Evaluate The Two Sources Each Classmate Identified And Inclu

Evaluate the two sources each classmate identified and indicate whether you think that the sources would be appropriate for use in an academic assignment

Each of your responses to your classmates should be at least 100 words in length. Evaluate the two sources each classmate identified and indicate whether you think that the sources would be appropriate for use in an academic assignment. Explain your rationale in a way that would help your classmate evaluate his or her own decision-making process about the use of institutional, organizational, and governmental sources.

Paper For Above instruction

This essay critically evaluates the two sources identified by each classmate, focusing on their appropriateness for academic use and the rationale behind the decision. The analysis considers the credibility, relevance, and scholarly value of each source, providing guidance on how to assess institutional, organizational, and governmental references in academic work.

Response to Classmate One

Classmate one selected four sources related to social cognition, including Amodio (2019), Vincini et al. (2017), Keech et al. (2018), and Fernandez-Sotos et al. (2019). These sources are highly appropriate for academic purposes because they are published in peer-reviewed journals such as Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Frontiers in Psychology, Psychoneuroendocrinology, and PLoS One. These journals are reputable and rigorously review submissions for scholarly merit, making these articles credible sources. For example, Amodio’s work provides a current theoretical perspective, while Vincini et al.’s article offers empirical research on neonatal imitation, both contributing valuable insights for academic research. Keech et al.’s meta-analysis on social cognition and neurodevelopmental disorders is also highly credible, as meta-analyses synthesize extensive research data with rigorous methodology. Fernandez-Sotos et al. (2019) provides a systematic review, relevant for understanding interventions, further supporting its academic suitability.

From a rationale perspective, these sources are appropriate because they provide well-substantiated, evidence-based information from recognized scholarly outlets. They contribute to theoretical, empirical, and applied aspects of social cognition, making them reliable references for academic assignments. While these sources are institutional and organizational in nature, their peer-reviewed status and publication in respected journals establish their scholarly integrity. Consequently, these sources align with academic standards for credible references used in coursework, research papers, or scholarly articles.

Response to Classmate Two

Classmate two identified three articles focusing on mental health in children during the COVID-19 pandemic, authored by Fuller (2019), Gold (2016), and Jagannathan (2020). These sources are primarily journalistic articles retrieved from online platforms, such as InformedHealth.org and the Journal of Pediatrics. While these articles are informative and contextualize current issues, their nature as news articles, non-peer-reviewed reports, or popular health websites lessens their suitability for highly academic purposes where peer-reviewed, primary research articles or systematic reviews are preferred.

However, these sources can still be acceptable within certain contexts, such as providing background information, illustrating real-world issues, or citing expert opinions to support discussion. Their credibility depends heavily on the author's qualifications, the publication platform, and the evidence they cite. Fuller’s article offers an overview of childhood mental health symptoms, and Gold’s piece highlights prevalence statistics in schools. Jagannathan’s article discusses recent surveys, adding contemporary relevance. Nevertheless, these are secondary sources and lack the rigorous peer review or methodological detail typical of scholarly research, which might limit their use in formal academic assignments.

In conclusion, for scholarly work, primary research articles, systematic reviews, and official reports from reputable institutions or governmental agencies are more appropriate. The articles chosen by classmate two, while useful for illustrative or contextual purposes, should be supplemented with peer-reviewed studies for academic rigor. When evaluating sources, one should consider authorship credibility, publication standards, and evidence basis. Overall, these articles can be useful for framing topics but should be used critically and complemented by more scholarly references for academic assignments.

References

• Amodio, D. M. (2019). Social Cognition 2.0: An interactive memory systems account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(1), 21-33.
• Fernandez-Sotos, P., Torio, I., Fernandez-Caballero, A., Navarro, E., Gonzalez, P., Dompablo, M., & Rodriguez-Jimenez, R. (2019). Social cognition remediation interventions: A systematic mapping review. PloS One, 14(6), e0216664.
• Juergen Gold. (2016). One out of five children have a mental illness, and schools often don't help. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com
• Jagannathan, M. (2020). How parents can keep tabs on children's mental health during COVID-19 — and get help if necessary. Journal of Pediatrics. https://www.jpeds.com
• Fuller, K. (2019). Mental health conditions seen in childhood. Retrieved from InformedHealth.org. https://www.informedhealth.org