Euthanasia & Physician-Assisted Suicide Due 11/15/2020 ✓ Solved

Euthanasia & Physician-Assisted Suicide Due 11/15/2020

Topic: Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide

Instructions: This assignment is the first step in a three-part project. Each step will build on earlier steps. First, select a topic of moral controversy, debate, disagreement, and dispute.

My Topic: Euthanasia & Physician-Assisted Suicide

Detail the positions of each side of the ethical debate. Note at least two moral reasons each side presents to show their view on the topic is correct. Evaluate these positions using the moral theories studied this week:

  • What would an Ethical Egoist say about this topic? What side would the Ethical Egoist take? What would the Ethical Egoist say to justify their moral position?
  • Is there a conflict between loyalty to self and to community relevant to your topic? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
  • What would a Social Contract Ethicist say about this topic? What side would the Social Contract Ethicist take? What would the Social Contract Ethicist say to justify their moral position?
  • Does your topic involve a collision between personal obligations and national ones? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.

Finally, reference and discuss any professional code of ethics relevant to your topic such as the AMA code for doctors, the ANA code for nurses, or any other pertinent professional code. State whether and how your chosen topic involves any conflicts between professional and familial duties.

Paper For Above Instructions

Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide remain contentious topics in ethical discussions, invoking strong opinions on both sides. Broadly defined, euthanasia refers to the act of intentionally ending a person's life to relieve suffering, while physician-assisted suicide allows individuals to take their own lives with the assistance of a medical professional. At the heart of these debates lie deeply held moral beliefs that challenge societal norms and professional ethics.

Positions in the Ethical Debate

Proponents of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide often argue from a standpoint of autonomy and compassion. They contend that individuals should have the right to determine the course of their own lives, particularly in cases of terminal illness where suffering is unbearable (Quill, 1991). For instance, the argument for autonomy posits that every individual possesses the right to make decisions about their body and life, including the choice to end it if suffering becomes intolerable. Furthermore, compassion forms a critical aspect of this debate; supporters believe that allowing a person to choose death in the face of unbearable pain is a humane act that demonstrates empathy towards individuals enduring extreme and unrelievable suffering (Baker, 2015).

On the contrary, opponents argue that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide devalue human life and could lead to potential abuses. They highlight the moral implications of taking a life, emphasizing the sanctity of life principle, which asserts that life is inherently valuable and should be preserved (Keown, 2018). Additionally, there is a concern about slippery slope arguments, where legalizing euthanasia could lead to a broader acceptance of ending lives for those suffering from psychological struggles or other non-terminal conditions. That said, the arguments frequently revolve around protecting vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and disabled, who may feel coerced into choosing death over life due to societal pressures or financial constraints (Sulmasy et al., 2018).

Evaluation through Moral Theories

Examining the issue from an Ethical Egoist perspective provides insight into the motivations behind personal choice in euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. An Ethical Egoist would advocate for the right of individuals to prioritize their own well-being and desires above societal norms or expectations (Rachels, 1997). Therefore, an Ethical Egoist may support euthanasia if the individual perceives that such an action is beneficial to themselves, ultimately fostering a belief that personal happiness should take precedence. In such a scenario, any conflict between self-loyalty and community values could challenge societal beliefs but serve an individual's needs. A best course of action as per Ethical Egoism would be to support those individuals seeking relief through euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, as it aligns with their personal interests (Bennett, 2019).

On the contrary, a Social Contract Ethicist would approach this issue by focusing on the agreements and responsibilities established within a community. They may argue that both euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide violate the implied contract that protects life and the collective well-being of the society. From this perspective, social contract theory could advocate opposing these practices, suggesting that the potential dangers and consequences they herald for society, including the erosion of the value placed on life, outweigh individual desires (Gert et al., 2006). Social contract theorists may perceive a clash between personal obligations to seek self-determination and broader national ethics that strive to preserve life at all costs.

Professional Codes of Ethics

The ethical considerations surrounding euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are also heavily influenced by professional codes of ethics. For instance, the American Medical Association (AMA) emphasizes the importance of preserving life and the necessity of upholding the physician's role as a healer (American Medical Association, 2020). Similarly, the American Nurses Association (ANA) highlights the principle of non-maleficence, advocating for patient safety and welfare, which complicates the endorsement of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (American Nurses Association, 2015). Such codes promote values that prioritize life preservation, but they may also invoke dilemmas for healthcare professionals, particularly when respecting patient autonomy interfaces with their professional responsibilities.

This topic also generates conflicts between professional duties and familial responsibilities. For medical professionals, the advocacy for life-preserving treatments can conflict with the wishes of patients and their families, especially when the latter expresses a desire for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (Cayton et al., 2020). Thus, professionals are often situated in ethically challenging positions where they must balance their duties to physicians, patients, and families, leading to heightened moral complexity.

Conclusion

In summary, the discussion surrounding euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide encompasses deeply held beliefs and varying interpretations of ethical frameworks. Understanding the diverse positions provokes critical thinking on individual autonomy, societal values, and professional ethics, ultimately enriching the ongoing dialogue surrounding this complex moral issue.

References

  • American Medical Association. (2020). Opinion 5.3 - Physician-Assisted Suicide. AMA Journal of Ethics, 22(10), E844-847.
  • American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretative Statements. Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org/our-certifications/ana-code-of-ethics-for-nurses/.
  • Baker, R. (2015). Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: A critical review. Journal of Law and Medicine, 23(1), 44-59.
  • Bennett, R. (2019). Ethical Egoism and Patient Autonomy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(5), 339-344.
  • Cayton, M., Wirls, L., & Pomeroy, E. (2020). The conflicts of duty: Professional ethics in the era of assisted dying. The New Bioethics, 26(4), 263-275.
  • Gert, B., Culver, C., & Clouser, K. D. (2006). Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. Oxford University Press.
  • Keown, J. (2018). Euthanasia, ethics and public policy: Analyzing the arguments for and against. The Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(12), 828-832.
  • Quill, T. E. (1991). Death and dignity: A prescription for euthanasia. New England Journal of Medicine, 324(10), 691-694.
  • Rachels, J. (1997). Ethical Egoism. In J. Rachels, The Elements of Moral Philosophy (pp. 25-30). McGraw-Hill.
  • Sulmasy, D. P., et al. (2018). The Challenge of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in Contemporary Medicine. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 21(10), 1272-1277.

Related Assignments