Evaluate A Specific Business Process Based On Criteria Detai
Evaluate a specific business process based on criteria detailed below
This assignment requires you to evaluate a specific business process by identifying its stakeholders, setting performance metrics, and proposing quick wins to improve the process. You need to select a process with a clear beginning and end, involving specific steps, and understand its strategic importance within the organization. The process should be relevant to the company's objectives, like customer service, billing, or network maintenance.
If you already have a process in mind, continue with that; if not, choose one related to Safaricom Limited, a major telecommunications provider in Nairobi, Kenya, serving approximately 12 million mobile subscribers. For instance, you might evaluate the process of network outage management, customer onboarding, or billing cycles.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
Safaricom Limited, a leading telecommunications company in Kenya, plays a pivotal role in connecting millions through its mobile network services. Given its extensive subscriber base of approximately 12 million users, the company's operational efficiency significantly impacts customer satisfaction, revenue, and competitive positioning. This paper aims to evaluate a specific business process within Safaricom—namely, the customer onboarding process—to identify stakeholders, establish performance metrics, and propose quick wins to enhance efficiency.
Part 1: Stakeholders
In analyzing the customer onboarding process at Safaricom, several stakeholders beyond those directly involved in executing the process are identified. First, the Marketing Department is a crucial stakeholder as they develop promotional campaigns and communicate service offerings to potential customers. Their relationship with the onboarding process involves generating leads and ensuring a smooth transition from marketing to activation, with an expectation to convert prospects into active users efficiently.
Second, the Regulatory Authorities in Kenya oversee compliance with telecommunications legislation and safeguard consumer rights. They are stakeholders because they regulate data privacy, licensing, and customer verification processes. Their expectations include ensuring that Safaricom adheres to legal requirements, thereby maintaining compliance and avoiding penalties.
The process aims to efficiently register new customers, verify their identities, and activate services with minimal delays while ensuring compliance and customer satisfaction. Success in this process is defined by quick activation times, high accuracy in customer verification, and positive customer experiences, ultimately leading to increased subscriptions and loyalty.
Part 2: Metrics
1. Average Activation Time
- Definition: The average time taken from customer registration to service activation, measured in hours or minutes.
- Significance: This metric assesses process efficiency by indicating how quickly customers can start using services after signing up.
- Example: On average, new customers are activated within 4 hours.
2. Verification Accuracy Rate
- Definition: The percentage of customer verifications successfully completed without errors or re-verification.
- Significance: Ensures process reliability and reduces delays caused by incorrect or incomplete verification, directly influencing customer satisfaction.
- Example: A 98% verification accuracy rate indicates high reliability in customer documentation checks.
3. Customer Satisfaction Score
- Definition: Measured via surveys, reflecting customers’ overall satisfaction with the onboarding experience on a scale of 1 to 10.
- Significance: This metric gauges customer perception and helps identify areas for improvement in the onboarding process.
- Example: An average satisfaction score of 8.5 indicates a generally positive onboarding experience.
Part 3: Quick Wins
Quick Win 1: Automating Customer Verification
This involves implementing automated verification tools, such as biometric checks or digital document verification, reducing manual verification time. It can be accomplished swiftly by integrating existing technology platforms with minimal process redesign. This quick win will significantly decrease verification errors and speed up activation times, directly impacting overall process efficiency and customer satisfaction.
Quick Win 2: Streamlining Documentation Collection
This initiative involves simplifying the documentation requirements and providing self-service options for customers through mobile apps or website portals. Rapid implementation can be achieved by updating digital interfaces to accept digital copies or e-signatures. This will streamline onboarding, reduce paperwork delays, and improve the customer experience by making the process more accessible and less cumbersome.
References
- Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
- Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Others Don't. HarperBusiness.
- Garvin, D. A. (1984). What Does "Product Quality" Really Mean? Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 25-43.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard—Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
- Kay, J. (1993). Foundations of Corporate Success: How Business Strategies Add Value. Oxford University Press.
- Leung, T., & Yu, P. (2004). Customer Relationship Management: A Framework for Retail Banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22(7), 480-497.
- Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
- Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
- Wang, Y., & Patton, D. (2000). Customer Relationship Management in Practice. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 7(1), 25-34.
- Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2007). How Knowledge Affects Radical Innovation: Knowledge Base, Market Knowledge, and Conceptual Knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 4-14.