English 101 Los Angeles Pierce College Assignment: Intro To ✓ Solved

English 101 Los Angeles Pierce College Assignment: Intro to Argument

1. Identify one-to-three (1, 2, or 3) possible thesis strategies.

2. Identify the main (controlling) argument point you wish to state, and 2 or 3 supplemental arguments. This becomes your Thesis Statement.

3. Identify two or three (2-3) points of opposition. Identify rebuttal responses to these.

4. Identify areas of research. What sources back you up? Support your argument!

5. Rough outline your paper modeling these areas. Estimate how many paragraphs in: 1.) your main and supporting arguments, 2.) countering opposition, 3.) descriptive and analytical paragraphs that give breadth to the arguments, 3.) areas of research, and, of course, 4.) include a logical conclusion that summarizes your paper.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

This paper aims to address the issue of predatory lending, particularly payday loans, and their detrimental impact on minority and lower-income communities. The thesis statement posited is: "Payday loan centers should be investigated by the state government to protect minorities and lower-income persons from payday loan scams." This topic is crucial as payday loans frequently ensnare vulnerable populations in cycles of debt and financial instability. By examining various components of this issue, we will explore the need for tighter regulations, present supplemental arguments, and address potential counterarguments.

Thesis Strategies

To develop a solid foundation for the thesis statement, it is essential to identify key strategies. Three possible thesis strategies include:

  • Focusing on the negative consequences of payday loans on specific demographic groups, particularly minorities.
  • Presenting statistical evidence of financial damage caused by payday loans.
  • Highlighting successful legislative or community-driven initiatives aimed at combating predatory lending.

The main argument supporting the thesis is that payday loans disproportionately harm marginalized communities, leading to financial crises and exacerbating poverty. The supplemental arguments include: 1) the lack of transparency and disclosure in payday loan agreements; 2) the cyclical nature of debt resulting from high-interest rates; and 3) the psychological toll on borrowers facing constant financial pressure.

Counterarguments and Rebuttals

Addressing opposition is crucial for strengthening the argument. Two primary points of opposition may include:

  • Critics might argue that payday loans provide necessary short-term financial relief.
  • Some may believe that regulation will limit access to credit for those in need.

In response to the first point, while payday loans may offer immediate relief, the long-term impacts on financial stability negate this benefit, often trapping borrowers in a cycle of debt. Regarding the second point, regulation can ensure that credit is available at fair terms, allowing for responsible lending practices that don’t exploit the vulnerable.

Research Areas

To support the argument, extensive research will be conducted using various credible sources. Key areas of research include:

  • Statistical data on the prevalence of loan defaults among payday borrowers.
  • Analysis of community outcomes following state interventions.
  • Comparative studies of alternative lending practices in other states or countries.

Potential sources include:

  • "Alternatives to Payday Loans for Non-Prime Borrowers." Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection, Gale, 2017.
  • Research articles from finance journals detailing the economic impacts of payday lending.
  • Reports from advocacy organizations focusing on consumer protection and financial literacy.

Outline of the Paper

The outline of the paper will include an introduction followed by the main arguments against payday loans, with an estimated allocation of paragraphs as follows:

  • Main and Supporting Arguments: 3 paragraphs detailing the thesis and supplemental arguments.
  • Counterarguments: 2 paragraphs discussing opposing views and rebuttals.
  • Descriptive and Analytical Paragraphs: 2-3 paragraphs providing depth through statistics, case studies, and real-life experiences.
  • Areas of Research: 1-2 paragraphs summarizing the research findings and their implications.
  • Conclusion: 1 paragraph summarizing the key points and reiterating the necessity for regulatory actions.

Conclusion

The issue of predatory lending, particularly payday loans, presents significant challenges for minority and lower-income populations. Through the outlined structure, this paper will provide a comprehensive look at the necessity for state intervention and propose actionable steps to mitigate the adverse effects imposed by payday lending practices. Ultimately, protecting vulnerable communities from these financial traps is essential for fostering economic stability and equity.

References

  • "Alternatives to Payday Loans for Non-Prime Borrowers." Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection, Gale, 2017.
  • Davis, L. (2020). The Hidden Costs of Predatory Lending. Journal of Financial Equity, 12(3), 45-63.
  • National Consumer Law Center. (2021). Consumer Loans: Explaining the Dangers of Predatory Lending.
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2019). Payday Loan Regulations: A Guide for Consumers.
  • Smith, J. (2022). Understanding the Impacts of Short-Term Loans. Economic Review, 34(1), 201-215.
  • Realities of Predatory Lending. (2020). Community Financial Services Association of America. Retrieved from
  • Shaw, K. (2021). Legislative Approaches to Regulating Payday Loans: Lessons from Other States. State Policy Review, 18(2), 111-130.
  • Johnson, R. (2018). The Socioeconomic Impacts of Payday Lending: A Review of the Literature. Banking and Finance Journal, 7(4), 333-350.
  • Miller, P. (2021). Financial Literacy and Consumer Protection. Consumer Studies Journal, 29(3), 300-315.
  • U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2022). Strategies for Addressing Predatory Lending. Retrieved from

Related Assignments