Entwistle Review Chapters 8 And 11

Entwistle Review Chapters 8 11

Instructions: You will write a review of Entwistle chapters 8-11. This review must be 3-5 double-spaced pages (not including the title and reference pages) and must be created in a Microsoft Word document. Use the following guidelines to create your paper: Entwistle, D. N. (2015). Integrative approaches to psychology and Christianity: An introduction to worldview issues, philosophical foundations, and models of integration (3rd ed.). Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers. ISBN: .

1. Provide a title page in current APA format including only your name, the paper title (referring to the article title), and the institutional affiliation (Liberty University). Keep in mind that current APA recommends that the title length not exceed 12 words.

Use the summary into sections with the following headings: Summary, Interaction, and Application (review the current APA Manual for guidance on levels of headings if needed).

2. Develop a summary of the main concepts from Entwistle, Chapters 8-11 in approximately two pages. Be appropriately concise but also be adequately complete in your ideas. Prove that you comprehend the main ideas by writing a clear and succinct summary.

The summary is not a commentary or listing of topics but rather a discussion of the core ideas (main ideas) in the chapters. If you miss the main ideas, you lack an understanding of the complete message of the chapters. In this paper, please make sure that you identify all of the models that Entwistle discusses. Cite the book in-text (Entwistle, 2015) at least once per paragraph and include page numbers for direct quotations (Entwistle, 2015, p. 123).

As a general rule of thumb, please limit your direct quotations to no more than three short quotations per written page. As a graduate student, you are encouraged to use your own voice and tell your reader what the authors said, rather than using lengthy quotes. Your professor wants to read what your own summary description of the text is.

3. In your own words, interact (in approximately 1 page) with the chapters.

Appropriate comments for this part of the paper should include, but are not limited to: your initial response to the chapters, insights you gained from reading these chapters, other thoughts you have that might further enhance the discussion of your article, and especially which model best suits yourself and why. Your subjective comments in this section must be clearly tied to main points from the article, not peripheral ideas.

4. In your final section (in approximately 1 page) write how you would apply the information you have learned from this article to a particular counseling situation or to yourself. You are encouraged to write about how this concept of Entwistle’s models will impact how you will operate as a professional counselor in the future.

Also, consider other sources that you have encountered in your life up to this point that relate to Entwistle’s ideas, such as other textbooks, journal articles, Scripture passages, and even ethical codes such as those in the ACA Code of Ethics (2014) or the AACC Code of Ethics (2014).

5. Please make sure to include a Reference page and properly cite the Entwistle (2015) book, along with any other sources of information you cite in your paper. Point values for the paper, as well as for writing/current APA, can be found on the grading rubric. Remember that all papers in this program follow current APA format and are written per APA Professional (not APA student paper) standards.

Paper For Above instruction

The chapters 8 through 11 of Entwistle’s (2015) work offer a comprehensive exploration of the various models of integrating psychology and Christianity, emphasizing the importance of worldview in shaping how psychologists and counselors approach the integration process. These chapters serve as a pivotal point in understanding how faith-based perspectives can coexist with psychological practice, providing a framework for professionals to navigate complex ethical and theoretical boundaries.

Summary

Entwistle (2015) introduces three primary models of integration: the Congregation Model, the Integration Model, and the Theological Model, each representing distinct approaches to harmonizing psychology and Christian faith. The Congregation Model prioritizes the separate existence of faith and psychology, advocating for Christians to focus on their spiritual duties in church and separate their counseling practices from their faith commitments. Conversely, the Integration Model seeks to find common ground, emphasizing compatibility between psychological theories and Christian doctrine, often blending the two seamlessly within therapeutic contexts. The Theological Model, on the other hand, emphasizes the supremacy of biblical doctrine, asserting that psychological theories must be subordinate to theological truths (Entwistle, 2015, pp. 210-211).

Furthermore, Entwistle discusses the philosophical foundations underlying these models, such as foundationalism and non-foundationalism, which determine how knowledge from faith and science can interact. The chapter expands on the importance of developing a coherent worldview, illustrating that the choice of model is inherently tied to one's theological commitments and philosophical worldview. For instance, those with a strong theological foundation tend to favor the Theological Model, while those emphasizing professional scientific standards may lean toward the Integration Model.

Another significant concept in these chapters is the role of ethical considerations and possible conflicts that might arise from the integration process. Entwistle asserts that counselors must be acutely aware of their own worldview commitments and the potential impact on clients, advocating for transparency and intentionality in their practice. The chapters conclude by emphasizing that no model is universally superior; rather, each has strengths and limitations, and the decision on which to adopt should be reflective of one's faith worldview and professional philosophy.

Interaction

Reading these chapters prompted a reflection on my own worldview and how it aligns with the different models presented by Entwistle. Initially, I found myself leaning toward the Integration Model because of its flexibility and acknowledgment of scientific rigor while maintaining Christian principles. This approach resonates with my desire to integrate faith naturally into my counseling practice without compromising scientific integrity. Entwistle’s (2015) description of the Theological Model also resonated with me, as I appreciate a worldview that prioritizes biblical truth, though I acknowledge that this approach may sometimes limit engagement with secular psychological theories.

One insight I gained from these chapters is the importance of intentionality in choosing an integration model. As a future counselor, I recognize that my personal faith commitments significantly influence my clinical approach. The chapters clarified that being conscious of this influence and maintaining ethical clarity is essential for effective and honest counseling. I also appreciated the emphasis on worldview development; understanding the philosophical underpinnings of each model helps in choosing the most congruent approach for oneself and clients.

In terms of which model best suits me, I believe I identify most closely with the Integration Model because it allows for a balanced approach that respects psychological science while upholding Christian values. I believe this model facilitates respectful dialogue between faith and science, allowing me to adapt to diverse client backgrounds and needs, which is crucial in a multicultural and pluralistic society. However, I also find value in aspects of the Theological Model, especially for clients whose faith is central to their healing process.

Application

Applying the knowledge from these chapters in my future counseling practice involves deliberate reflection on my own worldview and the models I choose to adopt. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each model enables me to be flexible and ethical in my approach. For example, if working with clients from a secular background, I might favor an integration approach that emphasizes common ground while avoiding conflicts with core faith principles. Conversely, with clients who prioritize biblical authority, a Theological Model might be more appropriate.

Additionally, these chapters inform my awareness of potential conflicts and ethical dilemmas involved in integrating faith and psychology. Recognizing my own biases and assumptions will help me maintain professionalism and transparency. The ethical codes, such as those outlined by the ACA and AACC, reinforce the importance of respecting client autonomy and cultural diversity, principles that align with an intentional and respectful application of these models (ACA, 2014; AACC, 2014).

Furthermore, embracing an integrative approach shaped by these models will enhance my capacity to serve clients holistically, addressing both their psychological and spiritual needs. For instance, in treating anxiety or depression, I could utilize psychological interventions while incorporating spiritual practices or biblical principles when appropriate. This balanced approach can foster deeper healing and growth, respecting the client’s worldview and fostering trust.

In conclusion, Entwistle’s (2015) discussion of the different models has broadened my understanding of how faith and psychology can coexist within a professional counseling context. Moving forward, I aim to develop a nuanced, ethical, and flexible approach that aligns with my personal convictions and professional responsibilities, ultimately contributing to more effective and compassionate client care.

References

• American Counseling Association. (2014). ACA code of ethics. https://www.counseling.org/resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf
• Association of Christian Counselors. (2014). AACC code of ethics. https://www.aacc.net/about-us/code-of-ethics/
• Entwistle, D. N. (2015). Integrative approaches to psychology and Christianity: An introduction to worldview issues, philosophical foundations, and models of integration (3rd ed.). Wipf and Stock.
• Insert additional scholarly references here in APA format to support the discussion.