Ethical Decision Making Model 656604

Ethical Decision Making Modelethical Decision Making At An Individual

Ethical decision-making at an individual level involves recognizing an ethical dilemma (moral awareness), making a judgment about what is right or wrong (moral judgment), and then acting in accordance with that judgment (ethical behavior). Several variables influence this process, including personal values, cognitive biases shaped by personal history, organizational standards such as codes of conduct, and cultural factors. This dynamic process underscores that ethical decisions are rarely uniform; they are influenced by individual differences and contextual factors, which makes understanding the pathway to ethical behavior critical for professionals in disciplines such as healthcare.

Paper For Above instruction

Ethical decision-making is a fundamental aspect of professional behavior, especially in fields like healthcare where decisions can profoundly impact patient outcomes and trust. This paper explores the model of ethical decision-making at an individual level—comprising moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior—and analyzes its application through three case studies: hospital readmission reduction, a physician's adherence to clinical guidelines, and childhood vaccination ethics. These examples illustrate the complexities and the importance of the ethical decision-making process in real-world healthcare scenarios.

Moral Awareness in Healthcare Contexts

The first step in ethical decision-making involves moral awareness—recognizing the existence of an ethical dilemma. When healthcare professionals confront situations that challenge their personal morals or organizational standards, their sensitivity to these issues determines whether they engage in a thoughtful decision process. For instance, Caleb Powell's initiative to reduce hospital readmissions exemplifies moral awareness; he perceives the importance of balancing cost efficiency, patient satisfaction, and ethical patient care. Recognizing such dilemmas requires healthcare leaders to be attuned to not just clinical outcomes but also to the moral implications of organizational policies (Trevino & Nelson, 2007).

Moral Judgment and Factors Influencing Ethical Decisions

The second component, moral judgment, involves evaluating options and determining what constitutes the ethically right course of action. Multiple factors influence this judgment, including personal morals, biases, organizational policies, or cultural norms. In the case of Dr. Lacey, the emergency department director faces an ethical judgment about patient safety versus respect for an esteemed colleague. The decision to restrict Dr. Lacey's privileges hinges on assessing the risks posed by outdated practices conflicting with evidence-based guidelines and patient safety. Ethical judgment becomes complex when personal biases and organizational pressures conflict, necessitating careful deliberation (Treviño & Nelson, 2007).

Ethical Behavior and Its Implementation in Practice

The final step—ethical behavior—entails acting in accordance with the moral judgment. Yet, various barriers can hinder this, including organizational culture, peer influence, or personal discomfort. The case involving Dr. Lacey demonstrates how professional accountability and organizational policies must override personal loyalty or admiration to ensure patient safety. Conversely, Caleb Powell’s approach to reducing readmissions must balance ethical imperatives of beneficence and non-maleficence—acting in ways that promote patient well-being without causing harm or undue restriction of access to care (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013).

Application of Ethical Decision-Making Model in Public Health and Clinical Practice

The third case study of vaccination ethics further illustrates the importance of each step. Nurse Emily’s reflection on visualizing the effects of preventable diseases employs moral awareness, recognizing the need for effective communication and public education about vaccines. Parents’ refusal to vaccinate, influenced by misinformation, relies on moral judgment rooted in fear, misinformation, and cultural beliefs. Healthcare providers, like Piper and Nasra, then face the challenge of implementing ethical behavior—respecting parental autonomy while safeguarding public health. Utilizing the ethical decision-making model enables practitioners to navigate these complex interactions ethically and effectively (World Health Organization, 2019).

Conclusion

The ethical decision-making model outlined—moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior—serves as a useful framework for healthcare professionals facing complex dilemmas. Recognizing the intricacies of personal, organizational, and cultural variables influences how dilemmas are perceived and addressed. The case studies demonstrate that ethical decision-making is seldom straightforward; it requires careful reflection, balanced judgment, and courageous action to uphold professional integrity and prioritize patient welfare. Implementing this model systematically can promote ethical consistency and foster a culture of moral responsibility within healthcare settings.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2007). Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do It Right. Wiley.
• World Health Organization. (2019). Vaccination and trust: How to deal with vaccine hesitancy. WHO.
• Resnik, D. B. (2018). Caring for Patients in Research Ethics. Routledge.
• Gillon, R. (1994). Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ, 309(6948), 184–188.
• Childress, J. F., & Siegler, M. (2014). Ethical dilemmas in healthcare. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(6), 351–353.
• Fitzgerald, R. et al. (2017). Teaching ethical decision-making in healthcare. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43(10), 706–711.
• Hoffman, S. J., & Jamison, D. (2015). The ethics of health profession regulation. Medical Teacher, 37(4), 395–397.
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The Sage Handbook of Action Research. Sage Publications.
• Miller, F. G., & Emanuel, E. J. (2008). The ethics of clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(21), 2315–2322.