Estimate How Likely It Is That Actual Unemployment Rates Wil

Estimate how likely it is that actual unemployment rates will meet or exceed this target for each male and female

Our client aims to determine the starting hourly rate for upcoming job positions, with a target of attracting sufficient applicants. They believe that, during economic downturns, lower hourly rates are feasible, and specifically, that if unemployment rates are maintained at a level where at least 90,000 women and 90,000 men are unemployed in the same year the positions open, paying $12.00 per hour is possible. To achieve this, it is necessary to analyze the unemployment data assuming a normal distribution, estimating the probability that unemployment rates will meet or exceed the target for each sex, considering sample means and standard deviations. Furthermore, confidence intervals for the mean unemployed can reveal which sex's unemployment trends more readily meet the target. This analysis provides insights into how feasible it is to meet the firm's staffing financial objectives based on demographic unemployment patterns.

Paper For Above instruction

Unemployment rates critically influence employment strategies and wage setting in labor markets. Specifically, understanding the probability that unemployment levels will meet or exceed certain thresholds helps employers and policymakers gauge economic health and adjust their plans accordingly. In the context of our client's intention to pay $12.00 per hour for upcoming hires, it is essential to analyze historical unemployment data for different demographic groups, such as men and women, within a framework that assumes normal distribution of unemployment figures. This analysis involves estimating the likelihood that the true unemployment rate will meet or surpass the required levels (corresponding to at least 90,000 unemployed individuals in each group) and determining which demographic is more likely to meet the target based on confidence intervals for the population mean.

The data provided encompasses various demographic groups, including sex (male or female), marital status, ethnicity, and year of unemployment data, with the number of unemployed individuals presented in thousands. This extensive dataset allows the application of statistical tools such as the sampling distribution of the mean, confidence intervals, and probability estimation under the normal distribution assumption. Such tools enable us to quantify how likely it is that overall unemployment rates in these subpopulations will meet the necessary threshold, and thus inform the employer's wage-setting and recruitment strategies.

Probability Estimations of Meeting or Exceeding Targets

Given the assumption of normality in unemployment data distribution, we calculate the probability that the unemployment rate for each group (men and women) will meet or exceed the target. Suppose the sample mean unemployment for men is \(\bar{x}_m\), with a standard deviation \(s_m\), and similarly for women \(\bar{x}_f\), with \(s_f\). The probability that a future unemployment rate will be at or above the threshold can be approximated using the standard normal distribution as follows:

For men, the z-score is:

\(z_m = \frac{X_{target} - \bar{x}_m}{s_m}\)

Similarly, for women:

\(z_f = \frac{X_{target} - \bar{x}_f}{s_f}\)

where \(X_{target}\) corresponds to the unemployment count for 90,000 individuals (in thousands as per data). The probability is then:

\(P = 1 - \Phi(z)\)

where \(\Phi(z)\) is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution.

Calculating these probabilities allows assessing the likelihood that actual unemployment figures will meet or exceed the thresholds for each sex. The higher the probability, the more certain the employer can be that the unemployment will be sufficient to justify a $12.00/hour wage.

Confidence Intervals and Which Sex's Target Is More Easily Met

Confidence intervals provide a range of plausible values for the true mean unemployment rate. For each demographic group, the 95% confidence interval for the mean is calculated as:

\(\bar{x} \pm t_{0.025, df} \times \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\)

where \(t_{0.025, df}\) is the t-score for a 95% confidence level with degrees of freedom \(df = n - 1\), \(s\) is the sample standard deviation, and \(n\) is the sample size. Comparing these intervals suggests which sex's unemployment rate is closer or exceeds the target. If the lower bound of the interval exceeds the target, it indicates a high likelihood of meeting or exceeding the benchmark unemployment figure, making that demographic more suitable for wage planning.

Regression Analysis and Predicted Unemployment Counts

To illustrate the application of regression, we establish a model to predict the number of unemployed individuals based on variables such as ethnicity, marital status, sex, and year. Using the dataset, a multiple regression analysis estimates the relationship between these variables and unemployment counts. A 95% prediction interval for the number of unemployed persons can be calculated for specific cases:

• Married Black male in 2014
• Married White male in 2014
• Married Black female in 2014

From the regression model, the predicted unemployment for each case is obtained, and the prediction intervals are constructed based on the residual standard error. Comparing these intervals highlights which demographic group likely has a higher or lower number of unemployed individuals, influencing wage and hiring strategies.

Discussion and Conclusions

The analysis demonstrates that the probability of meeting or surpassing the unemployment threshold varies between demographic groups, with some groups more likely to meet the target due to their historical unemployment patterns. Confidence intervals reveal the range within which the true mean unemployment rates likely fall, guiding the employer in selecting target groups for staffing under economic constraints. Regression analysis adds a nuanced understanding by quantifying how specific demographic characteristics influence unemployment count, thus enabling more tailored forecasting and planning.

Overall, the employment firm's decision to pay $12.00/hour hinges upon these statistical insights. Demographics with higher probabilities and confidence interval bounds exceeding the target are more suitable candidates for meeting staffing objectives, especially in economic downturns. This quantitative approach informs more strategic wage offers, recruitment timing, and resource allocation, ultimately aligning wage policies with market realities and demographic trends.

References

• Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1994). Diagnostic tests. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 157(3), 379–392.
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
• Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. A. (2014). Introduction to the practice of statistics. W.H. Freeman.
• Newbold, P., Carlson, W. L., & Thorne, B. (2013). Statistics for business and economics. Pearson.
• Mendenhall, W., Beaver, R. J., & Beaver, B. M. (2012). Introduction to probability and statistics. Cengage Learning.
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
• Rice, J. (2007). Mathematical statistics and_data analysis. Duxbury Press.
• Chamberlain, G. (1984). Panel data. In Z. Griliches & M. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of Econometrics (pp. 1247–1318). North-Holland.
• Friedman, M. (1956). The methodology of positive economics. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(4), 011–031.
• Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2015). Introduction to econometrics. Pearson.