Evaluate The Effectiveness Of A Nursing Practice Change Prop

Evaluate the effectiveness of a nursing practice change proposal and develop a plan

Describe one internal and one external method for the dissemination of your evidence-based change proposal. For example, an internal method may be the hospital board, and an external method may be a professional nursing organization. Discuss why it is important to report your change proposal to both of these groups. How will your communication strategies change for each group?

In order to evaluate whether your project made a difference in practice, discuss one way you will be able to evaluate the effectiveness of your intervention. Develop a process to evaluate the intervention if it were implemented and write a word summary of the evaluation plan that will be used to evaluate your intervention.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective dissemination and evaluation are critical components in the successful implementation and sustainability of nursing practice change proposals. Dissemination ensures that evidence-based practices reach key stakeholders who can facilitate widespread adoption and integration into routine care. Evaluation confirms whether the intervention produces the desired outcomes, providing evidence to sustain or modify the practice as needed.

An internal method of dissemination involves engaging with the hospital’s leadership and stakeholder groups such as the hospital board and nursing leadership councils. Presenting evidence-based proposals during staff meetings or via internal memos allows direct communication with decision-makers who influence policy changes, resource allocation, and practice standards within the organization (Zhu et al., 2018). For example, utilizing formal presentations, dashboards with clinical data, or tailored memos can effectively communicate the significance and implications of the change proposal. This internal approach fosters a culture of continuous quality improvement and ensures that the practice change aligns with organizational goals.

Externally, engaging with professional organizations such as the American Nurses Association (ANA) or specialty nursing associations offers a broader platform for dissemination. External dissemination can occur through conferences, webinars, published articles, or organizational websites (Astroth & Hain, 2019). These channels provide access to a wider nursing audience, including clinicians, educators, and policymakers outside the organization. Leveraging external platforms not only raises awareness of the intervention but also promotes standardization of best practices across institutions. Collaboration with professional organizations adds credibility and supports evidence-based advocacy beyond the immediate clinical setting.

Communication strategies must be tailored to each audience to maximize understanding and engagement. For internal groups such as hospital leadership and staff, strategies include concise data-driven presentations, detailed reports, and direct discussions emphasizing how the practice change impacts patient outcomes and operational efficiency. Interactive sessions like question-and-answer rounds or team huddles can facilitate feedback and foster buy-in (Zaman et al., 2018). Employing visual aids such as graphs and dashboards can clarify the impact metrics of the intervention.

Conversely, external communication should emphasize scholarly evidence, alignment with national guidelines, and broader implications for patient safety and quality improvement. Formal presentations at conferences, peer-reviewed journal submissions, and informational brochures on organizational websites serve as credible channels. The language used should be professional and evidence-oriented, designed to influence policy and practice beyond the organization (Gardner et al., 2016). Utilizing storytelling or personal testimonies may also engage external stakeholders and illustrate the real-world significance of the practice change.

Assessment of the intervention’s effectiveness involves specific, measurable indicators aligned with the project's goals. For example, if the goal is to reduce incidence of unplanned hypothermia through normothermic intravenous fluids, outcome metrics could include the percentage change in IVF usage from warmers, patient core temperature stability, and rates of hypothermia-related complications (Zaman et al., 2018). Data collection might be facilitated through electronic health records and supply chain reports.

A systematic process of evaluation includes collecting baseline data before implementation, followed by post-intervention data at predefined intervals. Statistical analysis of the metrics determines whether observed changes are significant and attributable to the intervention. Regular audits, staff feedback, and patient satisfaction surveys add qualitative insights into practice changes and patient perceptions. Incorporating these data into a comprehensive evaluation report enables ongoing quality improvement and guides decisions about sustaining or modifying the practice.

In this framework, a small-scale pilot or phased implementation may be beneficial initially. Feedback from frontline staff and patients can inform adjustments to enhance effectiveness and feasibility. Continuous monitoring and iterative improvement cycles ensure the practice remains aligned with evidence and organizational priorities, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and enhanced quality of care.

References

  • Astroth, K. S., & Hain, D. (2019). Disseminating scholarly work through nursing presentations. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 46(5), 545.
  • Gardner, A., Lahoz, M. R., Bond, I., & Levin, L. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of an evidence-based practice pharmacology course using the Fresno Test. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(7), 123.
  • Zaman, S. S., Rahmani, F., Majedi, M. A., Roshani, D., & Valiee, S. (2018). A clinical trial of the effect of warm intravenous fluids on core temperature and shivering in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 33(5), 616–625.
  • Zhu, W., Xing, W., Hu, Y., Zhou, Y., & Gu, Y. (2018). Improving evidence dissemination and accessibility through a mobile-based resource platform. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(7), 118.
  • American Nurses Association. (2022). Health and safety. Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/clinical-practice/
  • Microsoft. (2022). Create a poll in Teams. Retrieved from https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams
  • Novins, D. K., Green, A. E., Legha, R. K., & Aarons, G. A. (2013). Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices for child and adolescent mental health: a systematic review. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(10), 1009–1025.e18.
  • Gardner, A., Lahoz, M. R., Bond, I., & Levin, L. (2016). Assessing the Effectiveness of an Evidence-based Practice Pharmacology Course Using the Fresno Test. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(7), 123.
  • Astroth, K. S., & Hain, D. (2019). Disseminating Scholarly Work through Nursing Presentations. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 46(5), 545.

Related Assignments