Ethical Dilemma: Cambridge College Amazon Is One Of The Larg

Ethical Dilemma Cambridge College Amazon is one of the largest e-commerce companies across the world. The company has been in existence over the years, and they have made great progress. They managed to secure a larger market gap, and they have established roots all over the world. The company started as an e-book to one of the largest online sellers across the world. Amazon has always come up with the best strategies that have enabled them to be on top of the list and offered the best services and products.

Amazon, as a global leader in e-commerce, faces a multitude of ethical dilemmas that threaten its reputation and operational sustainability. These dilemmas revolve primarily around two core issues: tax minimization strategies and the treatment of employees. Both issues present complex conflicts between profit maximization, legal compliance, social responsibility, and ethical conduct, necessitating a nuanced examination through the lens of ethical theory and corporate social responsibility (CSR).

One of the most prominent ethical issues facing Amazon is its tax practices. Philosophically, this issue relates to the principles of fairness and corporate social responsibility. Legally, Amazon adheres to the basic requirements of tax law; however, its aggressive tax planning strategies—such as profit shifting and exploiting legal loopholes—raise questions about fairness and moral responsibility. From an ethical perspective, this practice can be viewed as a form of tax avoidance that deprives governments of revenue needed for public services, which is a violation of social contract theory. This strategy benefits shareholders and executives at the expense of societal well-being and the common good, creating a significant moral dilemma for the company.

Applying utilitarian principles, one could argue that minimizing tax liabilities might increase overall shareholder value and corporate profitability, but at the broader societal level, it undermines the social fabric and public trust. Conversely, deontological ethics would suggest that corporations hold a moral obligation to contribute fairly to the societies in which they operate, regardless of legal loopholes. Amazon’s decision to minimize taxes, while legal, could be considered ethically questionable as it violates the principle of fairness and the moral obligation to support the societal infrastructure that enables its success.

The second challenge concerns employee treatment. Amazon's reputation has been marred by allegations of poor working conditions, low wages, and insufficient benefits. From an ethical standpoint, this issue relates to the principles of justice, respect for persons, and employee rights. The company's fast-paced fulfillment centers require employees to meet demanding targets under sometimes hazardous conditions, raising questions about whether the company respects the dignity and well-being of its workers.

Using Kantian ethics, one could argue that treating workers poorly violates the moral duty to respect persons as ends in themselves, not merely as means to profit. Similarly, social responsibility emphasizes fairness and justice, advocating for equitable treatment and decent wages. Neglecting employee welfare undermines CSR principles, which hold that corporations should operate ethically by balancing profit motives with responsibilities toward stakeholders, including employees.

Addressing these dilemmas requires a proactive approach rooted in ethical theory and CSR. Amazon could adopt an integrative framework that emphasizes transparency in tax practices and a commitment to fair wages and working conditions. For example, the company might implement a more equitable profit-sharing model, ensure proper safety measures are in place, and publicly report its tax contributions, fostering trust and accountability.

Furthermore, embracing corporate social responsibility means actively engaging stakeholders—employees, customers, governments, and communities—in decision-making processes. For instance, adopting a stakeholder theory approach could help Amazon align its business practices with societal expectations and ethical standards. This approach emphasizes that long-term success depends not only on shareholder gains but also on the well-being of all stakeholders.

To reconcile its pursuit of profit with ethical conduct, Amazon could also leverage the concept of shared value, wherein business strategies are designed to create economic value while simultaneously addressing societal issues. Initiatives such as fair labor practices, community engagement, and responsible tax contributions would bolster its reputation and ensure sustainable growth.

In conclusion, Amazon’s ethical dilemmas surrounding tax strategies and employee treatment highlight the tension between profit motives and moral responsibilities. By adopting comprehensive CSR strategies that promote transparency, fairness, and stakeholder engagement, Amazon can mitigate these ethical issues while strengthening its market position. Ultimately, embracing an ethical corporate culture rooted in accountability and social responsibility is essential for the company's long-term sustainability and societal trust.

References

• Bower, J. L., & Paine, L. S. (2017). The error at the heart of corporate leadership. Harvard Business Review, 95(3), 165-174.
• Davis, A. K., Guenther, D. A., Krull, L. K., & Williams, B. M. (2016). Do socially responsible firms pay more taxes? The Accounting Review, 91(1), 47-68.
• Ezrachi, A., & Stucke, M. E. (2017). Emerging antitrust threats and enforcement actions in the online world. Competition Law International, 13, 125-139.
• Favre, E. (2007). Online auction houses: how trademark owners protect brand integrity against counterfeiting. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2(11), 767–776.
• Fisher, J. M. (2014). Fairer shores: Tax havens, tax avoidance, and corporate social responsibility. Business Law Review, 94, 337–348.
• Goel, P., Verma, P., Al Mutairi, Q., Bhardwaj, R., & Tyagi, S. (2020). Customer experiences, expectations, and satisfaction level towards services provided by Amazon. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality in the Asia Pacific, 3(1), 89-101.
• Reddy, B. S. (2017). Evolution, growth, and challenges in the e-commerce industry: a case of India. IHistas: The Journal of Indian Management, 7(2), 43-50.
• Schlosser, R., Boissier, M., Schober, A., & Uflacker, M. (2016). How to survive dynamic pricing competition in e-commerce. RecSys Posters Collection.
• Amazon. (2020). About Amazon. Retrieved from https://www.aboutamazon.com
• United Nations Global Compact. (2019). Business and human rights: Corporate social responsibility and ethical practices. United Nations.