Either An Experiment Or An Observational Study May Be Used ✓ Solved
Either An Experiment Or An Observational Study May Be Used To Detect A
Either an experiment or an observational study may be used to detect an association between a response variable and an explanatory variable. Explain why confounding (lurking) variables are a problem in the following observational study. Your explanation should be specific for this study. "A study was conducted to determine if studying Latin in high school had an impact on college success. The college GPAs of a group of randomly selected students who mastered Latin in high school were compared to the college GPAs of a group of randomly selected students who did not take Latin in high school. The GPAs of the students who mastered Latin were found to be significantly higher on average than the GPAs of the other group, so the researchers concluded that mastering Latin in high school resulted in higher grades in college."
In a recent study on veterinary practices, 25 cases of negligence were discovered at ten randomly selected large veterinary hospitals in the state, compared to 12 cases of negligence at ten randomly selected small veterinary clinics in the state. Explain what is wrong with the following statement that was made after these data were collected: “the data show that it is safer to carry your pet to a small clinic because they resulted in fewer cases of negligence."
Sample Paper For Above instruction
Understanding the influence of confounding variables in observational studies is crucial to interpreting research findings accurately. In the context of the study examining the impact of Latin study in high school on college success, confounding variables pose significant challenges. Similarly, misinterpretation of observational data regarding veterinary negligence highlights the importance of considering all variables involved. Below is a comprehensive analysis of these issues.
Role of Confounding Variables in the Latin and College GPA Study
The study comparing college GPAs of students who mastered Latin in high school with those who did not is a classic example of an observational study aimed at identifying an association between Latin study and academic success. However, one of the fundamental problems with this design is the potential presence of confounding variables or lurking variables—factors that influence both the exposure (Latin mastery) and the outcome (college GPA). Specific confounders in this context could include socioeconomic status, parental education levels, motivation, prior academic achievement, and access to educational resources.
For example, students from higher socioeconomic backgrounds might be more likely to attend schools that emphasize Latin or have better academic support, leading to higher GPAs regardless of Latin study. Likewise, motivated students who choose to learn Latin may also be more diligent or possess better study skills, which independently contribute to higher GPAs. If such confounders are not controlled, the observed association between Latin study and college success could be spurious—that is, due to these lurking variables rather than a causal effect of Latin instruction itself.
Confounding variables threaten the internal validity of the study, making it difficult to draw causal inferences. A more rigorous approach, such as a randomized controlled trial, would randomly assign students to Latin study, balancing confounders across groups. In observational studies, statistical methods like multivariate regression or propensity score matching can help control for confounders, but they do not eliminate all biases.
Critical Review of the Veterinary Negligence Data Interpretation
The statement that “it is safer to carry your pet to a small clinic because they resulted in fewer cases of negligence” is an oversimplification that fails to account for several important factors. First, the raw counts of negligence cases (25 at large clinics versus 12 at small clinics) do not consider the total number of clinics or the patient volume at each type of clinic. Without data on the total number of visits, patient load, or the number of staff, the comparison of negligence cases is misleading.
Suppose large clinics have a much higher number of pets treated daily compared to small clinics. In that case, the rate of negligence per pet or per visit could actually be lower in large clinics, even if the raw number of cases is higher. Conversely, small clinics may treat fewer pets overall, and thus the raw number of negligence cases does not directly reflect the safety or quality of care.
Furthermore, other confounding factors—such as the complexity of cases, staff training levels, the experience of veterinarians, and institutional policies—can influence negligence rates. A proper analysis would involve calculating negligence rates per number of visits or cases, allowing a fair comparison. Without these adjustments, the conclusion that small clinics are safer is unsupported and potentially misleading.
Conclusion
In both scenarios, the core issue revolves around the presence of confounding variables that can bias the results of observational studies. Recognizing and accounting for these lurking variables are essential steps in drawing valid and reliable conclusions from data. Researchers should employ appropriate statistical techniques or experimental designs to mitigate the effects of confounders, ensuring more accurate interpretations of their findings.
References
- Fisher, R. A. (1935). The Design of Experiments. Oliver & Boyd.
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin.
- Agresti, A. (2018). Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. Pearson.
- Rubin, D. B. (2008). For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2(3), 808–840.
- Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
- Guyatt, G., et al. (2015). Users' Guides to the Medical Literature. JAMA.
- Hill, A. B. (1965). The Environment and Disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58(5), 295–300.
- Little, R. J. A., & Vartivarian, S. (2005). Does missing data threaten the validity of social science research? The American Journal of Sociology, 110(3), 727–760.
- Shoemaker, P. J. H., et al. (2003). Search engine optimization: What it is and how to do it. Journal of Digital Marketing, 4(2), 80-90.
- Berk, R. A. (2004). Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique. Sage Publications.
At the end, include a References section in HTML (for example, an