Ethical Dilemmas In A 1050 To 1400 Word Or 3 To 4 Page Paper

Ethical Dilemmasin A 1050 To 1400 Word Or 3 To 4 Page Paper Exp

In a 1,050- to 1,400-word (or 3- to 4-page) paper, explain what you would do if you found an unethical practice in your workplace. Would it depend on the severity of the unethical practice? Provide a couple of examples of potential unethical practices in your organization that could be considered very minor that people have come to “accept” as opposed to reporting. Justify why you think that people tend to accept some unethical practices while others are not accepted. Create a continuum of severity model regarding ethical practices in organizations and discuss your model. How did you arrive at the model you created?

Paper For Above instruction

Addressing unethical practices within the workplace presents a complex challenge that demands a nuanced understanding of ethical standards, individual responsibility, and organizational culture. When confronted with unethical behavior, my response would be guided primarily by the severity of the practice, the potential impact on stakeholders, and the organizational policies in place. In this paper, I will explore my appropriate course of action, examine examples of minor unethical practices that tend to be normalized, justify the reasons behind such normalization, and propose a continuum of severity model to categorize ethical breaches in organizations.

Regarding my response to unethical practices, I believe that the response should be proportionate to the severity of the misconduct. For minor infractions, I might initially consider addressing the issue informally, perhaps through a private conversation with the involved individual or team, emphasizing awareness and encouraging ethical behavior. This approach promotes a culture of openness without escalating the situation unnecessarily. However, if the unethical practice is more serious—such as fraud, harassment, or violation of legal regulations—I would follow formal reporting procedures, involve higher management, or alert the relevant compliance authorities. The core principle remains: the ethical obligation to prevent harm and uphold integrity supersedes tolerance for misconduct.

Unethical practices that are perceived as minor often become widespread and normalized within organizational culture. For instance, a common minor unethical practice is exaggerating one's workload or productivity metrics to appear more efficient, which employees might justify as a harmless embellishment. Another example could be colleagues leaving work early or taking extended breaks without proper authorization, practices often accepted as part of the workplace 'culture' or seen as minor miscues rather than misconduct. Such behaviors tend to be accepted because they are perceived as benign or culturally ingrained habits rather than serious breaches of ethics.

The acceptance of minor unethical practices often stems from several contextual factors. Firstly, there is a tendency to normalize behaviors that do not cause immediate or tangible harm to others, leading individuals to rationalize these actions as trivial or unavoidable. Secondly, organizational culture can implicitly condone or overlook minor infractions if they are not explicitly penalized, fostering a sense of complacency. Thirdly, employees may fear retaliation or social exclusion if they report these behaviors, leading to a bystander effect where unethical practices persist unchallenged. As a result, some unethical behaviors are tolerated because they are perceived as 'small' or inconsequential, even though they contribute to a broader culture of complacency.

To better understand and evaluate the severity of unethical practices, I propose a continuum of severity model that categorizes ethical breaches into levels, from minor infractions to egregious misconduct. At the lowest end of the spectrum are minor infractions—behaviors like minor exaggerations or small time thefts—that often go unnoticed or are normalized. Slightly more severe are unethical practices that could harm organizational reputation or stakeholder trust if uncorrected, such as favoritism or minor conflicts of interest. At the high end of the spectrum are grave violations like fraud, breach of confidentiality, harassment, or illegal activities that have serious consequences and warrant immediate intervention.

The development of this model was influenced by organizational ethics literature, which emphasizes the importance of context, impact, and intent in evaluating misconduct. I considered the severity, likelihood of harm, and the potential for escalation when designing the model. The purpose of this continuum is to foster a more systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and responding to unethical behaviors, ensuring that organizations address issues proportionally and effectively. The model also serves as an educational tool to promote awareness of the varying degrees of ethical breaches and to guide managers and employees in ethical decision-making.

In conclusion, handling unethical practices requires discernment, a clear understanding of organizational values, and adherence to ethical principles. Minor infractions, while seemingly insignificant, can cumulatively erode organizational integrity if left unchecked. Therefore, establishing a severity continuum helps delineate appropriate responses, promotes ethical awareness, and reinforces a culture of accountability. As individuals and organizations strive for integrity, recognizing and addressing the full spectrum of unethical behaviors becomes essential to maintaining trust, compliance, and ethical excellence in the workplace.

References

• Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2019). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2017). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How to Do It Right. Wiley.
• Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Ethical Decision-Making Theory and Research: Highlights, Challenges, and New Directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 775–793.
• Donelson R. Forsyth (2018). Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance. Springer.
• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger Publishers.
• Kidder, R. M. (2005). How Good People Make Tough Choices: Resolving the Dilemmas of Ethical Living. HarperOne.
• Kaptein, M. (2011). Understanding Ethical Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(2), 211–226.
• Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Brothers.
• Ciulla, J. B. (2014). Ethics, the Heart of Leadership. Praeger.