Engl 317 Summer 2021 Session 1 Project 1 Schedule

Engl 317 Summer 2021 Session Ipage 1 Of 2project 1 Schedule Week 1

Develop a comprehensive plan for completing Project 1 in ENGL 317, which involves analyzing your own writing, creating a memo report, and producing a podcast. The project spans approximately 12 hours and includes several steps: familiarizing yourself with the project materials, analyzing prior non-fiction writing, understanding technical prose and presentation speaking styles, drafting a self-evaluation, and preparing both written and audio deliverables. Specific tasks include reviewing lecture materials, examining your own writing for style and errors, planning and practicing your podcast, and submitting all components by the deadline of May 23.

Paper For Above instruction

In today's digital and multimedia-driven academic landscape, developing effective communication skills across multiple modalities is essential. ENGL 317's Project 1 emphasizes both written analysis and oral presentation skills, requiring students to critically evaluate their existing non-fiction writing, craft a detailed memo report, and produce an audio-only podcast. This multifaceted assignment aims to deepen students' understanding of technical prose, presentation style, and self-evaluation, equipping them with versatile communication tools applicable to academic and professional contexts.

The project begins with foundational preparation: students are advised to review relevant handouts and lecture slides that address formatting, readability, style versus grammar distinctions, and effective memo writing. Familiarity with these materials ensures a coherent approach to analyzing personal writing. Selecting a substantial piece of prior non-fiction work—preferably over 750 words—is crucial, as it provides substantive content for style analysis. Creative writing is excluded from this task to maintain focus on functional, technical prose suited for professional communication.

Following the initial review, students undertake a meticulous analysis of their chosen writing. The handout "How to Analyze Your Writing for Style and Noticeable Error" offers a systematic approach—identifying strengths and areas for improvement in style, clarity, and grammatical accuracy. Drafting the memo report simultaneously during analysis is encouraged, as it streamlines the process and ensures that insights are documented effectively. This analysis phase is essential, as it informs subsequent reflections and the development of the podcast script.

The third step involves studying instructional materials on podcast composition, focusing on options and technical considerations. Students are directed to review the project module page and perform a test recording to troubleshoot any issues. Deciding on a topic involves narrowing a broad subject, drafting a script, and practicing delivery. Emphasis is placed on authenticity over perfection, encouraging students to record in a manner that is natural and engaging. The podcast serves as a practical application of presentation skills, enabling the articulation of ideas learned through prior analysis.

The final phase culminates in the submission of three components: a self-evaluation, the memo report, and the podcast URL. The self-evaluation, drafted in Word or PDF format, reflects on personal growth and challenges encountered during the project. The memo report synthesizes the analysis findings, writing style observations, and recommendations for improvement. The podcast, an audio recording, is submitted via URL link, allowing the instructor to assess oral delivery and technical execution.

Overall, this project exemplifies an integrated approach to developing technical writing, analytical reasoning, and presentation skills. Through reflective analysis and multimedia communication, students are encouraged to become more proficient and confident communicators, capable of adapting their style for diverse professional contexts. Meeting the deadline of May 23 ensures timely completion and evaluation of these competencies, preparing students for future academic and career endeavors where effective communication is paramount.

References

• Bartholomae, D. (1986). Inventing the University. Journal of Advanced Composition, 6(1), 3-23.
• Bizup, J. (2008). The Good Life of Technical Writing. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 624–637.
• Connors, R. J., & Lunsford, A. A. (1993). The Origins of Academic Writing. College Composition and Communication, 44(1), 56–62.
• Haas, C., & Lunsford, A. (2004). Easy Writer: A Pocket Guide. Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Horner, B., & Trimbur, J. (2002). Community Writing and Critical Literacy. College Composition and Communication, 54(2), 278–319.
• Lunsford, A. A., & Ruszkiewicz, J. J. (2010). Everything's an Argument. Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as Community in the Study of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 35(2), 157–171.
• Schryer, C. F. (2007). The Writing Lives of Nurses: Critical Perspectives. Praxis: A Writing Center Journal, 5(2).
• Starke, A. (2013). Technical Communication: Process and Product. Cengage Learning.
• Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. University of Michigan Press.