EN3220: Module 5 Research And Peer Review Exercise 5.1 Ident

EN3220: Module 5 Research and Peer Review Exercise 5.1 Identifying the Best Solution

Read the three given applications and propose the best solution by applying creative thinking. For each application, state the problem, identify 2–3 solutions, and refine your best solution.

Paper For Above instruction

The task involves analyzing three real-life applications to develop creative solutions and then determine the most effective among them. This process requires critical thinking, evaluation of solutions based on certain criteria, supporting ideas with research, and presenting a comprehensive justification for the selected solution. These steps will be detailed below, providing a structured approach to solving complex problems in different contexts, including ethics in sports, parenting concerns over children's media consumption, and challenges faced by educators in fostering classroom discussions.

Analysis of Applications and Development of Solutions

The first application pertains to the ethical dilemma surrounding college athletics, where NCAA rules prohibit paying athletes, yet financial incentives are allegedly being offered covertly. The problem here involves maintaining fairness and integrity in collegiate sports. Solutions to this issue could include implementing stricter monitoring of recruiting activities, increasing transparency through reporting mechanisms, and developing new policies that allow fair compensation in a regulated manner. The most promising solution might involve establishing a transparent payment system that aligns with NCAA regulations, fostering fairness without compromising amateur status. This solution addresses the core problem by balancing ethical considerations with practicality and compliance, increasing the sport’s integrity and the institution’s reputation.

The second application involves parental concerns regarding children's exposure to television content. The problem is that much of the available programming promotes harmful attitudes or is simply a waste of time. Practical solutions include limiting screen time, curating age-appropriate educational content, and encouraging alternative recreational activities such as outdoor play or reading. Among these, curating suitable content and setting limits seems most effective, as it directly addresses the concern while promoting healthier habits. This solution can be implemented with relatively low cost and has the potential to significantly influence children's attitudes by replacing potentially harmful programming with constructive alternatives.

The third application deals with the challenge faced by Professor Murphy, who struggles to foster active class discussions among literature students. The problem revolves around student engagement. Possible solutions include incorporating more interactive teaching methods, such as group projects, multimedia presentations, or peer-led discussions. Improving the relevance of lesson material and providing incentives for participation might also help. The most effective refinement is an interactive approach that makes the material more engaging and accessible. This method enhances student involvement by making discussions more participatory, thereby increasing learning outcomes and student satisfaction, with feasible implementation in most academic settings.

Judging the Solutions Using Criteria

To evaluate these solutions, two criteria are selected: practicality and fairness. For each application, I will assess whether the solutions are practical to implement and whether they promote fairness or ethical standards. For college athletics, implementing a transparent payment system is practical because it aligns with existing regulatory frameworks and enhances fairness by ensuring athletes are adequately compensated within legal boundaries. In the context of children's media consumption, curating content and setting limits are both highly practical and promote fairness by providing equal opportunities for all children to access quality programming. For the literature class, adopting interactive teaching methods is practical, requiring minimal financial investment, but significantly improves fairness by offering all students an equitable chance to participate and learn actively.

After analyzing these criteria, the best overall solution appears to be the implementation of a transparent payment system for college athletes. This solution not only addresses the ethical concerns rooted in fairness but also conforms to existing regulations, making it feasible in the current collegiate sports environment. Transparency can be achieved through regular audits and reporting, preventing under-the-table payments, and fostering a culture of integrity. Such a solution results in a fairer, more ethical system that benefits the students, institutions, and the sport’s reputation. Hence, this solution stands out as the most balanced in terms of practicality, fairness, and potential for positive impact.

Supporting Research and Evidence

Research indicates that transparent systems for athlete compensation can reduce corruption and unethical behaviors, improving the integrity of sports organizations (Cole & LaPorte, 2022). Financial fairness is associated with increased athlete satisfaction and institutional trust (Jenkins & White, 2021). In terms of children's media consumption, studies show that curated content and parental controls positively influence children's attitudes and behavioral development (Brown & Lee, 2020). Interactive teaching strategies have been proven to increase engagement and academic performance, especially when integrated with digital tools (Nguyen & Zhang, 2019). Implementing such approaches increases student involvement and satisfaction in learning environments.

Conclusion

Addressing complex problems requires creative, well-researched solutions, and evaluating these solutions against criteria such as practicality and fairness ensures selection of the most effective remedy. For the college athletic dilemma, establishing a transparent compensation system emerges as the best solution due to its ethical benefits and practical feasibility. Such an approach fosters integrity, fairness, and trust, setting a precedent for reform in collegiate athletics. Similar principles apply to other contexts, emphasizing the importance of balanced, research-supported decision-making in solving societal issues.

References

  • Cole, J., & LaPorte, T. (2022). Transparency in collegiate sports: Addressing corruption and maintaining integrity. Journal of Sports Management, 36(2), 123-137.
  • Jenkins, R., & White, A. (2021). Financial fairness and athlete satisfaction: The role of transparent compensation systems. International Journal of Sports Economics, 22(4), 251-265.
  • Brown, S., & Lee, M. (2020). Parental influence on children's media consumption: Effects of curated content. Journal of Child Development Research, 2020, 1-10.
  • Nguyen, T., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Enhancing student engagement through digital tools: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 451–471.
  • Smith, L., & Jones, H. (2018). Ethical considerations in college sports. Ethics in Sports Journal, 12(1), 43-59.
  • Williams, P., & Anderson, D. (2017). Strategies for fostering active classroom discussions. Teaching & Teacher Education, 67, 123-132.
  • Martin, A., & Perez, S. (2019). Parental regulation of children's screen time: Policies and practices. Journal of Family Studies, 25(4), 512-530.
  • Lopez, M., & Kim, Y. (2021). Interactive learning in higher education: Methods and outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 327–340.
  • Gordon, R., & Mitchell, K. (2020). Addressing corruption in college athletics: Policies and solutions. Sports Policy & Politics, 22(5), 567-580.
  • Davies, R., & Sharma, P. (2023). Creating ethical frameworks for student-athlete payments. Journal of Sports Ethics, 15(1), 78-92.

Related Assignments