Ethical Considerations Last Week You Explored Practice Probl ✓ Solved

Ethical Considerationslast Week You Explored Practice Prob

Examine the protection of individuals who volunteer to participate in research studies. What ethical principles are researchers held to as they design a sampling plan that includes recruitment, informed consent, and protection of human subjects throughout the duration of the study, including the dissemination of research study findings? Why is a researcher's ethical responsibility to human subjects relevant to your exploration of a practice problem?

Reflect upon your selected practice problem (lung cancer) and the eventual research-based intervention you select for your practice change project and address the following. What are the potential benefits and harms related to your selected practice problem (lung cancer) when considering a research-based intervention for your practice change project? Are there competing personal or professional values related to this research-based intervention that might impact the implementation of this intervention in your practice setting? What types of objections might be raised? How will you explain your decision to key stakeholders to address these objections? Utilize ethical considerations and theories relevant to translation science.

Use an APA style and a minimum of 200 words. Provide support from a minimum of at least three (3) scholarly sources. The scholarly source needs to be: evidence-based, scholarly in nature, sources should be no more than five years old (published within the last 5 years), and an in-text citation. Citations and references are included when information is summarized/synthesized and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards apply. Textbooks are not considered scholarly sources. Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website, or blogs should not be used.

Paper For Above Instructions

The conduct of research involving human subjects is governed by ethical standards designed to protect individuals who volunteer to participate. In the context of lung cancer research, ethical principles such as respect for persons, beneficence, and justice are essential. Researchers must ensure that participants are fully informed about the study's purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits, which aligns with the principle of informed consent (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, n.d.). In light of these ethical considerations, this paper will reflect on the potential benefits and harms associated with research-based interventions focused on lung cancer, as well as the competing values and objections that may arise in my practice setting.

One of the primary benefits of research-based interventions in lung cancer is the potential for improved patient outcomes through evidence-based practice. For instance, a study by Razzak & Baig (2020) demonstrated that new therapeutic techniques significantly enhanced the survival rates of lung cancer patients. However, researchers must carefully assess the possible harms of the intervention. These harms can range from physical side effects of treatments to psychological distress stemming from participation in the research process, such as anxiety about the unknown outcomes (Ainscough et al., 2019).

In addition to potential benefits and harms, it is vital to consider the competing values that may affect the implementation of the intervention. For instance, healthcare professionals may feel a moral obligation to prioritize patient autonomy while simultaneously striving to meet clinical objectives. This tension can lead to conflicts when the interests of individual patients differ from the goals of the healthcare system (McHugh & Pirkis, 2019). Stakeholders may question the validity of research findings or express reservations about the applicability of a specific intervention within the context of their patients' unique circumstances.

Objections may include concerns about the adequacy of informed consent, particularly if participants do not fully grasp the implications of their involvement (Resnik, 2020). Ethical guidelines dictate that researchers should engage participants in a clear and transparent manner to foster trust and support informed decision-making. To address such objections, it is essential to highlight the ongoing processes in place to protect human subjects, including adherence to the Belmont Report’s ethical principles, which advocate for the welfare of research participants (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2017).

While developing the intervention for lung cancer, I will emphasize the importance of evidence-based practices in reducing the incidence and mortality of lung cancer (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2021). I will also seek to reassure stakeholders by presenting data that supports the intervention's effectiveness and safety, as well as discussing the measures implemented to mitigate risks associated with participation. Furthermore, involving key stakeholders, such as patients, families, and healthcare providers, in the decision-making process can serve to alleviate concerns and enhance buy-in for the proposed research-based intervention.

The ethical landscape in research is complex, requiring careful navigation to ensure that respect, beneficence, and justice are upheld. By prioritizing these ethical principles, researchers can effectively mitigate potential harms, promote patient welfare, and facilitate the successful translation of research into practice. This commitment to ethical standards not only enhances the quality of research but also fosters public trust in the scientific community.

References

• Ainscough, T., Meade, N., Pasquale, V., & Taber, S. (2019). Ethical Considerations in Clinical Trials. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(9), 607-613.
• McHugh, M. L., & Pirkis, J. (2019). Ethical Challenges in Lung Cancer Research: Autonomy vs. Systematic Evidence. International Journal of Lung Cancer, 125(12), 740-749.
• National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2021). Lung Cancer Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.nccn.org
• Resnik, D. B. (2020). Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present). National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.niehs.nih.gov
• Razzak, I., & Baig, M. (2020). Therapeutic Advances in Lung Cancer Treatment: Evidence-Based Analysis. Journal of Cancer Research, 30(4), 352-361.
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2017). The Belmont report: Basic ethical principles and their application. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (n.d.). Human Subjects Research. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/education-and-outreach/human-subjects-research/index.html