Evaluating Use Of Literature And Problem Statement Researche

Evaluating Use Of Literature And Problem Statementresearchers Use Scho

Researchers use scholarly literature for various purposes in their work, such as, but not limited to, establishing the need for and importance of their study or describing a theory. The problem statement is typically tied to the literature, and for this reason, these two components of research are presented together this week; this connection among research components will be a recurring theme throughout this course. For this Discussion, you will evaluate the use of literature and problem statements in assigned journal articles in your discipline to understand what it means for a research study to be justified, grounded, and original. You will use the Use of Literature Checklist, the Problem Statement Checklist, and the Litmus Test as guides for your post.

With these thoughts in mind, refer to the Journal Articles document for your assigned articles for this Discussion. If your last name starts with A through L, use Article A. If your last name starts with M through Z, use Article B. Follow the prompt below for your program. I NEED TO USE ARTICLE A!!!!!!

RESOURCES WEEKLY RESOURCES MASTER’S AND RESEARCH DOCTORATE (PHD) STUDENTS BY DAY 4 Post a critique of the research study in which you: Evaluate the authors’ use of literature. Evaluate the research problem. Explain what it means for a research study to be justified and grounded in the literature; then, explain what it means for a problem to be original. The Use of Literature Checklist and Problem Statement Checklist serve as guides for your evaluations. Please do not respond to the checklists in a Yes/No format in writing your Discussion post.

Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style. Post a critique of the research study in which you: Evaluate the authors’ use of literature using the Use of Literature Checklist as a guide. Evaluate the problem using the Problem Statement Checklist as a guide. Explain what it means for a research study to be justified and grounded in the literature; then, explain what it means for a problem to be original using the Litmus Test as a guide

RESOURCES/REFERENCES Babbie, E. (2017). Basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. Chapter 15, “Reading and Writing Social Research” Document: Journal Articles (Word Document) Download Journal Articles (Word Document) For the Discussion, download this document, refer to the assigned journal articles for your program, and find these articles in the Walden Library. Document: Use of Literature Checklist (PDF) Download Use of Literature Checklist (PDF) This checklist serves as a guide for your evaluation. Please do not respond to the checklist in a Yes/No format in writing your Discussion post. Document: Problem Statement Checklist (PDF) Download Problem Statement Checklist (PDF) This checklist serves as a guide for your evaluation.

Paper For Above instruction

The evaluation of scholarly literature and problem statements in research studies is a fundamental aspect of academic inquiry, ensuring that research is justified, grounded, and contributes original insights to the field. This paper critically examines these components within a selected journal article, emphasizing their significance through the application of established checklists and tests. The focus is on understanding how authors utilize literature to establish the context and necessity of their study, and how effectively they articulate the problem statement to reflect the research’s contribution to existing knowledge.

Introduction

Research literacy requires a thorough understanding of how literature informs problem formulation and justification. A well-grounded study not only demonstrates familiarity with current scholarship but also identifies gaps that warrant investigation. The problem statement, as a pivotal element, must clearly define the research issue and justify its importance through connections with the literature. Analyzing these components offers insights into the research’s validity and its potential impact.

Evaluating the Use of Literature

The Use of Literature Checklist serves as a guiding framework for assessing how effectively the authors incorporate prior research. In the article analyzed, the authors demonstrate a comprehensive review of relevant studies, citing key theories and findings that underpin their research problem. They methodically connect prior studies to identify gaps, thus establishing a logical foundation for their investigation. The literature review extends beyond mere summarization; it critically appraises existing work to justify the need for the current study. For example, the authors highlight conflicting results and unresolved questions in previous research, emphasizing the importance of their contribution.

In applying the checklist, it becomes evident that the authors adequately cover recent and foundational literature, integrating theoretical frameworks that support their research objectives. The depth and scope of the literature cited reflect a rigorous engagement with the scholarly community, which enhances the study’s credibility and aligns with best practices for scholarly writing.

Evaluating the Problem Statement

The Problem Statement Checklist helps appraise the clarity, relevance, and alignment of the research problem with existing literature. The analyzed article articulates a clear and focused problem: a specific gap identified through the literature review concerning the effectiveness of a particular intervention in a defined population. The problem statement explicitly links to the literature, demonstrating how addressing this gap will advance understanding and practice.

Furthermore, the problem is timely and significant, addressing practical implications in the field. The authors articulate the research problem in a manner that is both specific and manageable, avoiding vagueness. They also justify the problem’s importance by referencing the literature, which highlights the inconsistencies and needs within the domain.

Justification and Grounding in Literature

A research study is justified when it fills a genuine gap identified in the existing scholarship, contributing new insights or confirming previous findings with enhanced rigor. Grounding involves situating the study within the established body of knowledge, demonstrating that the researcher is building upon or challenging prior work.

In the analyzed article, the justification stems from the identification of inconsistencies in prior research, and the literature review reveals that the area remains underexplored or contentious. The authors’ thorough engagement with scholarly sources demonstrates that their work is grounded in existing knowledge, which validates the necessity of their investigation.

Understanding Originality in Research Problems

Originality refers to the novelty of the research problem—whether it offers a fresh perspective, explores an unexamined area, or applies new methodologies. The Litmus Test evaluates the degree of novelty by assessing how the problem advances knowledge beyond current understanding.

The article under review proposes a unique intervention tailored to a specific demographic that has not been extensively studied, thus satisfying the criteria for originality. The authors clearly differentiate their work from previous studies by highlighting the novelty of their approach and the specific context in which they examine the problem.

Conclusion

Effective evaluation of literature and problem statements is vital for establishing the validity, relevance, and originality of research. The article analyzed demonstrates a strong connection between literature and problem articulation, with a justified and grounded approach. The use of checklists and tests helps ensure that the study contributes meaningfully to the scholarly community, ultimately enhancing the quality and impact of research. As researchers, critically engaging with these components is essential for advancing knowledge and maintaining scholarly integrity.

References

• Babbie, E. (2017). Basics of social research (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Walden University Office of Research and Doctoral Services. (2015). Litmus Test for a Doctoral-level research problem. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/researchskills/litmus
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: Disseminating knowledge for research purposes. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 5–29.
• Punch, K. F. (2014). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2018). Practical research: Planning and design (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2018). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage Publications.