English Or LLd 100a Fall 2018 Discipline Investigation Purpo

Engl Or Lld 100a Fall 20181discipline Investigationpurpose And Audienc

Identify and investigate a discourse community related to your field of study, focusing on the texts (genres) they use. Conduct an interview with a seasoned professional in that community, and supplement your findings with outside research on the communication practices and expectations within that community. Write a report that introduces your chosen community, details your interview and research findings, and reflects on how this has influenced your understanding of your future career. Your report should include an introduction, background on your interviewee’s career path, an overview of their current role, a description of communication skills needed in the community, and a conclusion discussing your insights and future preparations.

Paper For Above instruction

The discipline investigation project is a vital exercise in understanding the communicative norms and texts used within a specific discourse community associated with one's academic or professional interests. Selecting an appropriate community—such as a profession or specialized group—provides insight into the language, genres, and interactions that are commonplace in that field. The primary goal is to bridge theoretical knowledge with practical understanding by engaging directly with a community member through an interview and supplementing this with scholarly research.

The first step involves identifying and interviewing a professional at a senior level within the chosen community, ideally with at least five years of experience, to gain deep insights into the community’s communication practices, career pathways, and skill requirements. Preparing thoughtful questions about their background, current responsibilities, and communication skills ensures a comprehensive discussion. Confidentiality must be maintained during the interview, emphasizing the professional’s trust and privacy.

Alongside the interview, conducting outside research using credible sources such as academic articles or industry journals enhances understanding of the community’s standards and expectations. For example, researching the typical roles, career development pathways, and genre conventions in the field provides context for the interview insights.

The final report should open with an introduction that presents the community of focus and reflects on initial expectations before the study. Following this, the report routes through the interview findings: describing the interviewee’s background, career trajectory, current role, and responsibilities, with references to outside sources for support. An exploration of the communication skills relevant to the community—such as reading, writing, and interprofessional interaction—follows. Finally, a reflective conclusion links these findings to personal academic and career planning, noting areas requiring further development.

Organization and clarity are essential. The report should feature distinct sections with headings in capitals and bold, containing 1300-1500 words, formatted in Times New Roman, size 12, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins. Including an appendix of interview questions and a works cited page is necessary. Proper citation of sources supports credibility, and adhering to deadlines for drafts, peer reviews, and final submission ensures a structured academic process.

This assignment bridges understanding of discourse communities and enhances communication awareness critical for professional success. By engaging directly with industry experts and substantiating findings with scholarly research, students develop comprehensive perspectives on how genres and discourse patterns shape professional interactions.

References

• Bhatia, V. K. (2004). At the interface: Learning, teaching and research in professional communication. IBPC.
• Hyland, K. (2011). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. University of Michigan Press.
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
• Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151-167.
• Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, context, and the teaching of academic writing. Journal of Basic Writing, 16(1), 94-106.
• Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (2009). Style and social context: The pragmatic functions of hedging in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 343-371.
• Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). The place of global englishes in composition: Plenary address. College Composition and Communication, 53(4), 586-606.
• Flowerdew, J. (2004). The discourse community myth revisited. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 365-385.
• Hood, W. C., & Sinha, S. (2019). Genre analysis for professional communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 62(4), 328-342.
• Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in writing. Heinle & Heinle Publishing.