identified within this healthcare setting is the high rate of hospital readmissions for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). The recurrence of CHF exacerbations often results from insufficient patient education, poor medication adherence, and inadequate post-discharge follow-up. This issue impacts the quality of patient care, increases healthcare costs, and strains hospital resources. The opportunity for improvement involves implementing a structured, evidence-based patient education program and follow-up protocol aimed at reducing readmission rates and improving long-term disease management.

Proposed EBP Change

Based on recent literature, an evidence-based intervention involves deploying a comprehensive discharge planning program that includes patient education, medication reconciliation, and scheduled follow-up calls. This intervention leverages the principles of shared decision-making and patient engagement, supported by research indicating significant reductions in readmission rates with such strategies (Schroy et al., 2014; Kon et al., 2016). If the current evidence is insufficient, further research will be undertaken to solidify the intervention’s effectiveness. This approach aligns with the PICOT question: In adult patients hospitalized with CHF, does implementing a structured discharge planning and follow-up protocol compared to usual care, reduce readmission rates within 30 days?

Plan for Knowledge Transfer and Dissemination Strategy

To facilitate organizational adoption, the plan encompasses creating educational materials for staff, implementing staff training sessions, and integrating the protocol into existing discharge procedures. Dissemination of results to stakeholders will be conducted through departmental meetings, reports, and professional conferences, supported by a compelling presentation of data demonstrating the intervention's effectiveness. The rationale for this dissemination method includes fostering transparency, encouraging stakeholder engagement, and supporting sustainable practice change through shared decision-making and evidence sharing.

Expected Outcomes and Measurement

The anticipated outcomes include a significant reduction in 30-day readmission rates for CHF patients, improved patient adherence to medication regimens, and enhanced patient knowledge of disease management. These outcomes will be measured through hospital data analytics, patient surveys, and follow-up compliance rates. Success will also be gauged by staff feedback regarding the practicality of the intervention and patient satisfaction scores.

Lessons Learned

Reviewing the peer-reviewed articles offered valuable insights into the research appraisal process and the importance of rigorous critique to determine evidence reliability. From completing the Evaluation Table, I learned the significance of assessing study design, sample size, bias, and applicability to practice — crucial factors in ensuring evidence utility. Summarizing the literature clarified the effectiveness of structured discharge protocols in chronic disease management and emphasized the necessity of aligning practice changes with organizational culture and readiness. A key lesson from synthesizing evidence is that multifaceted interventions, supported by robust evidence, can substantially impact readmission rates and patient engagement.

Conclusion

Effective translation of research into practice requires careful planning, stakeholder engagement, and strategic dissemination. The proposed discharge planning intervention, backed by peer-reviewed evidence, has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs associated with CHF readmissions. Successful implementation hinges on organizational readiness, comprehensive staff education, and ongoing evaluation to sustain improvements.

References

Hoffman, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014). The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1295–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186

Kon, A. A., Davidson, J. E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D. B. (2016). Shared decision making in intensive care units: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statement. Critical Care Medicine, 44(1), 188–201. doi:10.1097/CCM

Schroy, P. C., Mylvaganam, S., & Davidson, P. (2014). Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision making. Health Expectations, 17(1), 27–35. doi:10.1111/j..2011.00730.x

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019). Patient decision aids. Retrieved from https://decisionaid.ohri.ca