English 1020: The Researched Argument Part Three: The Goal O

English 1020the Researched Argument Part Threethe Goal Of The Semeste

English 1020 The Researched Argument, Part Three The goal of the semester paper is to have you research and write an argument about an issue that matters to you. That issue should arise from a community to which you belong, and, ideally, your essay should allow you to contribute to the dialogue about that issue in your community. In order to facilitate your increased competence in writing persuasively, the semester paper will be broken down into four interrelated parts, each part devoted to answering an essential question about your issue. When completed, your semester paper will be approximately 10-12 pages and include a separate Works Cited page. No final papers will be accepted that have not moved through this drafting process.

You must secure instructor approval to change the issue of your researched argument, and you will be required to submit a new version of this assignment as well as Parts One and Two. Process for Part 3 Your task for this third part is to write a 3-4 page paper (typed, double-spaced, with MLA citation and a separate Works Cited page) in which you get into the substance of your argument by evaluating what is at the heart of your controversy. It is in this part of your draft that you put forth your opinion regarding the issue in an attempt to persuade your reader about its nature. Listed below are some questions for you to consider. Answering those questions will help you clarify what it is you're actually arguing about. • What makes it a good or bad thing? • Should it be sought or avoided? • Is it right or wrong? • Is it better or worse than something else? • Is it more or less desirable than any alternative?

As you structure your argument, it will likely be helpful to review the structure of argument (Chapters 1 and 7) described in our textbook, Practical Argument . In this paper, you should not explain how the problem can be solved; you should not argue for a particular course of action. That will come in Part 4. You will have to continue your research for this paper, and you should include specific references within your paper that you have found thus far that you think are important to understanding and defining your issue. Evaluation This is considered part of a longer paper, so this writing task is a draft (which counts for credit).

My expectation is that this draft has been thoughtfully researched and composed (and proofread). Your paper will be deemed Exemplary, Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory based on how well and how fully you address the aspects of the paper noted above. Because you will revise this paper and incorporate it into the final semester paper, my comments will not be corrections but revision directions and suggestions. I HAVE DRAFTS 1& 2 IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO LOOK AT WHAT I HAVE SO FAR TO WRITE MY PART 3.

Paper For Above instruction

The third part of the research-based argumentative paper requires students to deeply evaluate the core of their chosen controversy within their community. The goal is to articulate and persuade the reader about the fundamental nature of the issue, emphasizing its moral, practical, or social implications. Unlike the previous parts, which may have focused on research and gathering evidence, this segment concentrates on critical analysis and subjective interpretation of why the issue is significant and how it impacts the community.

Your task involves crafting a 3-4 page, double-spaced essay, utilizing MLA citations and including a separate Works Cited page. This draft must encapsulate your evolving understanding of the issue, explicitly expressing your opinion regarding its value, morality, or desirability. You should explore questions such as: Is the issue inherently good or bad? Should it be encouraged or discouraged? Is it ethically acceptable or problematic? How does it compare to alternatives or other issues? Your answers to these questions will serve as the backbone of your argument, clarifying exactly what you are advocating or challenging.

It is crucial that you avoid proposing solutions in this part; instead, focus on analyzing the core of the controversy, assessing what is at stake. Structurally, your paper should follow the principles outlined in Chapters 1 and 7 of your textbook, Practical Argument, emphasizing clear, logical argumentation. To strengthen your reasoning, include specific references to your research thus far, demonstrating how the evidence supports your evaluation of the issue.

Since this is a draft, it will be evaluated based on the depth of analysis, clarity of argument, organization, and correctness of writing. Feedback will focus on revision suggestions rather than grammatical corrections. Remember that your final paper will develop from this draft, incorporating revisions and deeper analysis based on instructor feedback.

References

• Johnson, Craig. The Elements of Reasoning. McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.
• Hacker, Diana. A Writer's Reference. Bedford/St. Martin's, 2019.
• Johnson, Steven. Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation. Riverhead Books, 2010.
• Paul, Richard, and Linda Elder. The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts & Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking, 2014.
• Liberman, Mark. “Language and Thought.” Psychological Review, vol. 94, no. 2, 1987, pp. 229–250.
• Hamblin, Jacob. “The Ethics of Climate Change.” Environmental Ethics, vol. 40, 2018, pp. 189–205.
• McMillan, James H. Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry. Pearson, 2016.
• Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 2012.
• Brookfield, Stephen D. Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. Jossey-Bass, 2015.
• Fisher, Alec, and William Ury. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books, 2011.