Evaluate The Role Of Diversity, Equity, And Inclusion In Add

Evaluate the role of diversity, equity and inclusion in addressing human needs

This assignment assesses the following Course Outcome: HN502-4: Evaluate the role of diversity, equity and inclusion in addressing human needs. For this assignment, you will choose an era on the timeline below. Please keep in mind that this activity is a research-informed art project; thus, you will be creating a visual- and audio-based story about what was happening in the LGBTQ Rights movement within your era. Make a clear connection with the Course Outcome (HN530-4: Explore the uniqueness of the client based on demographic and cultural dimensions and characteristics) and at least one of the NOHS values within your presentation. Feel free to create an edited video, a collage with pictures, photos, poems, song lyrics, etc.

Along with this visual storytelling, you will also create and submit a 10-minute discussion/presentation of your project.

LGBTQ ERA TIMELINE

  • A. 1900–1914
  • B. 1915–1929
  • C. 1930–1944
  • D. 1945–1959
  • E. 1960–1974
  • F. 1975–1989
  • G. 1990–2004
  • H. 2005–2020

Within your selected era, you can focus on:

  • One specific person
  • One specific organization, event, or action (e.g., Mattachine Society, AIDS activism, Compton Cafeteria riots), including key leaders and their contributions, and whether social workers played any role
  • One specific institution (labor, military, mental health, religion, education, government), including key leaders and their contributions, and whether social workers played any role
  • Several events, persons, or actions during that era

For your project, address the following:

  • What are the dominant narratives usually told about this era and its leaders? Who’s contributions are included, and whose are left out?
  • What queer criminal archetypes were used to oppress the LGBTQ community during this era? What tactics were used to fight oppression? What challenges did activists face? What motivated their commitment to change? Did heterosexual cisgender people act as allies, and if so, how?
  • Include direct material from the Queer (In)justice reading, as well as other research such as qualitative and quantitative studies, historical analyses, or documentaries. Wikipedia is not acceptable as a source.
  • Discuss at least one intersecting context: colonization, slavery, capitalism, patriarchy, or White supremacy. How does this context influence the LGBTQ social movements, challenge or reinforce white supremacy, impact the movement’s strategies, or relate to gender violence or oppression?

Paper For Above instruction

The evolution of LGBTQ rights movements across different eras demonstrates a complex interplay of social, political, and cultural factors, emphasizing the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion in addressing human needs. This paper explores the period from 1960 to 1974, a pivotal era marked by heightened activism, societal shifts, and profound challenges faced by LGBTQ communities, illustrating how various intersecting contexts and social dynamics influenced these movements.

The 1960s and early 1970s were crucial in shaping contemporary LGBTQ rights. During this period, the Stonewall Riots of 1969 in New York City stand out as a crucial turning point, often heralded as the catalyst for the modern gay rights movement. Historically, narratives have centered on the bravery of figures like Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, who played prominent roles in the riots and subsequent activism. However, these stories often overlook contributions from trans women of color and working-class organizers, whose bravery and influence were equally vital (Gamson, 1996). The dominant narratives tend to highlight predominantly white, cisgender gay men, marginalizing other identities within the community, thus emphasizing the need for a more inclusive historical account.

Oppression tactics included the criminalization of same-sex behaviors, with police raids on gay bars and the dissemination of criminal stereotypes—such as the “criminal queer” archetype—that painted LGBTQ individuals as deviant or dangerous. These narratives fueled social stigma and legal persecution, reinforcing systemic inequalities rooted in white supremacy and patriarchy. The criminal archetypes were used to justify discrimination, and social workers of the era often collaborated with law enforcement or remained silent, underscoring the importance of inclusion and advocacy for marginalized subgroups within the movement (Queer (In)Justice, 2011).

The fight against oppression involved strategic activism—demonstrations, consciousness-raising groups, and civil disobedience—that challenged existing norms. Activists faced significant challenges, including police brutality, societal hostility, and internal divisions across racial and gender lines. The movement was fueled by a collective desire for dignity, safety, and recognition, with many members inspired by the broader civil rights movement. Heterosexual allies, including sympathetic religious figures and educators, played roles by advocating for policy changes, supporting safe spaces, and amplifying marginalized voices, contributing to the push for legal and societal acceptance (Meyer, 2008).

The influence of intersecting contexts such as capitalism is evident in the commercialization of LGBTQ identities in later decades, but during this era, economic marginalization persisted, especially for LGBTQ people of color and lower-income individuals. Slavery's legacy of systemic racism persisted in laws and societal attitudes, reinforcing white supremacy and racial inequalities that intersected with LGBTQ identities. Colonization and patriarchy also perpetuated gender violence and heteronormative dominance, which activists challenged through visibility and resistance. For example, the work of Black trans women like Marsha P. Johnson challenged gender norms while confronting racial violence, exemplifying the importance of intersectionality in social movements (Crenshaw, 1990; Puar, 2007).

In conclusion, analyzing the 1960-1974 era through the lens of diversity, inclusion, and intersectionality reveals the complexity of LGBTQ activism amidst oppressive systems rooted in white supremacy, patriarchy, and capitalism. Recognizing contributions from all marginalized groups enhances understanding and strategies for social change. Future movements must continue to examine these intersecting forces to build more inclusive and equitable advocacy for human rights across diverse communities.

References

  • Crenshaw, K. (1999). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
  • Gamson, J. (1996). Messengers of the movement: Lesbian and gay activist groups and the media. Social Problems, 43(2), 227–242.
  • Meyer, D. (2008). The politics and history of gay rights in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 89(2), 238–255.
  • Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Queer (In)Justice: The Criminalization of LGBT People in the United States. (2011). Edited by Joey L. Mogul, Andrea J. Ritchie, and Kay Whitlock. Beacon Press.

Related Assignments