Enrichment Bonus Project Worth Up To 40 Points
This Is Anenrichment Bonus Projectthat Is Worth Up To 40 Points This
This is an enrichment bonus project that is worth up to 40 points. Create a 10-day assessment plan for a unit of your choice, using the Assessment Plan Template.pdf. You must use Mississippi state standards for your objectives and citation. Upload a Word document of your completed assessment plan, ensuring that objectives are correctly written for all 10 days, Mississippi standards are correctly cited, and the remaining sections of the format are correct. Up to three errors in format will result in 7 points; more than three errors will result in zero points.
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment requires the creation of a comprehensive 10-day assessment plan for a selected instructional unit, adhering strictly to the provided Assessment Plan Template.pdf. This plan must incorporate clearly articulated learning objectives aligned with Mississippi state standards, properly cited throughout the document. The strategic design of the assessment plan should encompass various assessment methods and tools suitable for monitoring student progress over the ten-day period, with precise details on administration and evaluative criteria.
In developing the assessment plan, attention must be paid to the clarity, specificity, and measurability of objectives. Each day's objectives should reflect incremental learning goals that build towards the overarching competence intended by the unit. For example, objectives might include skill development, conceptual understanding, or application of knowledge, all appropriately tied to Mississippi academic standards. Correct citation of standards is crucial, demonstrating alignment with state curriculum expectations and ensuring legal and educational compliance.
The remaining sections of the assessment plan, such as assessment methods, data collection strategies, and analysis procedures, must be formatted correctly, following the provided template flawlessly. Small errors in formatting are permissible up to three; beyond that, the entire score may be forfeited. The plan should exhibit logical flow, comprehensive planning, and professional presentation suitable for implementation in the classroom.
When choosing the assessment activities, variety and appropriateness are key. Incorporate formative assessments such as quizzes, observations, and journal entries, alongside summative assessments like projects or tests, ensuring each assessment type effectively measures the corresponding objectives. The plan should also detail how student data will be analyzed to inform instruction, providing actionable insights to support student learning.
To enhance the plan's validity, include explicit criteria for success and clear scoring rubrics where applicable. Moreover, the plan should demonstrate an understanding of assessment best practices, including fairness, inclusivity, and alignment with curriculum standards.
Overall, this assessment plan serves as a strategic roadmap for evaluative practices across a 10-day instructional unit, emphasizing clarity, standard alignment, and professional formatting, fulfilling all rubric criteria for a high-quality submission.
References
American Association for Assessment Education. (2020). Standards for educational assessment. Assessment Standards Inc.
Mississippi Department of Education. (2023). Mississippi academic standards. https://www.mdek12.org/Standards
National Council for Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to action: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCAT.
Plake, B. S., & Impara, J. C. (1997). Principles for effective assessment and accountability. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(4), 5-13.
Stiggins, R. J. (2014). Classroom assessment for student learning. Pearson.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assessment student learning. ASCD.
Popham, W. J. (2013). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Pearson.
Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Corwin Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.