Evaluate And Revise Ethical Issues In Visual Media Co 699854

Evaluate and Revise Ethical Issues in Visual Media Communica

Evaluate and revise ethical issues in visual media communication to improve awareness of social perceptions. Scenario: You are the campaign manager for a well-known environmental outreach organization. The current campaign is to bring awareness to the organization's Ohio River Clean-Up Project. As the manager, one of your tasks is to review all content and visuals used by the campaign. You actively evaluate and revise any ethical issues that may be detrimental to the project, your organization, or society in general. As you meet with one of the campaign designers, you identify several ethical problems with the new poster he has created. His poster includes the following elements: The poster image shows a group of poor, urban, African-American children playing alongside the Ohio River. The poster text states: "Let's help them clean up." The poster has several overlaid images in the corner of a few celebrities, which gives the impression of celebrity endorsement. There are no sources acknowledged anywhere on the poster. The poster has been digitally altered to make the African-American children appear thinner, darker, and dirtier. Since you are flying out to a campaign meeting in one hour, you ask this campaign designer to hold this poster and wait for your review. You plan to take time tomorrow to create analyze the flyer. In your paper, instruct this designer how to correct several ethical visual issues. You realize you will not only have to identify the ethical visual issues and explain how to revise and change them, but you will also need to clearly describe to him the effect these unethical media issues will have on society. The paper should be about 1-2 pages long.

Paper For Above instruction

In developing an effective and ethically responsible visual media campaign, it is essential to critically evaluate and revise any problematic elements that could perpetuate stereotypes, mislead viewers, or damage societal perceptions. The concerns identified in the as-yet-unrevised poster for the Ohio River Clean-Up Project underline issues of racial stereotyping, misrepresentation, and potential exploitation that require immediate correction.

Firstly, the depiction of the children in the poster warrants significant revision. The portrayal of African-American children as "poor, urban," and further digitally altered to appear thinner, darker, and dirtier perpetuates harmful stereotypes that associate urban poverty and marginalized racial groups with negative attributes. Such imagery reinforces societal biases that portray African-American communities as inherently dirty or less deserving of dignity, which can foster prejudice and social division. To correct this, the poster should feature authentic, respectful images of the children that respect their dignity and represent them in a positive light. These images should be unedited and depict the children engaged in community activities, emphasizing resilience and hope rather than stereotypes.

Secondly, the digital alterations to the children’s appearance are ethically unacceptable. Manipulating images to alter racial features and body image distorts reality and can perpetuate body image issues and racial stereotypes. Image editing should be limited to basic corrections such as lighting or color balance, which do not distort the subjects' identities or perpetuate harmful stereotypes. Removing these alterations will present a truthful and respectful depiction that enhances the campaign’s credibility.

Additionally, the message on the poster, "Let's help them clean up," although well-intentioned, can be perceived as paternalistic. It implies that the children require saving or assistance solely because of their poverty or race. A better approach would be to focus on community collaboration and collective responsibility, with language such as "Join us in cleaning up the Ohio River to protect our communities," fostering a sense of shared effort that respects the agency of all community members.

The overlaid celebrity images must also be reconsidered. If these celebrities did not explicitly endorse the campaign or if their images are used without permission or acknowledgment, their inclusion can be misleading and legally problematic. They should be either removed or accompanied by clear sources and permissions, to avoid misleading viewers about endorsements and to respect copyright laws.

Furthermore, the absence of sources or acknowledgments on the poster diminishes its credibility. Transparency about the data, images, and endorsements used in the campaign is critical to maintaining trust and ensuring ethical integrity. All visual and textual content should be properly credited to avoid misinformation and uphold journalistic standards.

In sum, rectifying these visual ethical issues—by presenting authentic images, avoiding harmful digital alterations, rephrasing paternalistic messages, ensuring proper permissions for celebrities, and providing transparent sources—would greatly enhance the social and ethical impact of the campaign. These revisions help prevent the perpetuation of stereotypes, foster cultural respect, and promote societal understanding. Ethical visual communication is vital to creating campaigns that inform, inspire, and respect all members of society, ultimately contributing to a more inclusive and socially responsible media landscape.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
• Bulger, M. E., & Heitger, D. L. (2009). Advertising and Society Review, 10(1), 1-12.
• Chalfin, D. (2018). Visual Ethics in Media. Media Ethics, 5(2), 45-59.
• Dobbie, A. (2019). Digital Alterations and Ethical Standards in Advertising. Journal of Media Ethics, 34(3), 150-164.
• Gray, J., & Wilkins, L. (2014). Ethical Issues in Visual Communication. Routledge.
• Kellner, D. (2015). Media and Cultural Studies. Routledge.
• Lindsay, P. (2020). Ethical Visual Representation. Journal of Visual Culture, 19(1), 89-104.
• Reed, E. (2017). Social Stereotypes and Media Imagery. Media & Society, 20(4), 512-526.
• Thompson, K. (2016). Photo Editing and Morality. Journalism Ethics, 7(2), 33-46.
• Williams, R. (2018). Media Ethics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan.