Eh 1020 English Composition II Course Learning Outcom 974616

Eh 1020 English Composition Ii 1course Learning Outcomes For Unit Iv

Identify parts of an argument through persuasive writing. Produce an argumentative research paper.

Paper For Above instruction

In the realm of academic and professional writing, the ability to craft persuasive arguments and produce well-structured research papers is essential. The course outcomes for Unit IV of EH 1020 English Composition II emphasize two pivotal skills: understanding the structural components of an argument through persuasive writing and developing comprehensive argumentative research papers. This essay explores these learning outcomes by examining their significance, the skills required, and strategies to achieve mastery in these areas.

Firstly, understanding the parts of an argument is fundamental to effective persuasive writing. An argument is a coherent series of reasons, statements, or facts intended to support or establish a point of view. Recognizing its parts—such as the claim, evidence, warrants, rebuttals, and conclusions—enables students to analyze, construct, and evaluate persuasive texts critically. For instance, the claim is the main position or stance, which the writer aims to prove. Supporting evidence provides the factual basis or logical reasoning, while warrants link evidence to the claim. Rebuttals acknowledge counterarguments, reinforcing the writer’s position by addressing potential objections. Mastery of these parts allows students to dissect complex arguments, identify fallacious reasoning, and develop their own persuasive messages effectively.

Developing an understanding of argument components also enhances critical thinking skills, which are crucial across academic disciplines and real-world situations. As students learn to identify these parts within texts, they become more adept at constructing their own persuasive messages with clarity and coherence. For example, when writing an argumentative essay on climate change, a student must clearly state their claim (urgent action is needed), support it with scientific evidence, justify the connection between evidence and claim with warrants, and preempt counterarguments by addressing skeptics’ points. This structured approach results in compelling arguments that can influence opinions or inspire action.

Secondly, producing an argumentative research paper builds upon the previous skill by requiring students to gather, evaluate, and synthesize information from multiple credible sources. A well-crafted research paper not only presents an argument but also supports it with substantial evidence, demonstrating depth of understanding and academic integrity. The process involves several stages: selecting a debatable topic, conducting comprehensive research, outlining the paper's structure, and writing with clarity and purpose.

The research process demands critical evaluation of sources to discern credible, relevant, and unbiased information. Students learn to differentiate between peer-reviewed journal articles, reputable news outlets, and less reliable sources. Incorporating these diverse sources enables the construction of a nuanced argument that considers multiple perspectives. Furthermore, proper citation and adherence to academic integrity standards are vital to lend credibility to the work and avoid plagiarism.

Effective argumentative research papers follow a structured format: introduction with a clear thesis statement; body paragraphs presenting evidence and analysis; counterargument sections addressing opposing viewpoints; and a conclusion that summarizes and reinforces the thesis. For example, in a paper about renewable energy, the student would introduce the importance of sustainability, present evidence on solar and wind power efficiency, address criticisms related to cost or geographic limitations, and conclude with a call for policy change.

Achieving proficiency in these outcomes also involves mastering the art of persuasive strategies such as appealing to ethos (credibility), pathos (emotion), and logos (logic). Balancing these appeals while maintaining a respectful tone makes arguments more compelling. Additionally, effective organization and seamless transitions enhance readability and reinforce the logical flow of ideas.

In conclusion, mastering the ability to identify parts of an argument through persuasive writing and producing a well-supported argumentative research paper are essential skills in academic writing. These skills facilitate critical thinking, enhance communication clarity, and enable students to engage effectively in scholarly debates and societal dialogues. To attain mastery, students must practice analyzing and constructing arguments, critically evaluate sources, and adhere to structured formats that communicate ideas persuasively. By doing so, they prepare themselves not only for academic success but also for informed citizenship and professional communication.

References

  • eHelp Education. (2020). Foundations of Argumentative Writing. Retrieved from https://www.ehelp.edu/argumentative-writing
  • Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (4th ed.). Norton.
  • Lunsford, A. A. (2018). The Everyday Writer (6th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's.
  • Ramage, J. D., & Bean, J. C. (2018). The Allyn & Bacon Guide to Persuasive Writing. Pearson.
  • Thompson, L. (2019). The Art of Argument. Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Harris, R. (2014). The Nature of Argument. University of North Carolina Press.
  • Johnson, R. H., & Blair, J. A. (2017). Logical Reasoning (12th ed.). Pearson.
  • Booth, W. C., Colomb, G., & Williams, J. M. (2016). The Craft of Research (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  • Fahnestock, J. (2011). Rhetorical Style: The Use of Language in Persuasive Discourse. Oxford University Press.
  • American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA Publishing.

Related Assignments