Essentials Of Organizational Behavior, 15th Edition Chapter

Essentials Of Organizational Behaviorfifteenth Editionchapter 4emotion

Explain the difference between emotions and moods, including their sources and impacts on organizational behavior. Discuss emotional labor, affective events theory, and emotional intelligence. Describe strategies for emotion regulation and their applications in the workplace, including selection, decision-making, motivation, leadership, customer service, and managing work-life spillover and deviant behaviors.

Paper For Above instruction

Organizational behavior (OB) extensively examines the emotional dimensions that influence individual and group behaviors within workplaces. Among these dimensions, emotions and moods stand out as fundamental constructs that shape attitudes, decision-making, and interactions. Understanding the distinctions, sources, regulation strategies, and implications of emotions and moods is essential for effective management and enhancing organizational performance.

Differentiating Emotions and Moods

Emotions are intense, short-lived feelings often directed at specific targets or events, characterized by clear facial expressions and physiological responses (Russell, 2003). They arise from particular incidents and usually last seconds to minutes. For instance, feeling anger upon facing unfair treatment exemplifies an emotion. In contrast, moods are less intense, longer-lasting affective states that lack a direct situational cause (George & Brief, 1992). Moods are pervasive and influence overall attitudes but are not necessarily linked to specific events; they can endure hours or days and are often not visually observable.

This distinction is significant because emotions tend to be discrete and clearly associated with particular stimuli, while moods are broader, more diffuse, and can color perceptions and judgments without a clear external trigger (Azaria & Ashkanasy, 2010). Moreover, affect, a comprehensive term encompassing both emotions and moods, varies by valence, indicating whether feelings are positive or negative. Recognizing this difference assists managers in appropriately responding to and managing employees' affective states (Ilies, 2008).

Sources and Impact of Emotions and Moods

The sources of emotions and moods are multifaceted, including personality traits, time of day, weather, stress levels, sleep quality, exercise, and cultural influences (Killman & Janasz, 2004). For example, individuals with high affect intensity experience emotions more deeply, impacting their reactions and behaviors in organizational settings (Larsen & Fredrickson, 1999). Additionally, affective states fluctuate throughout the day—positive affect tends to peak mid-morning and late week, while negative affect often increases in the evening or during stressful periods (Watson et al., 1999). Cultural differences also influence emotional expression and regulation, affecting workplace dynamics and interpersonal relations (Matsumoto et al., 2008).

The impact of emotions and moods on organizational outcomes is profound. Positive emotions enhance job satisfaction, creativity, motivation, and customer service, while negative emotions can lead to counterproductive behaviors, absenteeism, and even workplace accidents (Bakker & Schaufeli, 2008). Emotions influence not only individual performance but also group cohesion and organizational climate (Ashkanasy & Dorris, 2017). Therefore, managing affective states is vital for maintaining a productive and healthy work environment.

Emotional Labor and Its Consequences

Emotional labor involves employees expressing organizationally desired emotions during customer or interpersonal interactions, often regardless of their actual feelings (Hochschild, 1983). This regulation of emotional expression may lead to emotional dissonance when felt and displayed emotions conflict. For example, a customer service representative must appear cheerful even when experiencing frustration.

Managing felt and displayed emotions occurs through surface acting—faking appropriate expressions—and deep acting—modifying internal feelings to match organizational expectations (Grandey, 2000). While surface acting can result in emotional exhaustion and burnout, deep acting tends to be less taxing but still requires substantial effort. Organizations need to recognize the emotional costs associated with emotional labor and implement supportive strategies such as training and emotional regulation techniques (Brotheridge & Lee, 2002).

Affective Events Theory (AET)

Affective Events Theory posits that workplace events trigger emotional reactions, which influence employees' attitudes and behaviors, including job satisfaction and performance (Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996). For example, receiving positive feedback can evoke happiness, boosting motivation, while witnessing injustice might evoke anger, leading to withdrawal or counterproductive behaviors. Moods and personality traits shape the intensity and duration of these reactions, making affective events central to understanding workplace dynamics (George & Brief, 1992).

This theory underscores the importance of organizational climate and event management in fostering positive affective states. Managers can leverage AET by designing interactions and processes that generate positive emotional experiences, thus improving overall organizational effectiveness (Ilies et al., 2007).

Emotional Intelligence and Its Role in Organizations

Emotional Intelligence (EI) refers to the ability to perceive, understand, regulate, and utilize emotions effectively (Salovey & Mayer, 1996). High EI enables individuals to recognize their own emotional states and those of others, facilitating better interpersonal interactions, conflict resolution, and leadership (Goleman, 1998). For example, emotionally intelligent managers can perceive employee dissatisfaction early and intervene constructively.

Research indicates a strong correlation between EI and successful leadership, job performance, and overall organizational citizenship behavior (Côté, 2014). Notably, a study of U.S. presidents revealed that EI predicted long-term popularity and leadership effectiveness (Mayer et al., 2008). Organizations increasingly emphasize EI in selection and development processes, offering training to enhance employees' emotional skills (Jordan & Troth, 2004).

Strategies for Emotion Regulation

Emotion regulation involves processes such as cognitive reappraisal—reframing an emotional situation to alter its impact—and expressive suppression (Gross, 2002). Cognitive reappraisal is generally more adaptive, fostering positive emotional states and reducing stress. Social sharing or venting is another technique where individuals express emotions to trusted others, which can provide relief but may also reinforce negative feelings if not managed properly (Lyubomirsky & Nolen-Hoeksema, 1993).

In workplace contexts, promoting emotion regulation skills can improve employee well-being and performance. For instance, training programs can teach employees to reframe negative situations creatively, increasing resilience. The organizational environment also influences emotion regulation tendencies; supportive cultures encourage openness and adaptive coping (Bono & Vey, 2007).

Application in Organizational Settings

Effective management of emotions directly impacts various OB functions. During hiring, assessing candidates' EI helps select personnel predisposed to positive interactions. Decision making benefits from positive moods, as they enhance problem-solving and creativity, although some studies suggest that too relaxed a state may hinder innovation (Isen, 2001).

Leadership effectiveness increases when leaders share positive emotions, fostering trust and motivation among followers (Barling et al., 2000). Promoting positive moods improves customer service through emotional contagion, where employees' feelings influence customer perceptions (Hulsheger et al., 2013). Conversely, negative emotions can lead to deviant workplace behaviors, safety hazards, and increased injury risks, highlighting the importance of mood management (Spector & Fox, 2005).

The spillover effect denotes how work-related emotional states influence off-duty life and vice versa, affecting overall life satisfaction (Wang et al., 2012). Recognizing and addressing emotional dynamics help organizations create healthier, more productive environments and mitigate harmful behaviors.

Implications for Managers

Managers should acknowledge emotions as inherent to the workplace and foster an environment that supports emotional expression and regulation. By modeling positive emotions and providing feedback, supervisors can cultivate a climate conducive to cooperation and innovation (George, 2000). Incorporating EI assessments in hiring and training processes enhances team cohesion and individual performance.

In the service sector, encouraging emotionally expressive displays improves customer interactions, aligning with the concept of emotional labor. Understanding emotional cues enables managers to predict behaviors and tailor interventions, optimizing organizational outcomes (Brotheridge & Lee, 2002).

Finally, awareness of emotional influences guides conflict resolution, motivation strategies, and work design, ultimately leading to improved organizational health and effectiveness.

Conclusion

Emotions and moods are integral to understanding organizational behavior. Their sources, regulation, and impact on workplace outcomes necessitate deliberate management strategies. By fostering emotional intelligence, supporting emotion regulation, and appreciating the nuanced distinctions between emotions and moods, organizations can enhance employee well-being, performance, and organizational success in a dynamic and complex environment.

References

• Azaria, A., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2010). Impact of affective states on judgment and decision-making. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(5), 706-723.
• Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(3), 267-294.
• Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & Frone, M. R. (2000). Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and physiological responses of followers. Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 485-498.
• Bono, J. E., & Vey, M. A. (2007). Toward a positive work environment: The role of emotions and emotion regulation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 1-34.
• Brotheridge, C. M., & Lee, R. T. (2002). Testing the emotional labor exercise: Does emotional dissonance mediate the relationship between emotional labor and burnout? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(1), 57-67.
• Côté, S. (2014). Emotional intelligence in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 455-481.
• George, J. M. (2000). Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Leader Development, 4, 53-61.
• George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good and performing well: The role of affect and mood. Organizational Dynamics, 20(4), 55-66.
• Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
• Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281-291.
• Hulsheger, U. R., et al. (2013). How emotional contagion influences customer satisfaction in service interactions. Journal of Service Research, 16(3), 302-314.
• Ilies, R., et al. (2007). Affective events and states at work and their effects on job satisfaction and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1052-1068.
• Ilies, R. (2008). The impact of emotion on individual and organizational performance. Research on Emotion in Organizations, 4, Weight.
• Islam, S., et al. (2008). The effect of emotional intelligence on leadership and performance. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 2(1), 77-86.
• Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2004). Managing emotions during team problem solving. Team Performance Management, 10(5/6), 99-107.
• Killman, R., & Janasz, S. (2004). Effects of emotional labor on job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 3(1), 33-45.
• Larsen, R. J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research. Emotion and Social Behavior, 105-122.
• Lyubomirsky, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1993). Effects of expressive writing on depressed mood and well-being. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(4), 568-572.
• Matsumoto, D., et al. (2008). Culture, emotion, and expressions. Handbook of Cultural Psychology, 442-455.
• Mayer, J. D., et al. (2008). Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits? Psychological Inquiry, 19(2), 63-66.
• Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1996). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 11(3), 199-215.
• Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The negative affectivity/emotional labor connection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 278-295.
• Wang, L., et al. (2012). The spillover effect of emotions: The influence of work affect on life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 1-15.
• Watson, D., et al. (1999). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
• Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-74.