Employee Portfolio Motivation Action Plan MGT311 Version 21

Employee Portfolio Motivation Action Planmgt311 Version 21university

Determine the motivational strategy or strategies that would likely be most appropriate for each of your three employees on basis of their individual characteristics. Indicate how you would leverage their employee evaluations to motivate each of the three employees. Describe one or more of the motivational theories and explain how the theories connect to each of your selected motivational strategies.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective employee motivation is a cornerstone of organizational success, directly impacting productivity, job satisfaction, and retention rates. Developing tailored motivation strategies for individual employees requires a comprehensive understanding of their unique characteristics and how these can be aligned with established motivational theories. This paper examines three hypothetical employees with distinct traits, proposing specific motivational strategies for each and linking these strategies to relevant motivational theories, particularly Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, and Self-Determination Theory.

Employee Profiles and Motivational Strategies

Employee 1: Sarah – The Ambitious Young Professional

Sarah is a recent college graduate, eager to prove herself, highly ambitious, and driven by the desire for advancement and recognition. She values challenges, learning opportunities, and acknowledgment of her achievements. Her employee evaluations highlight her high performance, enthusiasm, and eagerness to take on new responsibilities.

Motivational Strategy: To motivate Sarah, the organization should implement a recognition and career development program that provides clear pathways for advancement, regular acknowledgment of her accomplishments, and opportunities for ongoing learning. Assigning her to challenging projects and providing mentorship can satisfy her needs for growth and esteem.

Employee 2: James – The Experienced Mid-Career Employee

James has been with the company for over a decade, demonstrating loyalty and a consistent work ethic. His evaluations reveal a stable but complacent attitude, with some dissatisfaction regarding the lack of new challenges and recognition. He values job security, a sense of belonging, and appreciation for his experience.

Motivational Strategy: For James, the focus should be on fulfilling his needs for belonging and recognition. Implementing team-based projects to enhance camaraderie, offering recognition programs emphasizing his expertise, and providing opportunities for mentoring younger employees can re-engage his motivation. Additionally, ensuring job stability and opportunities for nuanced responsibilities can address his need for security.

Employee 3: Lisa – The Creative New Hire

Lisa is a recent hire, characterized by high creativity and enthusiasm. Her evaluations suggest she thrives in autonomous environments, values meaningful work, and seeks intrinsic fulfillment. She reports feeling underutilized and desires more freedom to innovate.

Motivational Strategy: To encourage Lisa, management should foster an environment emphasizing autonomy, purpose, and opportunities for creative expression. Giving her projects with a high degree of independence, involving her in decision-making, and recognizing her innovative contributions aligns with her intrinsic motivators.

Leveraging Employee Evaluations

Employee evaluations serve as essential tools for understanding individual motivations and customizing strategies accordingly. Regular feedback sessions can identify evolving needs and preferences. For Sarah, evaluations can highlight her progress toward career goals, enabling tailored recognition and growth opportunities. For James, evaluations can serve to validate his contributions and identify opportunities for new challenges. In Lisa’s case, evaluations can emphasize her creative input and encourage her autonomy in project assignments. Utilizing evaluations in this way ensures that motivation strategies remain responsive and effective over time.

The Connection of Motivational Theories

Several motivational theories underpin these tailored strategies, notably Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, and Self-Determination Theory.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs suggests that employees are driven by a progression of needs, beginning with physiological necessities and advancing toward self-actualization. For Sarah, the focus on recognition and professional growth addresses esteem and self-actualization needs. James’s emphasis on job security and belonging corresponds to safety and social needs. Lisa’s desire for meaningful, autonomous work aligns with self-actualization, the pinnacle of Maslow’s pyramid.

Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory distinguishes between hygiene factors (which prevent dissatisfaction) and motivators (which foster satisfaction). Addressing hygiene factors for James, such as job security, reduces dissatisfaction. Motivators like recognition and achievement are central for Sarah. For Lisa, the opportunity to work autonomously and contribute meaningfully serves as a motivator.

Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan) emphasizes autonomy, competence, and relatedness as fundamental psychological needs. Strategies tailored to these needs—autonomy for Lisa, competence for Sarah through challenges, and relatedness for James via team participation—enhance intrinsic motivation, engagement, and satisfaction.

Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding individual characteristics allows for the development of personalized motivation strategies rooted in established motivational theories. Recognizing the unique drivers behind each employee’s performance and satisfaction enables effective engagement, promotes growth, and sustains organizational success. Regular utilization of employee evaluations ensures that motivation strategies are adaptive and targeted, fostering an environment where all employees can thrive.

References

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
  • Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The Motivation to Work. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Publications.
  • Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560-568.
  • Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. Wiley.
  • Herzberg, F. (1966). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 44(1), 53-62.
  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Pearson Education.

Related Assignments