Ethical Concerns 4 – Ebonnie McDonald Wald

ETHICAL cONCERNS 4 Ethical Concerns QuiEbonnie McDonald Walden University 02/09/19 Nurs. 6512 Dr. V. Suresh

Ethical dilemmas are prevalent in healthcare, particularly when patient or parental decisions conflict with recommended medical interventions. As nurse practitioners, it is vital to navigate these situations with professionalism and a sound understanding of ethical principles. One common scenario involves parents refusing vaccinations for their children, which raises concerns about individual autonomy versus community health.

This paper explores the necessary health assessment information and approaches a nurse practitioner can utilize to ethically resolve a situation where parents oppose vaccinating a five-year-old child prior to kindergarten enrollment. Vaccinations serve as critical preventive measures to protect against serious diseases and infections. Therefore, understanding the reasons behind parental refusal is essential in addressing their concerns effectively.

Questions to assess parental reasoning include inquiries about religious or cultural beliefs that influence their decision, specific concerns or misconceptions about immunizations, knowledge of the purpose and importance of vaccines, awareness of the risks associated with non-vaccination, and understanding of school vaccination requirements. For example, a practitioner might ask: "Can you explain why you have chosen not to vaccinate your son?" and "Are you aware that some school districts require up-to-date vaccinations for enrollment?" These questions aim to elicit the parent's beliefs and factual knowledge to facilitate informed dialogue.

Healthcare providers should remain objective, providing evidence-based information about the safety and benefits of vaccines while respecting parental autonomy. According to the CDC (2018), practitioners should strongly recommend vaccinations, emphasizing their role in preventing life-threatening diseases and protecting community health. They should also explain the concept of herd immunity and the societal responsibility to minimize infectious disease spread (CDC, 2018). The ethical principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence underpin vaccination advocacy, suggesting that promoting vaccination aims to do good and prevent harm not only to individual patients but also to the broader community (Hendrix, Strum, Zimet, & Meslin, 2016).

Respect for personal autonomy is a foundational element of ethical medical practice, yet it must be balanced with public health concerns. In cases of parental refusal, practitioners should ensure that parents are equipped with accurate information and understand the potential health risks of non-vaccination. When misinformation or misconceptions are identified, correcting these through evidence-based education is critical. The American Academy of Pediatrics (2019) emphasizes the importance of respectful, informed discussions that empower parents to make health decisions aligned with scientific consensus.

Legal and ethical frameworks guide practitioners in managing vaccine refusal. They need to consider child welfare, societal obligations, and the rights of parents. Recognizing that vaccination refusal can pose significant harm to the child and community, healthcare providers must navigate these conflicts with sensitivity. When appropriate, they may involve ethics committees or legal resources, especially when refusal endangers the child's health or public safety. The balance between respecting parental rights and safeguarding public health remains a core ethical challenge in pediatric care (Arora, Morris, & Jacobs, 2018).

In conclusion, resolving ethical dilemmas related to vaccination refusal requires a nuanced approach grounded in ethical principles, clear communication, and factual education. Nurse practitioners must advocate for children’s health through informed and respectful engagement with parents, balancing individual autonomy with societal safety. By fostering trust and understanding, healthcare providers can better navigate these complex ethical issues and promote vaccination uptake to protect public health effectively.

Paper For Above instruction

References

• American Academy of Pediatrics. (2019). Immunizations: Refusal to Vaccinate. Retrieved from https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/immunizations/Pages/Refusal-to-Vaccinate.aspx
• Arora, K.S., Morris, J., & Jacobs, A.J. (2018). Refusal of vaccination: A test to balance societal and individual interests. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 29(3), 182-193.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2018). Talking with parents about vaccines for infants. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/index.html
• Hendrix, K. S., Sturm, L. A., Zimet, G. D., & Meslin, E. M. (2016). Ethics and childhood vaccination policy in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 106(2), 226-229. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302952
• Omer, S. B., Salmon, D. A., Orenstein, W. A., deHart, M. P., & Halsey, N. (2019). Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization laws, and the risks of preventable disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(19), 1981-1988.
• Leask, J., & Hardy, J. (2017). Vaccine hesitancy in Australia: Bridging research and practice. Australian Family Physician, 46(7), 419-423.
• World Health Organization. (2019). Ten threats to global health in 2019. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
• Feemster, K. A., & Orenstein, W. A. (2017). Understanding vaccine hesitancy. Pediatric Annals, 36(2), 67-73.
• Smith, P. J., Kennedy, A. M., Wooten, K., Gust, D. A., & Pickering, L. K. (2020). Associations between health care providers’ influence on parents’ vaccination decisions and vaccination coverage. Pediatrics, 128(5), 847-855.
• Naidoo, J., & Wichman, W. (2018). Balancing individual rights and public health: Ethical considerations in vaccination. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(4), 627-636.