Enterprise Risk Management Chapter 18 ERM Blue Wood

Its 835 Enterprise Risk Managementchapter 18erm Blue Wood Chocolate

Analyze the case of Blue Wood Chocolates, a U.S. manufacturer of chocolate products, with a focus on their enterprise risk management (ERM) practices. The company is privately owned, experiencing financial instability under new management, and facing internal and external challenges such as market competition and internal conflicts. The objective is to assess their current risk management gaps, especially given concerns from banks about financial performance and risk exposures, including currency hedges and futures.

The analysis should include an overview of the company's background, market environment, financial performance, and key risks. It should explore how the company's risk management practices can be improved to address the identified issues. The paper must conclude with recommendations for implementing ERM in alignment with corporate objectives and top management support.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Blue Wood Chocolates, a prominent player in the U.S. chocolate manufacturing industry, is grappling with significant financial and operational challenges. Despite operating within a growing market characterized by intense competition from large firms with established brand recognition, Blue Wood's financial health is deteriorating. These challenges highlight the crucial importance of a robust Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework to navigate risks effectively and stabilize the company's financial performance.

Background

Founded as a privately owned, family-operated business, Blue Wood has recently undergone a leadership change with the appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer (CFO) brought in from outside the organization. The new CFO's primary role was to stabilize declining financial performance, which has become precarious with indicators such as reduced profitability, dwindling cash reserves, and mounting internal conflicts. Banks have expressed concern over the company’s financial stability, especially given its reliance on borrowed funds, such as a revolving line of credit, and its exposure to currency risks through hedging and futures positions.

The internal environment is characterized by finger-pointing among departments, deteriorated retained earnings, and substantial investments that may not yield expected returns. External market dynamics include surging demand within the market, but also increasing competitive pressures from large, well-established players with strong branding. Additionally, the company faces volatility in commodity markets like cocoa and sugar, further complicating financial planning.

Market Overview

The chocolate industry, particularly in the U.S., is experiencing growth driven by increasing consumer demand for premium and craft chocolates. Major competitive factors include brand recognition, product quality, and pricing strategies. Large producers maintain dominance through extensive distribution channels and marketing campaigns, making it difficult for smaller firms like Blue Wood to expand market share.

The cocoa market is marked by price volatility driven by supply chain disruptions and political instability in producing regions, affecting raw material costs. Sugar and milk markets also pose risks due to fluctuating prices and supply constraints. These external factors significantly impact production costs and profit margins, emphasizing the need for effective risk management to mitigate adverse impacts.

Financial Performance

Blue Wood’s financial metrics are concerning. Profitability measures lag behind competitors, with deteriorated cash flow, falling retained earnings, and increased borrowing. The company's cash position is strained, leading to reliance on external financing. Its investment in currency hedges and futures, intended to hedge against foreign exchange risks, is risky and not yielding the expected stabilization of cash flows. Moreover, potential legal liabilities, such as a $10 million lawsuit, pose additional risks that could further impair financial stability.

These financial vulnerabilities underscore the necessity for a comprehensive ERM approach focusing on identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks proactively.

Need for ERM and Strategic Implementation

Implementing ERM in Blue Wood is critical to addressing these challenges. A structured approach requires top management commitment, clear communication of corporate objectives, and alignment of risk management initiatives with business strategies. The ERM framework should prioritize the most significant risks—financial, operational, and strategic—and establish mechanisms for ongoing monitoring and response.

Post-initial assessment, the ERM process must embed within the company's culture, fostering awareness and accountability at all levels. Developing specific success criteria for risk mitigation efforts, creating a timeline with milestones, and defining evaluation criteria are essential steps. Additionally, selecting suitable contractual mechanisms for risk transfer and response ensures organized and professional risk handling.

Conclusion

Blue Wood’s current business underperformance necessitates immediate action. Establishing an effective ERM framework will enable the company to anticipate, evaluate, and control risks efficiently. This proactive approach will help restore financial stability, support strategic decision-making, and build resilience against external shocks. Senior management’s support and a clear implementation plan are crucial for success. Ultimately, integrating ERM into the company’s strategic fabric will provide a solid foundation for sustainable growth and competitiveness in a dynamic market.

References

  • Fraser, J., & Simkins, B. (2016). Enterprise Risk Management: Today's Leading Research and Best Practices for Tomorrow's Executives. Wiley.
  • Hopkin, P. (2018). Fundamentals of Risk Management. Kogan Page.
  • Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The Value of Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795-822.
  • Lam, J. (2014). Enterprise Risk Management: From Incentives to Controls. Wiley.
  • McShane, M. K., Nair, L., & Rustambekov, E. (2011). Does Enterprise Risk Management Increase Firm Value? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26(4), 585-613.
  • Power, M. (2009). The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty. Demos.
  • Rao, P., & Young, R. (2019). Managing Currency and Commodity Risks in the International Food Industry. Food Control, 100, 111-125.
  • Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
  • V risico, P. (2018). How to Embed Risk Management in Corporate Strategy. Risk Management Magazine, 65(6), 22-27.
  • Zhu, Y., & Geng, Y. (2013). Drivers for the Circular Economy and Circular Capital. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 44-51.

Related Assignments