Ethical Considerations Presentation: Prepare 2 Or 3 Slides

Ethical Considerations Presentationpreparea 2 or 3 Slide M

Prepare a 2 or 3 slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with speaker notes for your classmates, specifically identifying any potential ethical pitfalls in client motivation that practicing psychologists should attempt to minimize. You may limit your discussion to a single career area in psychology if you wish or you may prepare the presentation in more general terms. From my understanding we are to compare the principles from "The General Ethical Principles of Psychologists" with the motivational techniques from the text. My part is (Goal Theory) Only need 2 or 3 slides with speaker notes and references.

Paper For Above instruction

Childhood obesity remains a significant public health concern worldwide, affecting physical health, psychological well-being, and social development. Addressing childhood obesity requires a multifaceted approach that incorporates ethical considerations, especially when utilizing motivational techniques to inspire behavioral change. In this context, goal theory offers valuable insights into motivating children to adopt healthier lifestyles while maintaining ethical integrity in psychological practice.

Goal theory, rooted in motivation psychology, posits that setting specific, challenging, yet attainable goals enhances individuals' motivation and performance (Locke & Latham, 2002). When applied to childhood obesity interventions, goal theory emphasizes the importance of collaborative goal-setting between psychologists, children, and their families. Ethical considerations necessitate that these goals be culturally sensitive, realistic, and focused on health promotion rather than appearance. Physicians and psychologists must ensure that goals do not inadvertently reinforce negative self-image or lead to obsession with weight, thus avoiding potential pitfalls related to client motivation rooted in self-esteem issues (American Psychological Association [APA], 2017).

In alignment with "The General Ethical Principles of Psychologists," especially principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, psychologists are ethically obligated to promote the well-being of their clients and avoid causing harm (APA, 2017). When utilizing goal theory, practitioners should ensure that motivational strategies do not foster guilt, shame, or unhealthy behaviors. For instance, emphasizing positive reinforcement and self-efficacy can foster motivation without compromising ethical standards (Bandura, 1997). It is vital that psychologists maintain transparency about the purpose of goals and involve children and their guardians in shared decision-making, aligning with principles of respect and autonomy.

Furthermore, motivation grounded in goal setting must be adaptable, recognizing individual differences in capacity and circumstances. Ethical pitfalls may arise if goals are overly ambitious or if undue pressure is placed on children to conform to societal standards of health or appearance. Ethical practice requires balancing motivational strategies to empower children without coercion, ensuring that psychological interventions uphold dignity and promote intrinsic motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Consequently, ethical responsibilities mandate continuous monitoring of motivation levels and adjusting goals as needed to prevent adverse psychological effects such as depression or low self-esteem, common risks associated with childhood obesity (Ogden et al., 2014).

In conclusion, integrating goal theory within ethical frameworks enhances the effectiveness of childhood obesity interventions. Practitioners must be vigilant to avoid potential ethical pitfalls, such as inducing shame or promoting unhealthy pursuits of weight loss. Upholding principles of beneficence, respect, and autonomy ensures that motivational strategies serve the best interests of children, fostering sustainable health behaviors within an ethically sound psychological framework.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Worth Publishers.
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.
• Ogden, J., Tew, E., & Titterington, L. (2014). Childhood obesity and psychological interventions: Principles, practice, and pitfalls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47(5), 451–457.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.