Evaluate A Current Organizational Structure And Recommendati

Evaluate a current organizational structure and recommend s

Evaluate a current organizational structure and recommend structural changes that can help address concerns related to collaboration, communication, and autonomy. Provide a new organizational structure chart and a written explanation of your recommended changes, including how they will impact organizational communication and team dynamics. Create the updated chart and write a 2-3 page paper explaining your recommendations and the anticipated effects on communication and teamwork.

Paper For Above instruction

This paper aims to evaluate the current organizational structure of a company that has traditionally been highly formalized with broad spans of control and adherence to strict rules and regulations. The organization is undergoing a transition toward less formal, more flexible structures intended to foster creativity, innovation, and greater autonomy among employees. However, this shift has revealed several issues, including managerial overwhelm, employee under-support, and communication breakdowns that lead to duplicated efforts and lack of updated information.

In its original state, the organizational structure was hierarchical, with clear lines of authority and functional divisions. Managers were responsible for multiple departments, relying heavily on standard operating procedures to oversee tasks. While this setup allowed for control and consistency, it limited employee talent utilization and did not promote a strong team culture. As the organization evolves toward decentralization and increased autonomy, the need for better communication pathways and supporting structures becomes evident.

To address these concerns, I recommend a new organizational structure emphasizing decentralization with dedicated communication channels, cross-functional teams, and a flatter hierarchy to facilitate better collaboration and information sharing. The proposed structure involves creating semi-autonomous teams aligned with specific functions or projects, each led by a team leader who reports to a central operations manager. This setup allows managers to focus on oversight rather than micromanagement while empowering team leaders to manage day-to-day operations.

The new structure would include an organizational chart with clear reporting lines, showing a reduction in the number of direct reports per manager, and establishing liaison roles responsible for communication between teams. Additionally, integrating regular cross-team meetings and shared digital communication platforms, such as Slack or Microsoft Teams, will improve real-time information flow and reduce duplicated work.

In terms of communication, this structure promotes transparency and timely updates. Team leaders act as connectors, ensuring their team members are aligned with organizational goals and current projects. This streamlined communication reduces misunderstandings and ensures that everyone has access to pertinent information, ultimately improving decision-making and productivity.

Team dynamics will benefit from increased autonomy and clearer roles. Employees will feel more supported and engaged when they work within well-defined teams with direct support from team leaders. The flatter hierarchy promotes increased collaboration, innovation, and a shared sense of responsibility. It also encourages a culture where employees are motivated to contribute ideas, knowing that their inputs are valued and impactful.

In conclusion, transitioning to a more flexible, team-oriented structure supported by effective communication channels addresses existing challenges of managerial overload, communication breakdowns, and employee under-support. These changes foster a more collaborative work environment that enhances organizational agility, improves communication, and promotes a positive team culture vital for ongoing innovation and success.

References

• Daft, R. L. (2018). Organization theory and design (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall.
• Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2018). Management (14th ed.). Pearson.
• Byars, L. L., & Rue, L. W. (2013). Management skills for everyday life. Routledge.
• Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations: Strategy, structure, and process at the business unit and enterprise levels. John Wiley & Sons.
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2005). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, 83(7/8), 162-171.
• Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization development: A research-based approach to change (4th ed.). Springer.
• Hage, J. (2005). Organizations: A Systems Approach. Wiley.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.