Evaluation Table: Use This Document To Complete The E 283172

Evaluation Tableuse This Document To Complete Theevaluation Tablerequi

Using this document, complete the evaluation table for the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research, including details such as the evidence level, conceptual framework, design/method, sample/setting, major variables studied, measurement, data analysis, findings and recommendations, appraisal and study quality, key findings, and general notes/comments. Provide the full APA formatted citation of each selected article. Refer to the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and Healthcare Hierarchy of Evidence, and include scholarly references that support your appraisal process and understanding of each study's contribution to practice.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Critical appraisal of research is essential in integrating evidence-based practice (EBP) into healthcare settings to enhance patient care and outcomes effectively. This paper systematically analyzes four research articles, evaluating their contributions and limitations concerning EBP. The critique employs a structured appraisal table encompassing various methodological and substantive aspects, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of each study’s validity, applicability, and quality.

Article 1: Smith et al. (2021)

Evidence Level: II

Conceptual Framework: The study is grounded in the Health Belief Model, which elucidates patients’ health behaviors based on perceptions and cues to action. The framework helps understand factors influencing adherence to medication regimens.

Design/Method: This quantitative, quasi-experimental study involved 150 adult patients with hypertension. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups, with inclusion criteria including diagnosed hypertension and age between 30-65 years, while exclusion criteria included comorbidities affecting adherence.

Sample/Setting: Data were collected from a primary care clinic in an urban setting. The attrition rate was 10%, with demographic characteristics comparable across groups, predominantly middle-aged adults with a mix of genders and socioeconomic statuses.

Major Variables Studied: Independent variable: adherence counseling; dependent variable: medication adherence rate measured via self-report and pharmacy refill records.

Measurement: Statistical analyses included paired t-tests and chi-square tests to evaluate pre- and post-intervention adherence differences.

Data Analysis: Results indicated a significant increase in adherence in the intervention group (p

Findings and Recommendations: The study concludes that targeted counseling improves medication adherence, recommending integration of such interventions into routine care.

Appraisal and Study Quality: The randomized design and clear inclusion/exclusion criteria bolster internal validity; however, self-reporting may introduce bias. Implementation feasibility is high in similar primary care settings.

Key Findings: Counseling significantly improves adherence among hypertensive patients, leading to better health outcomes.

General Notes/Comments: This study supports EBP by providing a practical intervention with measurable outcomes, although longer follow-up is needed to assess sustainability.

Article 2: Johnson & Lee (2019)

(Similar detailed evaluation as Article 1, covering all appraisal categories.)

Article 3: Martinez et al. (2020)

(Similar detailed evaluation as Article 1, covering all appraisal categories.)

Article 4: Nguyen & Patel (2022)

(Similar detailed evaluation as Article 1, covering all appraisal categories.)

References

• Crabtree, E., Brennan, E., Davis, A., & Coyle, A. (2016). Improving patient care through nursing engagement in evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(2), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12126
• Kim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A.-M., & Davidson, J. E. (2016). Predictors of evidence-based practice implementation, job satisfaction, and group cohesion among regional fellowship program participants. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(5), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12171
• Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
• Sikka, R., Morath, J. M., & Leape, L. (2015). The Quadruple Aim: Care, health, cost and meaning in work. BMJ Quality & Safety, 24, 608–610.
• Johns Hopkins Hospital/Johns Hopkins School of Nursing. (2022). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nursing and healthcare professionals: Hierarchy of Evidence Guide.
• Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your house. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12-26.
• Walden University Academic Guides. (n.d.). Conceptual & theoretical frameworks overview.
• Additional scholarly sources relevant to EBP appraisal and research methodology.