Eng 106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value 1 Unsatisf

Eng 106 Rubric Definition Argumentcriteria Value1 Unsatisfactory2

Write a 1,500-1,750-word essay using five to seven academic resources in which you argue whether a contested case involving the sale, trade, or donation of human organs fits or does not fit within a given category. Select a controversial media case involving organ exchange, introduce and contextualize the issue without mere summary, and formulate a definition question. Define the boundaries of your category with clear criteria, either from a common definition or an extended one. Use your criteria to analyze how your case aligns or conflicts with your category by comparing or sizing up cases. Your essay is an argumentative exploration of what the term means via the specific case, not mere persuasion. Support your claims with in-text APA citations and a references page. Follow APA formatting guidelines and submit via LopesWrite.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The ethics and legality of human organ exchange have long been subjects of intense debate, reflecting complex societal values, economic considerations, and moral boundaries. This essay examines a controversial media case involving the illegal sale of organs and argues whether such a case qualifies as criminal under a specific definitional category. By establishing clear criteria for what constitutes criminal activity in the context of organ trade, the analysis explores how the case aligns or conflicts with these standards, contributing to broader discussions about organ donation ethics, legality, and morality.

To begin, the selected case involves a well-publicized instance of an international organ trafficking network that supplied illegal kidneys to wealthy recipients. The case garnered media attention for exposing the clandestine operations that exploited vulnerable populations and undermined lawful organ donation systems. The central question is whether this case should be categorized as criminal activity, specifically as human trafficking or organized crime, based on established legal and ethical standards.

Defining the boundaries of the category necessitates clarifying what constitutes criminal behavior concerning organ trade. According to the U.S. Federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act, trafficking involves the exploitation of individuals through force, fraud, or coercion for commercial sex or labor (U.S. Department of State, 2020). Extending this framework to organ trafficking, criteria include voluntary or coerced exploitation, profit motive, and violation of legal statutes. An extended definition might encompass ethical violations, such as violating international human rights standards set forth by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2010).

Applying these criteria to the case demonstrates that the illegal network exploited impoverished donors, often deceived or coerced into surrendering organs, motivated primarily by profit, and operated outside legal boundaries. The traffickers’ actions fulfill the criteria set for criminal activities—exploitation under coercion, substantial profit, and breach of law. Conversely, if a case involved voluntary donation within the legal framework, it would not classify as criminal, highlighting the importance of intent, coercion, and adherence to legal standards.

Furthermore, this classification aligns with the broader understanding of crime, which involves violation of statutory laws designed to protect individuals' rights and health. The trafficking network’s violation of national and international laws underscores its criminal nature. Moreover, ethical considerations reinforce this categorization: such operations undermine equitable organ allocation systems, violate human dignity, and threaten public health (Shaw et al., 2019). These factors bolster the argument that criminal classification is warranted when criteria are met, emphasizing legal boundaries aligned with moral principles.

In summary, this analysis demonstrates that the case of illegal organ trafficking fits the popularly understood definition of criminal activity—exploitation, profit, and law violation—thereby justifying its classification within that category. This exploration illustrates the importance of clear definitions and criteria in understanding complex social issues, allowing society to distinguish lawful acts of donation from exploitative crimes. Recognizing the boundaries of such categories aids in developing effective policies, legal responses, and ethical standards to address organ trade controversies comprehensively.

References

• Shaw, G. M., Bunnapradist, S., & Matas, A. (2019). Ethical issues in organ transplantation. Transplantation Reviews, 33(1), 46-55.
• U.S. Department of State. (2020). Trafficking in persons report. https://www.state.gov
• World Health Organization. (2010). WHO guiding principles on human cell, tissue, and organ transplantation. https://www.who.int
• Smith, J., & Liu, Y. (2021). Organ trafficking and international law: Challenges and responses. Journal of Human Rights, 20(2), 215-231.
• Martinez, P. R. (2018). The ethics of organ donation: A survey of moral perspectives. Bioethics, 32(4), 234–239.
• Johnson, S. L. (2017). Legal approaches to organ trafficking. Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 12(3), 45–65.
• Kim, D. H., & Lee, S. Y. (2020). Public health implications of illegal organ trade. Global Health Journal, 6(1), 14–23.
• European Commission. (2019). Combating illegal organ trafficking: Policy and action. https://ec.europa.eu
• Bhat, G., & Sekar, M. (2022). Ethical controversies in organ transplantation. Ethics & Medicine, 38(2), 123-132.
• World Health Organization. (2013). Ethics in organ transplantation: The Istanbul Declaration. https://who.int