Ethics Assignment In PR: Read Chapter 5, Theoretical ✓ Solved

Ethics Assignment In This is PR read Chapter 5, Theoretical

To complete this assignment, please select a famous person or a company with ethical problems and answer these questions:

  1. What ethical problems are being faced?
  2. What legal issues are involved? Be sure to use the text.
  3. What strategy would you suggest as the PR representative to improve the person’s image?
  4. How would this strategy affect the different publics?
  5. If you were the PR person in this situation, which of your ethics would be helpful and which ones could provide a problem for you?

Remember to demonstrate that you understand and can apply the text material. Write out the questions completely and then answer them. Be sure to support your ideas with outside research. Use the APA method of documentation. This paper should be 7-10 pages minimum.

Paper For Above Instructions

Public relations (PR) plays a significant role in maintaining the reputation of individuals and corporations alike, especially during crises. One prominent case that has drawn considerable ethical scrutiny is the scandal involving the British Petroleum (BP) company during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010. This incident not only resulted in environmental devastation but also brought to light various ethical and legal dilemmas surrounding corporate responsibility. In this paper, the ethical problems faced by BP, the legal issues involved, recommended PR strategies, the potential impacts of those strategies on different publics, and personal ethical considerations will be analyzed.

Ethical Problems Faced by BP

The primary ethical problem faced by BP during the oil spill was its apparent disregard for environmental safety in pursuit of profits. The catastrophic consequences of the spill—resulting in the death of eleven workers, severe marine life destruction, and a lasting impact on the Gulf Coast economy—highlighted fundamental questions about corporate ethics and responsibility. Furthermore, BP faced criticism for its initial attempts to downplay the seriousness of the incident. These actions reflected a broader ethical concern about the transparency and honesty of corporate communications during crises (Friedman et al., 2017).

Legal Issues Involved

Legally, BP encountered multiple lawsuits and regulatory repercussions following the disaster. The company faced charges related to negligence and violations of the Clean Water Act. The U.S. government held BP accountable for the massive oil spill, resulting in billions of dollars in fines and settlements. Additionally, the lack of adequate safety measures and the decision to prioritize profitability over safety protocols raised legal questions about corporate governance and accountability (Sullivan & Natarajan, 2016). The legal outcomes of the scenario not only impacted BP’s financial standing but also emphasized the importance of adherence to regulations in corporate operations.

Recommended PR Strategy

If I were the PR representative for BP during this crisis, I would implement a comprehensive, transparent communication strategy centered around accountability. The key components of this strategy would include:

  • Full disclosure of the extent of the damage caused by the spill and ongoing recovery efforts, including costs, environmental impacts, and worker safety measures.
  • Implementation of community engagement initiatives, such as funding for local businesses affected by the spill and sponsoring community cleanup efforts to restore the environment.
  • Regular updates through various media channels to keep the public informed about progress and new initiatives undertaken by BP.
  • Collaboration with environmental organizations to demonstrate a commitment to ecological restoration and sustainability.

This strategy not only aims to restore BP's public image but also seeks to actively engage stakeholders, reinforcing the idea that the corporation values transparency and community relations.

Impact on Different Publics

The proposed PR strategy would have varied impacts on different publics. For local communities affected by the spill, a commitment to transparency and support initiatives could foster goodwill and rebuild trust. Engaging with local stakeholders, including businesses and environmental organizations, would create a sense of shared ownership and responsibility for recovery efforts. In contrast, investors might be initially wary due to past mismanagement, yet consistent communication and visible efforts toward accountability could help reinforce confidence in BP's long-term commitments (Coombs & Holladay, 2012).

Moreover, the media plays a critical role in shaping public perception. By proactively sharing information and progress reports, BP could mitigate negative press and encourage more balanced reporting. Finally, regulators and governmental bodies would likely respond favorably to BP’s initiatives, potentially easing legal repercussions and paving the way for favorable collaborations in the future.

Ethical Considerations as PR Representative

As a PR professional in this situation, I would draw from principles of honesty, integrity, and respect for all stakeholders. Ethical reasoning in PR emphasizes the importance of truthful communication and accountability, which are especially relevant during a crisis (Vercic et al., 2020). My personal ethics would guide me to advocate for transparency about BP’s environmental impact and the genuine efforts to rectify mistakes.

However, potential challenges could arise from the need to balance corporate interests with public accountability. The pressure to protect the company's image could lead to ethical dilemmas about withholding information or downplaying the severity of ongoing issues. Such conflicts illustrate the importance of ethical self-awareness, as navigating these challenges requires a commitment to ethical principles while also considering practical outcomes for the corporation (Maital & Barak, 2016).

Conclusion

The case of BP during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill serves as a profound example of the ethical and legal complexities inherent in public relations. By properly identifying and addressing ethical issues, employing strategic communication, and adhering to ethical practices, PR professionals can guide organizations through crises while fostering stronger relationships with stakeholders. Overall, embracing transparency, responsibility, and ethical reasoning remains crucial in upholding the integrity and reputation of any organization facing adversity.

References

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2012). A strategic approach to crisis communication. In Strategic Communication in Crisis Management (pp. 1-12). Routledge.
  • Friedman, H. W., Wiggins, S. D., & Tarter, J. C. (2017). Corporate transparency in crises. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(3), 569-585.
  • Maital, S., & Barak, Y. (2016). Ethics in business and management: a practical approach. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(3), 256-266.
  • Sullivan, P., & Natarajan, A. (2016). The legal implications of the Deepwater Horizon spill: The fallout for the oil industry. Environmental Law Reporter, 46(11), 11055-11070.
  • Vercic, D., Ewing, M. T., & Duh, M. H. (2020). Ethical principles in public relations: A global perspective. Public Relations Review, 46(4), 101885.
  • Gray, E. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and PR: strategies for success. Journal of Communication Management, 22(2), 152-167.
  • Chun, R., & Davies, G. (2010). The influence of corporate social responsibility on the corporate brand: A brand equity perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 16(4), 457-470.
  • Smith, M., & Sutherland, M. (2015). Crisis communication and stakeholder engagement: A study of the effectiveness of a corporate response to a crisis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27(3), 233-246.
  • Sandhu, H., & Kaur, J. (2014). Ethics in public relations: A comparison of framework theory with ethical perspectives. Asian Journal of Communication, 24(5), 569-587.
  • Seeger, M. W., & Ulmer, R. R. (2003). Organizational crisis: An extensive literature review. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(4), 277-303.

Related Assignments