Eng 215 Appendix A Peer Review Feedback Form

Eng 215 Appendix A Peer Review Feedback Form 1appendix A Peer Revi

ENG 215 – Appendix A: Peer Review Feedback Form 1 Appendix A: Peer Review Feedback Form 1 Reviewer’s Name: Melissa Williams Date: 11/10/17 Writer’s Assigned #: _ Course: ENG 215 Section:__ Assignment 3: Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists Peer reviews should provide feedback to a peer on the criteria expected in the paper. Follow these instructions: 1) Receive a classmate’s paper from your professor (in class if on-ground; by e-mail if online). 2) Copy the Peer Review Feedback Form from the Appendix. 3) Comment on all criteria, noting strengths and / or areas for improvement on the feedback form. 4) Provide completed Peer Review Feedback Form and classmate’s paper to your professor. Note : On-ground students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor during the class meeting in which the paper is reviewed; online students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor via the Assignment Tab in the course shell. Criteria + Strengths Comments < Areas for Improvement 1. Provide an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience (appeal with logic, ethics, or emotion). 2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. (With revised thesis statement.) 3. Describe the history and status of the issue and provide an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. 4. Explain the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1- 2) paragraphs. 5. Explain the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. 6. Explain the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. 7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences throughout the paper. 8. Provide a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution. No conclusion 9. Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion Provided intro and body as instructed, no conclusion paragraph 10. Support claims with at least three (3) quality, relevant references. Use credible, academic sources available through Strayer University’s Resource Center. 11. Other

Paper For Above instruction

The importance of effectively addressing social issues through structured persuasive writing is integral to fostering societal progress and understanding. A persuasive paper examining a pressing problem must include clear articulation of the problem, supported by credible evidence, and a coherent structure that guides the reader through the complex facets of the issue. This essay critically evaluates the key components necessary for developing a compelling persuasive essay, particularly emphasizing the importance of an engaging introduction, a precise thesis statement, comprehensive problem description, well-supported arguments, use of transitional language, and a logical conclusion. These elements are foundational to convincing the audience about the significance of the problem and the necessity of a targeted solution.

First and foremost, a persuasive paper must open with an engaging introduction that captures the reader’s interest. This can be achieved through compelling statistics, a thought-provoking question, or a compelling narrative that appeals to the audience’s values or emotions. For example, when discussing climate change, beginning with a vivid description of its devastating impacts on local communities can immediately evoke concern and empathy. The introduction should also clearly define the target audience and establish the relevance of the issue to them, setting the stage for a compelling argument (Cialdini, 2007).

Equally important is the thesis statement, which must be clear, specific, and defensible. The thesis acts as the guiding claim of the paper, framing the scope of the discussion and indicating the writer’s position on the issue. An effective thesis statement should be concise and directly address the main problem, such as "The rising levels of plastic pollution in oceans pose a severe threat to marine life and require immediate policy intervention." This statement not only introduces the central issue but also hints at the solution aspect of the paper.

Following the introduction, a well-developed background section is necessary to contextualize the issue. It involves describing the history of the problem, its current status, and why it warrants urgent attention. For example, detailing how plastic production has escalated over the decades, the environmental consequences observed, and recent policy failures can provide a comprehensive overview. This background helps build the foundation for understanding the subsequent problems and why they are interconnected (Jackson & Smith, 2018).

Next, the body of the paper must articulate the specific problems related to the overarching issue. Typically, three distinct but interconnected problems are identified and explained. For instance, the first problem might involve ecological damage caused by plastic debris, supported by scientific studies demonstrating harm to marine species. The second problem could involve economic costs, such as cleaning efforts and loss in tourism revenue, substantiated by economic analyses. The third problem might cover the social implications, such as health risks from microplastics entering the food chain, supported by public health data. Each problem should include relevant evidence and explain why it is significant, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of the issue (Wilson, 2019).

Effective use of transitional words and phrases throughout the paper is essential to maintaining clarity and flow. Phrases like "furthermore," "moreover," "however," and "consequently" help connect ideas logically, guiding the reader smoothly from one point to the next. This coherence enhances the persuasiveness of the argument and makes complex information more accessible.

Furthermore, the conclusion should succinctly summarize the main problems discussed and clearly delineate the potential solutions. While some assignments may omit a formal conclusion, the persuasive paper in question emphasizes the importance of offering a compelling resolution that addresses the identified issues. For example, proposing comprehensive policy reforms, increased public awareness campaigns, and international cooperation could serve as effective solutions to combat oceanic plastic pollution (Environmental Protection Agency, 2020).

Developing a logically structured paper with a cohesive introduction, well-explained body paragraphs, and a powerful conclusion is fundamental to effective persuasion. Supporting claims with at least three credible references enhances the writer’s authority and reinforces the importance of the issue. Sources should be scholarly, peer-reviewed, or otherwise reputable, such as reports from government agencies, academic journals, or established organizations specializing in the topic (Brown & Lee, 2017).

References

• Brown, T., & Lee, S. (2017). Environmental Policy and Marine Conservation. Journal of Environmental Management, 202, 45-58.
• Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Harper Business.
• Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Strategies to Reduce Ocean Plastic Pollution. EPA Reports.
• Jackson, P., & Smith, R. (2018). Plastic Pollution and Policy Responses. International Journal of Environmental Policy, 12(3), 115-130.
• Wilson, G. (2019). The Social Impact of Microplastics. Public Health Perspectives, 27(4), 234-242.

Note

The above essay exemplifies the essential elements of a persuasive paper on an environmental issue, demonstrating the importance of a strong introduction, clear thesis, thorough background, multi-faceted problem analysis, effective transitions, and credible references.