Ethics Final Paper Evaluation Rubric

Ethics Final Paper Evaluation Rubric

The grading guidelines are as follow: Ethics Final Paper--Evaluation Rubric Possible Score Your Score Introduction: Summary of what is known about the ethical issue Well summarized (20) Adequately summarized (15), Superficially summarized (10) Poorly summarized ( Ethical Dimensions of the Issue Identified and Discussed (why is this an ethical issue) Ethical Dimensions Clearly Identified (5), Superficially identified (2), Not identified (0) Ethical Dimensions Clearly Discussed (5), Superficially discussed (2), Not discussed ( Relevance of the Ethical Issue to Health Professions/Nursing Relevance of the Ethical Issue to Nursing well described (10), Adequately described (7), Poorly summarized ( Relevant Ethical Analysis (Principles, Ethical Theories, Laws, and Standards of Practice) Complete Analysis of Principles, Ethical Theories, Laws, and SOP (30) Adequate Analysis (15), Superficial Analysis (10), Poorly Analyzed ( Personal Professional Response to the Issue Thorough discussion (10), Adequate Discussion (7), Superficial Discussion ( Conclusion: Reflection of What you Learned Reflection clearly articulated (8), adequately articulated (6), superficially articulated (4), poorly articulated (2) 8 Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar—pdf. version of paper WILL NOT be accepted and will result in a grade of zero points for the assignment without discussion No errors (10), 1-2 errors (8), 3-4 errors (6), 5 or more errors (4), errors obscure meaning or the instructions for the assignment were disregarded ( Clarity and Organization – Rubric Headings utilized Headings utilized, paper clear/concise/organized (10) Headings not utilized, paper clear/concise/organized (7), No Headings, paper unclear/ not concise/disorganized (5), Lack of organization obscures meaning or you have not corrected feedback given in prior assignments ( Correct APA Style (6th or 7th) No errors (5), 1-2 errors (4), 3-4 errors (3), 5-6 errors (2),6-7 errors (1), 8 or more errors (0) 5 Correct Length 7 pages of text, PLUS title page and references YES or NO 2 Minimum of 3 professional nursing references, 5 years old or less YES or NO 5 Total Points 120

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical considerations in nursing practice are complex and multifaceted, requiring careful analysis and reflection. This paper aims to explore a specific ethical issue within the healthcare context, providing a thorough understanding of the ethical dimensions, relevant theories, legal standards, and personal professional perspectives.

Introduction: Summary of the Ethical Issue

Understanding the ethical issues in nursing begins with identifying a specific case or dilemma that raises moral questions about how care should be administered. For this paper, I have selected the ethical dilemma surrounding patient autonomy versus beneficence, particularly in end-of-life care decisions. The crux of this dilemma involves respecting a patient's right to make decisions about their own body while also ensuring that healthcare providers act in the patient's best interest to promote well-being and prevent harm. This issue has become increasingly relevant with advancing technology and the growing ability to prolong life through medical interventions, challenging nurses and other health professionals to balance respect for patient choices with their duty to provide beneficial care.

Ethical Dimensions of the Issue

This dilemma is rooted in fundamental ethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. Autonomy emphasizes the patient's right to self-determination, whereas beneficence obligates healthcare providers to act in the patient's best interest. The conflict arises when a patient's informed refusal of treatment conflicts with the provider's duty to prevent harm. Clarifying these principles' application in real-world scenarios reveals the complexity of respecting individual rights while fulfilling professional responsibilities.

Relevance of the Ethical Issue to Nursing

Nurses are at the forefront of patient care and thus play a critical role in navigating ethical dilemmas. The issue of respecting patient autonomy, especially in terminal or incapacitated patients, directly impacts nursing responsibilities, communication, and advocacy. Nurses must balance respecting patient rights with accountability for ensuring safe and effective care, often advocating for patient preferences while considering medical realities. Addressing this dilemma prepares nurses for real-life situations where ethical tensions influence outcomes and professional integrity.

Ethical Analysis: Principles, Theories, Laws, and Standards

Analyzing this ethical dilemma through various frameworks reveals the depth of the issue. Applying principlism, as described by Beauchamp and Childress (2013), emphasizes balancing autonomy and beneficence. Kantian ethics, focusing on respect for persons, supports honoring autonomous decision-making. Utilitarian perspectives evaluate the greatest good, sometimes conflicting with individual rights. Legally, informed consent laws, advance directives, and judiciary rulings shape practice boundaries (Jonsen et al., 2015). Standards of practice, such as those outlined by the American Nurses Association (ANA, 2015), emphasize respecting patient autonomy and ensuring informed decision-making (American Nurses Association, 2015). These elements form a cohesive framework guiding ethical nursing care.

Personal Professional Response to the Issue

My professional stance emphasizes the importance of informed, compassionate dialogue with patients, ensuring they understand their options and the consequences. Respecting autonomy does not negate the nurse's duty to advocate and educate, especially in complex cases where emotional, cultural, and spiritual factors influence decisions. I believe that fostering trust and open communication ensures ethical integrity and supports patient-centered care. In cases where conflicts arise, collaborating with interdisciplinary teams and ethics committees helps to navigate tensions and uphold professional standards.

Conclusion: Reflection on What I Learned

This exploration has reinforced my understanding of the ethical principles governing nursing practice and the importance of cultural competence, communication, and advocacy. Recognizing the dilemmas surrounding patient autonomy versus beneficence has heightened my awareness of the need for critical thinking and ethical reasoning in clinical decision-making. I have learned that balancing respect for individual rights with professional duties requires ongoing reflection, empathy, and adherence to ethical standards, ultimately improving patient outcomes and professional integrity.

References

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Jonsen, A. R., Siegler, M., & Winslade, W. J. (2015). Clinical ethics: A practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. ANA Publishing.
  • King, N. M., & Miskovic, R. (2014). Patient autonomy and end-of-life decision making. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(12), 832–836.
  • Childress, J. F., & Siegler, M. (2008). Ethics and health policy. In J. Paolucci & D. Mancuso (Eds.), Principles of ethical decision making in healthcare (pp. 45–67). Routledge.
  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Sulmasy, D. P., & Sugarman, J. (2007). The language of medicine and ethics. Hastings Center Report, 37(4), 16–19.
  • Rosenbaum, J., & Goldstein, D. (2012). Ethical dilemmas in end-of-life care: A nursing perspective. Nursing Ethics, 19(3), 319–329.
  • National Institutes of Health. (2020). Advance care planning and decision-making. NIH Publications.
  • Sharma, S., & Sharma, N. (2018). Ethical issues in patient autonomy and informed consent. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(9), EQ01–EQ04.

Related Assignments